Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Development of an indoor guidance system for unmanned aerial vehicles with power industry applications

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Received 08/05/2016, Accepted 15/06/2016, Published 16/06/2016

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems are experiencing a period of rapid growth as potential for industrial and commercial applications are arising. Conventional UAV technologies focus on outdoor large area navigation, utilising global positioning system, which has proven to be less effective in enclosed environments. The authors aim to develop an indoor navigation system, specifically for industrial applications which require custom sensing technologies to aid in pilot navigation. A custom sensing array, featuring ultrasonic transceivers, was developed to localise drone position in an enclosed known environment and provide pilot feedback. Six subjects were recruited to pilot the drone with and without the navigation system in an enclosed room to a pre-set target at a known location in two cases: (i) with a line of sight, and (ii) without line of sight. Flight duration, number of collisions, and distance from target were recorded and used to quantify performance. Using the navigation system, subjects were able to reduce their flight duration on average by 19.7% during an obstructed line of sight, illustrating the increased ability and confidence in piloting the drone using the navigation system. This study serves to prove the potential of this device as an essential tool for indoor drone localisation and commercial inspections.

Inspec keywords: aircraft communication; autonomous aerial vehicles; telerobotics; mobile robots

Other keywords: featuring ultrasonic transceivers; indoor guidance system; custom sensing array; flight duration; UAV systems; indoor navigation system; unmanned aerial vehicles; power industry applications; pilot navigation; custom sensing technologies; global positioning system

Subjects: Mobile radio systems

References

    1. 1)
      • 7. Calo, R.: ‘The drone as privacy catalyst’, Stanford Law Rev. Online, 2011, 64, pp. 29–33.
    2. 2)
      • 22. Gageik, N., Benz, P., Montenegro, S.: ‘Obstacle detection and collision avoidance for a UAV with complementary low-cost sensors’, IEEE Access, 2015, 3, pp. 599–609.
    3. 3)
      • 19. Stuart, B.: ‘Infrared spectroscopy’ (Wiley Online Library, 2005).
    4. 4)
      • 21. Park, S., Won, D.H., Kang, M.S., et al: ‘Ric (robust internal-loop compensator) based flight control of a quad-rotor type UAV’. 2005 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005.
    5. 5)
      • 8. Arumugam, D.D., Griffin, J.D., Stancil, D.D., et al: ‘Three-dimensional position and orientation measurements using magneto-quasistatic fields and complex image theory [measurements corner]’, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 2014, 56, (1), pp. 160–173.
    6. 6)
      • 14. Hazas, M., Hopper, A.: ‘Broadband ultrasonic location systems for improved indoor positioning’, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 2006, 5, (5), pp. 536–547.
    7. 7)
      • 10. Fu, Q., Retscher, G.: ‘Active Rfid trilateration and location fingerprinting based on Rssi for pedestrian navigation’, J. Navig., 2009, 62, (02), pp. 323–340.
    8. 8)
      • 16. Ross, D.A., Lim, J., Lin, R.-S., et al: ‘Incremental learning for robust visual tracking’, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2008, 77, (1–3), pp. 125–141.
    9. 9)
      • 17. Montoya, A., Vandeportaele, B., Lacroix, S., et al: ‘Flight autonomy of micro-drone in indoor environments using lidar flash camera’. Int. Micro Air Vehicle Conf. and Flight Competition, IMAV 2010, 2010.
    10. 10)
      • 13. Zwirello, L., Schipper, T., Jalilvand, M., et al: ‘Realization limits of impulse-based localization system for large-scale indoor applications’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2015, 64, (1), pp. 39–51.
    11. 11)
      • 15. Nishida, Y., Aizawa, H., Hori, T., et al: ‘3d ultrasonic tagging system for observing human activity’. IEEE/RSJ Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003 (IROS 2003) 2003, 2003.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Medina, C., Segura, J.C., Holm, S.: ‘Feasibility of ultrasound positioning based on signal strength’. Int. Conf. on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2012, 2012.
    13. 13)
      • 2. Gilli, A., Gilli, M.: ‘The diffusion of drone warfare? the ecosystem challenge: industrial, organizational and infrastructural constraints’. The Ecosystem Challenge: Industrial, Organizational and Infrastructural Constraints (April 16, 2014), 2014.
    14. 14)
      • 23. Sabatini, A.M.: ‘A digital signal-processing technique for compensating ultrasonic sensors’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 1995, 44, (4), pp. 869–874.
    15. 15)
      • 20. Misnan, M.F.b., Arshad, N.M., Razak, N.A.: ‘Construction sonar sensor model of low altitude field mapping sensors for application on a UAV’. IEEE Eighth Int. Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications (CSPA), 2012, 2012.
    16. 16)
      • 11. Bouet, M., Dos Santos, A.L.: ‘Rfid tags: positioning principles and localization techniques’. Wireless Days, 2008, WD'08. First IFIP, 2008.
    17. 17)
      • 24. Wehn, H.W., Belanger, P.R.: ‘Ultrasound-based robot position estimation’, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 1997, 13, (5), pp. 682–692.
    18. 18)
      • 5. Liu, H., Darabi, H., Banerjee, P., et al: ‘Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., 2007, 37, (6), pp. 1067–1080.
    19. 19)
      • 18. Tang, L., Shao, G.: ‘Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices’, J. Forestry Res., 2015, pp. 1–7.
    20. 20)
      • 1. Asaro, P.M.: ‘The labor of surveillance and bureaucratized killing: new subjectivities of military drone operators’, Soc. Semiotics, 2013, 23, (2), pp. 196–224.
    21. 21)
      • 6. Wing, M.G., Eklund, A., Kellogg, L.D.: ‘Consumer-grade global positioning system (Gps) accuracy and reliability’, J. Forestry, 2005, 103, (4), pp. 169–173.
    22. 22)
      • 9. Eckert, J., German, R., Dressler, F.: ‘An indoor localization framework for four-rotor flying robots using low-power sensor nodes’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2011, 60, (2), pp. 336–344.
    23. 23)
      • 25. DJI Innovations, I., Phantom 2 Vision+ User Manual V1.8’, 2015.
    24. 24)
      • 4. Packer, J., Reeves, J.: ‘Romancing the drone: military desire and anthropophobia from sage to swarm’, Can. J. Commun., 2013, 38, (3), pp. 309–331.
    25. 25)
      • 3. Gregory, T.S., Tse, Z., Lewis, D.: ‘Drones: balancing risk and potential’, Science, 2015, 347, (6228), pp. 1323–1323.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0232
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2016.0232
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address