Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Efficient design of radar waveforms for optimised detection in coloured noise

Efficient design of radar waveforms for optimised detection in coloured noise

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors present a computationally efficient method for designing practical radar transmit waveforms that maximize the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) in a known additive coloured Gaussian noise environment. The problem reduces to a non-linear constrained optimisation in which the authors seek the SINR-maximising transmit waveform that has a specified envelope and an acceptable autocorrelation sequence (ACS). The waveform ACS can be constrained either directly or indirectly. The direct approach involves forcing the ACS magnitude below a specified level at each lag. This provides the greatest control over the waveform ACS, but it is too computationally demanding for many realistic problem sizes. Indirect methods of ACS constraint can be computationally less demanding, but they afford only inexact control over the waveform ACS. The leading indirect approach, which relies on the so-called similarity constraint, requires significantly fewer calculations than the direct approach, but it provides significantly less SINR improvement. The indirect approach presented here relies on a parametrisation of the phase perturbations of a linear frequency modulated waveform. This approach requires fewer calculations than the direct approach, and can provide more SINR improvement than the similarity constraint approach. As such, this new approach may be preferable when computation time is limited.

References

    1. 1)
      • De Nicola, S., Huang, Y., De Maio, S., Zhang, A., Farina, A.: `Code optimization with similarity and accuracy constraints', 2008 IEEE Radar Conf., 26–30 May 2008.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • Optimization Toolbox 4: User's Guide, 2008. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/optim/optim_tb.pdf.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • N. Levanon , E. Mozeson . (2004) Radar signals.
    10. 10)
      • M.I. Skolnik . (1990) Radar handbook.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • P.M. Woodward . (1953) Probability and information theory, with applications to radar.
    17. 17)
      • Lee, S., Uhran, J.: `Optimum signal and filter design in underwater acoustic echo ranging system', OCEANS, 1972, 4, p. 25–30.
    18. 18)
      • P. Stoica , R. Moses . (2005) Spectral analysis of signals.
    19. 19)
      • Patton, L.K., Rigling, B.D.: `Modulus constraints in adaptive radar waveform design', 2008 IEEE Conf. on Radar, 8–13 February 2008.
    20. 20)
      • V. Amuso , S. Blunt , E. Mokole , R. Schneible , M. Wicks . (2009) Applications and methods of waveform diversity.
    21. 21)
      • S.M. Kay . (1993) Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • IEEE Signal Process. Mag.. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. , 1
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • (2007) IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process..
    27. 27)
      • L.K. Patton , B.D. Rigling . Phase retrieval for radar waveform optimization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • J. Nocedal , S.J. Wright . (1999) Numerical optimization.
    30. 30)
      • L.K. Patton , B.D. Rigling . On the structure of waveform optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.
    31. 31)
      • T. Kooij . (1968) Optimum signals in noise and reverberation, NATO advanced study institute on signal processing with emphasis on underwater acoustics.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • Cohen, A.: `A nonlinear integer programming algorithm for the design of radar waveforms', 12thAnnual Allerton Conf. on Circuit and System Theory, 2–4 October 1974, Monticello, IL, 1975.
    34. 34)
      • Patton, L.: `On the satisfaction of modulus and ambiguity function constraints in radar waveform optimization for detection', 2009, PhD, Wright State University, Available: http://etd.ohiolink.edu/view.cgi?acc_num=wright1247595193.
    35. 35)
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
      • M.A. Richards . (2005) Fundamentals of radar signal processing.
    38. 38)
      • Patton, L.K., Rigling, B.D.: `Autocorrelation and modulus constraints in radar waveform optimization', Fourth Int. Waveform Diversity and Design Conf., 8–13 February 2009.
    39. 39)
    40. 40)
      • S. Leyffer , A. Mahajan . Nonlinear constrained optimization: methods and software.
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
    43. 43)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0071
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0071
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address