Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Clutter-suppressing performance estimation methods of active sonar waveform based on reverberation statistical models in littoral environment

Detecting low-speed quiet targets such as divers and underwater-unmanned-vehicles in littoral environment by using active sonar is becoming increasingly attractive. When using a Doppler insensitive pulsed linearly frequency modulated signal, the high-level clutters which might arise from underwater physical scatterers will lead to excessive false alarm rates and limit the detection performance. However, Doppler sensitive waveforms such as binary phase shift keying have the capability of filtering clutters and degrading false alarms. Thus, the question how to estimate the clutter-suppressing performance of waveforms is essential for sonar system design. In this study, the clutter-rejecting principle of waveform is theoretically introduced firstly. Then, based on the reverberation statistical features, this study proposes two methods, the Doppler-statistic method and envelope-statistic method, separately, to estimate and evaluate the clutter suppressing performance of waveforms. Finally, the methods are verified by lake experiments. It is proved that the first method has the capacity of calculating the confidence probability of suppressing clutters by a waveform, and through the second method, the clutter rejecting performance of waveforms can be evaluated and verified. The methods can be used for selecting and designing waveforms to reduce false alarms and improve detection performance.

References

    1. 1)
      • 7. Murray, J.J.: ‘A theoretical model of linearly filtered reverberation for pulsed active sonar in shallow water’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2014, 136.5, pp. 25232531.
    2. 2)
      • 4. Abraham, D.A., Gelb, J.M., Oldag, A.W.: ‘Background and clutter mixture distributions for active sonar statistics’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2011, 36.2, pp. 231247.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Prior, M.K., Baldacci, A.: ‘The physical causes of clutter and its suppression via sub-band processing’, Conf. Oceans IEEE, 2006, pp. 16.
    4. 4)
      • 5. Abraham, D.A., Lyons, A.P.: ‘Novel physical interpretations of K-distributed reverberation’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2002, 27.4, pp. 800813.
    5. 5)
      • 2. Colin, M.E.G.D., Beerens, S.P.: ‘False-alarm reduction for low-frequency active sonar with BPSK pulses: experimental results’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2011, 36.1, pp. 5259.
    6. 6)
      • 9. Abraham, D.A., Lyons, A.P.: ‘Simulation of non-Rayleigh reverberation and clutter’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2004, 29.2, pp. 347362.
    7. 7)
      • 6. van Walree, P.A., Jenserud, T., Smedsrud, M.: ‘A discrete-Time channel simulator driven by measured scattering functions’, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 2009, 26.9, pp. 16281637.
    8. 8)
      • 10. Abraham, D.A., Lyons, A.P.: ‘Reverberation envelope statistics and their dependence on sonar bandwidth and scattering patch size’, Ocean. Eng. IEEE J., 2004, 29.1, pp. 126137.
    9. 9)
      • 14. Jourdain, G., Henrioux, J.P.: ‘Use of large bandwidth duration binary phase shift keying signals in target delay Doppler measurements’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1991, 90.1, pp. 299309.
    10. 10)
      • 15. Mours, A., Mars, J.I., Ioana, C., et al: ‘Range, velocity and immersion estimation of a moving target in a water-filled tank with an active sonar system’, Conf. Oceans IEEE, 2015, pp. 16.
    11. 11)
      • 17. Preston, J.R., Abraham, D.A.: ‘Statistical analysis of multistatic echoes from a Shipwreck in the Malta plateau’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2014, 40.3, pp. 114.
    12. 12)
      • 19. Nakahira, K., Okuma, S., Kodama, T., et al: ‘The use of binary coded frequency shift keyed signals for multiple user sonar ranging’. IEEE Int. Conf. Networking, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 12711275.
    13. 13)
      • 16. Abraham, D.A., Lyons, A.P.: ‘Reliable methods for estimating the K-distribution shape parameter’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2010, 35.2, pp. 288302.
    14. 14)
      • 13. Rihaczek, A.W.: ‘Delay-Doppler ambiguity function for wideband signals’, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1967, 3.4, pp. 705711.
    15. 15)
      • 12. Etter, P.C.: ‘Underwater acoustic modeling and simulation’ (CRC Press, 2013, 4th edn.), pp. 291309.
    16. 16)
      • 11. Lyons, A.P., Abraham, D.A.: ‘Statistical characterization of high-frequency shallow-water seafloor backscatter’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1999, 106.3, pp. 13071315.
    17. 17)
      • 20. Yang, T.C., Yang, W.B.: ‘Interference suppression for code-division multiple-access communications in an underwater acoustic channel’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2009, 126.1, pp. 220228.
    18. 18)
      • 1. Yang, T.C., Schindall, J., Huang, C.F., et al: ‘Clutter reduction using Doppler sonar in a harbor environment’, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2012, 132.5, pp. 30533067.
    19. 19)
      • 8. Gelb, J.M., Heath, R.E., Tipple, G.L.: ‘Statistics of distinct clutter classes in midfrequency active sonar’, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 2010, 35.2, pp. 220229.
    20. 20)
      • 18. Collins, T., Atkins, P.: ‘Doppler-sensitive active sonar pulse designs for reverberation processing’, IEE Proc.-Radar Sonar Navig., 1999, 145.6, pp. 347353.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0069
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0069
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address