Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Stagger procedure to extend the frequency modulated interrupted continuous wave technique to high resolution radars

Stagger procedure to extend the frequency modulated interrupted continuous wave technique to high resolution radars

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radars offer many advantages such as low peak power, low probability of interception, low interference to other systems and high range resolution. However, their major drawback is the isolation required between transmitter and receiver that typically leads to the use of two separate antennas for transmission and reception. Some schemes have been proposed to enable FMCW radars to operate with a single antenna. Frequency modulated interrupted continuous wave (FMICW) is a possible solution. However, some considerations must be taken into account before implementing this technique in high resolution radars because of the amount of bandwidth needed. The problems associated with the use of the FMICW technique in broadband radars are analysed and a staggering procedure is proposed to overcome them. This technique is tested using simulated data from a 1 GHz bandwidth millimetre wave sensor, currently under development. The results are compared against other single antenna configurations and the advantages of the staggering technique are shown.

References

    1. 1)
      • J.S. Son , G. Thomas , B.C. Flores . (2001) Range-Doppler radar imaging and motion compensation.
    2. 2)
      • A. Papoulis . (1991) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes.
    3. 3)
      • Beasley, P.D.L., Stove, A.G., Reits, B.J., As, B.: `Solving the problems of a single antenna frequency modulated CW radar', Radar Conf., 1990, Record of the IEEE 1990 Int., 7–10 May 1990, p. 391–395.
    4. 4)
      • J.A. McGregor , E.M. Poulter , M.J. Smith . Switching system for single antenna operation of an S-band FMCW radar. IEE Proc., Radar Sonar Navig. , 241 - 248
    5. 5)
      • (2003) Microwave Millimeterwave Product.
    6. 6)
      • A.V. Oppenheim , R.W. Schafer . (1989) Discrete-time signal processing.
    7. 7)
      • A.W.V. Poole . On the use of pseudorandom codes for “chirp” radar. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , 4 , 480 - 485
    8. 8)
      • F.J. Harris . On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fouriertransform. IEEE Proc. , 1 , 51 - 83
    9. 9)
      • R.H. Khan , D.K. Mitchell . Waveform analysis for high-frequency FMICW radar. IEE Proc., F , 5 , 411 - 419
    10. 10)
      • Grajal, J., Asensio, A., Requejo, L.: `From a high-resolution LFM-CW shipborne radar to an airport surface detection equipment', Radar Conf., 2004. Proc. IEEE, 26–29 April 2004, p. 157–160.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn_20060033
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn_20060033
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address