© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
This study examines the potential role of large-scale photovoltaics (PV) generation in addressing the economic, energy security and environmental challenges facing the electricity industry. A Monte-Carlo-based generation portfolio modelling tool is employed to examine the value and impacts of different PV penetrations in future electricity generation portfolios under future uncertainty and multiple industry objectives of minimising expected future costs, cost uncertainty and CO2 emissions. The Australian National Electricity Market (NEM) facing highly uncertain future fossil-fuel prices, carbon price, plant capital costs and electricity demand was used as a case study. Hourly PV generations across diverse locations were simulated for different penetration levels. Modelling results show that, with relatively modest carbon prices, increased PV penetration leads to not only reductions in cost uncertainties and greenhouse gas emissions, but also the overall industry generation costs. This would greatly enhance the value and thus encourage investment in large-scale solar PV, even when the transmission cost estimates were included. The value of PV generation in future generation portfolios is also influenced by the mix of generation technologies. The findings from this study can assist in energy and climate policy decision making in the electricity industry, particularly with regard to large-scale PV generation and carbon pricing.
References
-
-
1)
-
3. IRENA: ‘Solar photovoltaics’ (International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2012).
-
2)
-
4. Georgitsioti, T., Pearsall, N., Forbes, I.: ‘Simplified levelised cost of the domestic photovoltaic energy in the UK: the importance of the feed-in tariff scheme’,IET Renew. Power Gener., 2014, 8, (6), pp. 451–458 (doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2013.0241).
-
3)
-
4. Ummels, B., Pelgrum, E., Kling, W.: ‘Integration of large-scale wind power and use of energy storage in the Netherlands’ electricity supply’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2008, 2, (1), pp. 34–46 (doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg:20070056).
-
4)
-
6. Jansen, J.C., Beurskens, L.W.M.: ‘Portfolio analysis of the future dutch generating mix’, in Bazilian, M., Roques, F. (Eds.): ‘Analytical methods for energy diversity and security: a tribute to Shimon Awerbuch’ (Elsevier, 2008).
-
5)
-
9. Elliston, B., MacGill, I., Diesendorf, M.: ‘Comparing least cost scenarios for 100% renewable electricity with low emission fossil fuel scenarios in the Australian national electricity market’, Renew. Energy, 2014, 66, (0), pp. 196–204 (doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.12.010).
-
6)
-
14. Australia Government: ‘Summary of solar PV installations’, .
-
7)
-
10. Lin, J.: ‘Potential impact of solar energy penetration on PJM electricity market’, IEEE Syst. J., 2012, 6, (2), pp. 205–212 (doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2011.2162885).
-
8)
-
3. IRENA: ‘Solar photovoltaics’ (International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2012).
-
9)
-
16. AER: ‘State of the energy market 2014’ (Australian Energy Regulator, 2014).
-
10)
-
2. REN21: ‘Renewables 2014 global status report’, renewable energy policy network for the 21st century (World Watch Institute, 2014).
-
11)
-
7. Vithayasrichareon, P., MacGill, I.F.: ‘A Monte Carlo based decision-support tool for assessing generation portfolios in future carbon constrained electricity industries’, Energy Policy, 2012, 41, pp. 374–392 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.060).
-
12)
-
18. Vithayasrichareon, P., MacGill, I.F.: ‘Portfolio assessments for future generation investment in newly industrializing countries – a case study of Thailand’, Energy, 2012, 44, (1), pp. 1044–1058 (doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.042).
-
13)
-
29. Vithayasrichareon, P., MacGill, I.F.: ‘Incorporating short-term operational plant constraints into assessments of future electricity generation portfolios’, Appl. Energy, 2014, 128, pp. 144–155 (doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.052).
-
14)
-
25. Awerbuch, S., Yang, S.: ‘Efficient electricity generating portfolios for Europe: maximizing energy security and climate change mitigation’, in Bazilian, M., Roques, F. (Eds.): ‘Analytical methods for energy diversity and security: a tribute to Shimon Awerbuch’ (Elsevier, 2008).
-
15)
-
21. AEMO: ‘2011 national transmission network development plan’ (Australian Energy Market Operator, 2011).
-
16)
-
19. Delarue, E., De Jonghe, C., Belmans, R., et al: ‘Applying portfolio theory to the electricity sector: energy versus power’, Energy Econ., 2011, 33, (1), pp. 12–23 (doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.05.003).
-
17)
-
1. IEA: ‘World energy outlook 2011’ (International Energy Agency, 2011).
-
18)
-
22. AEMO: ‘National electricity market (NEM) data’ (Australian Energy Market Operator, 2010).
-
19)
-
11. Denholm, P., Margolis, R.M.: ‘Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in traditional electric power systems’, Energy Policy, 2007, 35, (5), pp. 2852–2861 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.014).
-
20)
-
28. Australian Treasury: ‘Strong growth, low pollution: modelling a carbon price’ (Australian Government, 2011).
-
21)
-
20. BREE: ‘Australian energy technology assessment 2012’ (Australian Government, 2012).
-
22)
-
17. Markowitz, H.: ‘Portfolio selection’, J. Finance, 1952, 7, (1), pp. 77–91.
-
23)
-
8. Vithayasrichareon, P., MacGill, I.F.: ‘Assessing the value of wind generation in future carbon constrained electricity industries’, Energy Policy, 2013, 53, pp. 400–412 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.002).
-
24)
-
24. Vithayasrichareon, P.: ‘Portfolio-based decision-support tool for generation investment and planning in uncertain and low-carbon future electricity industries’. PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, 2012.
-
25)
-
26. IEA: ‘Electricity information 2012’ (International Energy Agency, 2012).
-
26)
-
27. AEMO: ‘Electricity statement of opportunities for the national electricity market’ (Australian Energy Market Operator, 2011).
-
27)
-
23. NREL: ‘System advisor model (SAM)’, .
-
28)
-
13. Geoscience Australia: ‘Australian energy resource assessment’ (Geoscience Australia and ABARE, 2010).
-
29)
-
15. Clean Energy Council: ‘Clean energy Australia report 2014’ (Clean Energy Council, 2014).
-
30)
-
5. Awerbuch, S.: ‘Portfolio-based electricity generation planning: policy implications for renewables and energy security’, Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change, 2006, 11, (3), pp. 693–710 (doi: 10.1007/s11027-006-4754-4).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0051
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0051
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6