Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Multi-task control strategy for grid-tied inverters based on conservative power theory

ln recent years, the concept of decentralising power generation through the deployment of distributed generators (DGs) has been widely accepted and applied, driven by the growing market of renewable energy sources. These DGs are normally equipped with a switching power interface, acting as front end with the grid. This paper proposes a multi-task control strategy for distributed generation systems that simultaneously allows the DG to inject the available energy, as well as to work as a voltage drop compensator or as an active power filter, mitigating load current disturbances and improving power quality of the grid. The main contribution of the proposed system, with respect to other solutions in the literature, is that the proposed control loops are based on the Conservative Power Theory decompositions. This choice provides decoupled power and current references for the inverter control, offering a very flexible, selective and powerful control strategy for the DG. The paper also discusses the choice of the current waveform for injecting/absorbing active power into/from the grid, and both sinusoidal and resistive references have been compared in terms of damping capability. Finally, simulation and experimental results are provided in order to validate the proposed functionalities of the DG control system.

References

    1. 1)
      • 22. Ogata, K.: ‘Modern control engineering’ (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2010, 5th edn.).
    2. 2)
      • 21. Brandão, D.I., Marafão, F.P., Simões, M.G., Pomilio, J.A.: ‘Considerations on the modeling and control scheme of grid connected inverter with voltage support capability’. Brazilian Power Electronics Conf., 2013.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 23. Mattavelli, P., Buso, S.: ‘Digital control in power electronics’ (Morgan & Claypool, Colorado, USA, 2006, 1st edn.).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 11. Ortjohann, E., Lingemann, M., Mohd, A., et al: ‘A general architecture for modular smart inverters’. IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics, 2008, pp. 15251530.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 17. Paredes, H.K.M.: ‘Conservative power theory: a new approach to cooperative control of power conditioners and considerations regarding to responsibility assignment’. PhD thesis, State University of Campinas, 2011, (in Portuguese).
    13. 13)
      • 4. Macken, K.J.P., Bollen, M.H.J., Belmans, R.J.M.: ‘Cost-effectiveness of distributed power quality compensation’. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2003, pp. 11301135.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 2. International Energy Outlook 2013: ‘U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)’. Available at http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/, accessed April 2014.
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 14. Tenti, P., Costabeber, A., Mattavelli, P.: ‘Improving power quality and distribution efficiency in micro-grids by cooperative control of switching power interfaces’. Int. Power Electronics Conf., 2010, pp. 472479.
    27. 27)
      • 24. Chen, Z., Blaabjerg, F., Pedersen, J.K.: ‘Harmonic resonance damping with a hybrid compensation system in power systems with dispersed generation’. IEEE Power Electronics Specialist Conf., 2004, pp. 30703076.
    28. 28)
      • 19. Marafão, F.P., Deckmann, S.M., Pomilio, J.A., Machado, R.Q.: ‘Selective disturbance compensation and comparison of active filtering strategies’. IEEE Int. Conf. on Harmonics and Quality of Power, 2002, pp. 484489.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0065
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0065
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address