The need for inertial response provided by wind turbines (WTs) has been discussed in the industry for more than five years now. Yet, as of today only very few grid codes include specific requirements. Hence, the number of wind farms in commercial operation using such frequency control features is low, and knowledge of the real capabilities and limitations of inertial response from WTs is limited. The objective of this article was to summarise and to assess two years of operational experience with inertial response provided by type 4 WTs installed in a 138 MW wind farm in the Canadian province of Québec. In order to put the topic into context, existing and anticipated future grid code requirements in respect to inertial response as well as related performance criteria were summarised. Data from high-frequency measurement devices recorded at various operating conditions and grid situations was downloaded and processed. The actual performance was compared with the expected characteristics for each of the measurements, which allowed identifying areas for further development. Results of dynamic simulations demonstrated that the methodology and the models used for frequency control studies need to be improved.

References

1. 1)
  - 20. ‘Enhanced Frequency Control Capability (EFCC), October 2014’, available at http://www.smarternetworks.org/Files/Enhanced_Frequency_Control_Capability_141125101940.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
2. 2)
  - 27. ‘Exigences techniques de raccordement de centrales, Novembre 2013’, available at http://publicsde.regie-energie.qc.ca/projets/208/DocPrj/R-3830-2012-B-0042-DemAmend-PieceRev-2013_11_29.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
3. 3)
  - 5. Aubut, N., Brisebois, J.: ‘Wind farm inertia emulation to fulfill hydro-Québec's specific need’. Proc. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, USA, July 2011.
4. 4)
  - 2. Hansen, A.D.: ‘Type IV: variable speed with full-scale frequency converter’, in Ackermann, T. (ed): ‘Wind power in power systems’ (Wiley, 2012, 2nd edn.), pp. 76–77.
5. 5)
  - 3. ‘Transmission Provider Technical Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro Québec Transmission System, March 2006’, available at http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_mar_06_en.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
6. 6)
  - 6. ‘General Validation Test program for Wind Power Plants Connected to the Hydro-Québec Transmission System, February 2011’, available at http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/essais-eoliennes2011-en.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
7. 7)
  - 23. Ruttledge, L., Flynn, D.: ‘Emulated Inertial Response from Wind Turbines: The Case for Bespoke Power System Optimisation’. Proc. 11th Int. Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Lisbon, Portugal, November 2012.
8. 8)
  - 8. Wachtel, S., Beekmann, A.: ‘Contribution of wind energy converters with inertia emulation to frequency control and frequency stability in power systems’. Proc. 8th Int. Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Bremen, Germany, October 2009.
9. 9)
  - 14. ‘Market Manual 2: Market Administration, Performance Validation, Issue 1.1’, available at http://www.ieso.ca/Documents/imowebpub/201406/IESO_REQ_0208_v1.1.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
10. 10)
  - 1. Muljadi, E., Gevorgian, V., Singh, M., et al: ‘Understanding inertial and frequency response of wind power plants’. Proc. IEEE Symp. on Power Electronics and Machines in Wind Applications, Denver, USA, July 2012, pp. 1–8.
11. 11)
  - 15. ‘System Impact Assessment Report, Niagara Region Wind Farm, July 27, 2012’, available at http://www.ieso.ca/Documents/caa/CAA_2012-466_Final_Report.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
12. 12)
  - 19. ‘System Operability Framework 2014, September 2014’, available at http://www2.nationalgrid.com/mwg-internal/de5fs23hu73ds/progress?id=oTf7dd-c2QkY4LQbBoR1nvWuggyz1mbqyOZQlnJ_SVE, accessed 01 April 2015.
13. 13)
  - 18. ‘DS3 System Services, Technical Definitions, Decision Paper, SEM-13-098, 20 December 2013’, available at http://www.allislandproject.org/en/transmission_decision_documents.aspx?article=06c22cd8-a936-426b-ac21-ed28b5292566, accessed 01 April 2015.
14. 14)
  - 22. ‘Network Code on Requirements for Grid Connection Applicable to all Generators (RfG)’, available at https://www.entsoe.eu/major-projects/network-code-development/ requirements-for-generators/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 01 April 2015.
15. 15)
  - 10. Asmine, M., Langlois, C.-E.: ‘Field measurements for the assessment of inertial response for wind power plants based on Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie requirements’. Proc. 13th Int. Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Berlin, Germany, November 2014.
16. 16)
  - 24. ‘Active Power Controls from Wind Power: Bridging the Gaps’, available at http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/60574.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
17. 17)
  - 17. ‘DS3 System Services, Procurement Design, SEM Committee Consultation, SEM-14-059, 09 July 2014’, available at http://www.eirgrid.com/media/DS3_System_Services_Procurement_Consultation_SEM-14-059.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
18. 18)
  - 9. Fecteau, M., Langlois, C.-E., Marques, J., et al: ‘Assessment of ENERCON WEC grid performance based on Hydro-Québec system requirements: a cooperation between ENERCON and Hydro-Québec’. Proc. 9th Int. Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Quebec, Canada, October 2010.
19. 19)
  - 26. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and control’ (McGraw-Hill, 1994, 1st edn.).
20. 20)
  - 21. ‘Implementation Plan 2015–2017, Research & Development Roadmap 2013–2022, March 2014’, available at https://www.entsoe.eu/publications/research-and-development-reports/Documents/entsoe_iPlan_2015_2017_web_final.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
21. 21)
  - 11. ‘Requirements for the Interconnection of Distributed Generation to the Hydro-Québec Medium-Voltage Distribution System, February 2009’, available at http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/e1201_fev09_en.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
22. 22)
  - 7. Langlois, C.-E., Asmine, M., Fischer, M., et al: ‘On-site under voltage ride through performance tests – assessment of ENERCON wind energy converters based on hydro-Québec TransÉnergie requirements’. Proc. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, USA, July 2012.
23. 23)
  - 13. ‘Market Rules for the Ontario Electricity Market, March 4 2015’, available at http://www.ieso.ca/Pages/Participate/Market-Rules-and-Manuals-Library.aspx, accessed 01 April 2015.
24. 24)
  - 4. ‘Transmission Provider Technical Requirements for the Connection of Power Plants to the Hydro Québec Transmission System, February 2009’, available at http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/exigence_raccordement_fev_09_en.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
25. 25)
  - 25. Altin, M., Teodorescu, R., Jensen, B.B., et al: ‘Methodology for Assessment of Inertial Response from Wind Power Plants’. Proc. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, USA, July 2012.
26. 26)
  - 16. ‘System Impact Assessment Report, Cedar Point II Wind Power Project, June 4th, 2012’, available at http://www.ieso.ca/Documents/caa/CAA_2011-445_Final_Report.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.
27. 27)
  - 12. ‘Programme général des essais de validation et de performance des centrales éoliennes raccordées au réseau de distribution d'Hydro-Québec, March 2014’, available at http://www.hydroquebec.com/transenergie/fr/commerce/pdf/distribution-programme-essais-validation-performance-2014-03.pdf, accessed 01 April 2015.

Operational experiences with inertial response provided by type 4 wind turbines

References

Related content