References

• 1. 1)
     • 26. Andriamalala, R.N., Wang, Y., Colas, F., et al: ‘Experimental assessment of the wind turbine contribution to the primary frequency control in an isolated power system’. IEEE PowerTech, Grenoble, France, 2013, pp. 16–20.
  2. 2)
     • 11. Silva, V., Burtin, A.: ‘Technical and economic issues of the integration of a large share of variable RES to the European Interconnected systems’, EDF R&D Technical report, 2015(http://www.chercheurs.edf.com/programmes-de-recherche/environnement-et-energies-renouvelables/).
  3. 3)
     • 1. European Comission: ‘Energy roadmap 2050 impact assessment and scenario analysis’, Brussels, 15 May 2011.
  4. 4)
     • 16. Wang, Y., Bayem, H., Giralt-Devant, M., et al: ‘Methods for assessing available wind primary power reserve’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2015, 6, (1), pp. 272–280 (doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2014.2369235).
  5. 5)
     • 2. KEMA Consulting: ‘Integration of renewable energy in Europe’ (European Commission, DG Energy, Brussels, 2014).
  6. 6)
     • 15. Wang, Y., Delille, G., Bayem, H., et al: ‘High wind power penetration in isolated power systems – assessment of wind inertial and primary frequency responses’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (3), pp. 2412–2420 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2240466).
  7. 7)
     • 5. O'Sullivan, J., Rogers, A., Flynn, D., et al: ‘Studying the maximum instantaneous non-synchronous generation in an Island system – frequency stability challenges in Ireland’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2014, 29, (6), pp. 2943–2951 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2316974).
  8. 8)
     • 14. Wang, Y., Silva, V., Winkels, A.: ‘Impact of high penetration of wind and PV generation on frequency dynamics in the continental Europe interconnected system’. 13th Int. Workshop on Large-scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Berlin, October 2014.
  9. 9)
     • 18. Moreno, R., Moreira, R., Strbac, G.: ‘A MILP model for optimising multi-service portfolios of distributed energy storage’, Appl. Energy, 2015, 137, (1).
  10. 10)
      • 15. De Vos, K., Driesen, J.: ‘Active participation of wind power in operating reserves’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2015, 9, (6), pp. 566–575, (doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0142).
  11. 11)
      • 12. Asal, H.P., Barth, P., Grebe, E., et al: ‘Dynamic system studies of new requirements and strategies for the primary control in the UCPTE/CENTREL power system’, Cigré 1998, Paris.
  12. 12)
      • 24. Wang, Y., Guillaud, X., Duval, J., et al: ‘Enhanced design of a deloaded wind turbine controller for frequency regulation participation’. Proc. 9th Int. Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems, Québec city, Canada, 18–19 October 2010.
  13. 13)
      • 10. Word Outlook of Energy released by the International Energy Agency (vision 2030, scenario Current Policies – 2012 version).
  14. 14)
      • 13. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and control’ (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994).
  15. 15)
      • 20. ENTSO-E: ‘ENTSO-E Network Code for Requirements for Grid Connection Applicable to all Generators’, March 2013, Available: http://www.networkcodes.entsoe.eu/connection-codes/requirements-for-generators/.
  16. 16)
      • 3. Hirth, L., Ueckerdt, F., Edenhofer, O.: ‘Integration costs revisited – an economic framework for wind and solar variability’, Renew. Energy, 2015, 74, pp. 925–939 (doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.065).
  17. 17)
      • 8. Langrene, N., van Ackooij, W., Breant, F.: ‘Dynamic constraints for aggregated units: formulation and application’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 1349–1356 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2089539).
  18. 18)
      • 22. Omara, H., Bouffard, F.: ‘A methodology to study the impact of an increasingly nonconventional load mix on primary frequency control’. IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2009, PES '09, 26–30 July 2009, pp. 1–7.
  19. 19)
      • 4. Fernandez-Bernal, F., Egido, I., Lobato, E.: ‘Maximum wind power generation in a power system imposed by system inertia and primary reserve requirements’, Wind Energy, doi: 10.1002/we.1773, 2015, 18, (8), pp. 1501–1514.
  20. 20)
      • 25. Ruttledge, L., Miller, N.W., O'Sullivan, J., et al: ‘Frequency response of power systems with variable speed wind turbines’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 3, (4), pp. 683–691.
  21. 21)
      • 5. Molina-García, A., Bouffard, F., Kirschen, D.S.: ‘Decentralized demand-side contribution to primary frequency control’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (1), pp. 411–419 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2048223).
  22. 22)
      • 21. ENTSO-E: ‘Dispersed generation impact on CE region security - dynamic study final report’, March 2013. Available at: https://www.entsoe.eu/publications/system-operations-reports.
  23. 23)
      • 23. National Grid, GC022 – Frequency Response, Frequency Response Workgroup Report, 9 January 2013, Warwick, UK.
  24. 24)
      • 27. Vidyanandan, K.V., Senroy, N.: ‘Primary frequency regulation by deloaded wind turbines using variable droop’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 837–846 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2208233).
  25. 25)
      • 26. Andriamalala, R.N., Wang, Y., Colas, F., et al: ‘Experimental assessment of the wind turbine contribution to the primary frequency control in an isolated power system’. IEEE PowerTech, Grenoble, France, 2013, pp. 16–20.
  26. 26)
      • 9. Lopez-Botet, M., Hinchliffe, T., Fourment, P., et al: ‘Methodology for the economic and technical analysis of the European power system with a large share of variable renewable generation’. Presented at IEEE General Meeting, Washington, USA, 27–31 July 2014.
  27. 27)
      • 7. Vasconcelos, H., Moreira, C., Madureira, A., et al: ‘Advanced control solutions for operating isolated power systems: examining the Portuguese Islands.’, IEEE Electrification Mag., 2015, 3, (1), pp. 25–35 (doi: 10.1109/MELE.2014.2380131).
  28. 28)
      • 19. ENTSO-E: ‘Continental Europe Operation Handbook’, Available at: https://www.entsoe.eu.