Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Comparison of scheduling algorithms for multifunction radar

Comparison of scheduling algorithms for multifunction radar

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The management of radar resources in a multifunction radar is central to unlocking the potential offered by electronic scanning. Scheduling is an important sub-problem of radar resource management because of the strong correlation between how tasks should be performed, as well as the time available to carry them out and their timeliness. Two scheduling algorithms previously reported in the literature are compared in order to investigate differences in their performance. This provides new insights which may be invaluable in the development of future optimal schedulers. A detailed model of a multifunction radar has been developed to enable comparison using the same operational conditions. The radar is assumed to operate in both ‘underload’ and ‘overload’ situations. When not fully loaded (i.e. underload), the two scheduling algorithms perform in significantly different ways. However, in the more important case of overload situations, where there are insufficient radar resources to carry out all necessary tasks, both algorithms provide similar performance. Nevertheless, there still remain differences that require careful understanding when selecting the most appropriate scheduler.

References

    1. 1)
      • Musick, S., Malhotra, R.: `Chasing the elusive sensor manager', Proc. National Aerospace and Electronics Conf., 1994, Dayton, OH, 1, p. 606–613.
    2. 2)
      • S. Sabatini , M. Tarantino . (1994) Multifunction array radar – system design and analysis.
    3. 3)
      • Strömberg, D., Grahn, P.: `Scheduling of tasks in phased array radar', Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Phased Array Systems and Technology, 1996, Boston, USA, p. 318–321.
    4. 4)
      • Billam, E.R.: `Parameter optimisation in phased array', Proc. RADAR 2002 Conf., 15–17 October 2002,, Edinburgh, p. 34–37, IEE Conf. Publ. No. 490.
    5. 5)
      • W.K. Stafford . Real-time control of a multifunction electronically scanned adaptive radar (MESAR). IEE Colloquium on Real Time Management of Adaptive Radar Systems , 7/1 - 7/5
    6. 6)
      • Coetzee, S.L., Woodbridge, K., Baker, C.J.: `Multifunction radar resource management using tracking optimisation', Proc. Int. Conf. RADAR 2003, 3–5 September 2003, Adelaide, Australia, p. 578–583.
    7. 7)
      • Miranda, S.L.C., Baker, C.J., Woodbridge, K., Griffiths, H.D.: `Phased array radar resource management: a comparison of scheduling algorithms', Proc. IEEE Radar Conf., 2004, 26–29 April 2004, Philadelphia, USA, p. 79–84.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • Izquierdo-Fuente, A., Casar-Corredera, J.R.: `Optimal radar pulse scheduling using a neural network', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Networks, 1994, Orlando, USA, 7, p. 4558–4591.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Butler, J.M.: `Multi-function radar tracking and control', 1998, PhD, UCL University of London.
    12. 12)
      • Billam, E.R.: `The problem of time in phased array radar', Proc. RADAR'97 Conf., 14–16 October 1997,, Edinburgh, p. 563–567, IEE Conf. Publ. No. 449.
    13. 13)
      • Vine, M.T.: `Fuzzy logic in radar resource management', Proc. IEE Conf. Multifunction Radar and Sonar Sensor Management Techniques, Paper No. 173, 2001, p. 5/1–4.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn_20070003
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn_20070003
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address