Price signals have been suggested to bring about greater demand side flexibility and thus support the integration of variable sources of energy, such as wind. A conflict exists between keeping these signals simple for consumers, while making responses appropriate for increasingly complex supply–demand balancing dynamics in future. This study reviews some of the demand responses observed in time-of-use (ToU) tariff trials and assesses their effectiveness in scenarios with higher levels of wind. The authors simulate wholesale real-time prices for high-wind scenarios as a benchmark tariff. Simple tariff structures are compared against real-time prices for the extent to which they can ‘nudge’ demand in the ‘right direction’. They present results which suggest that even in high-wind scenarios, simple ToU tariffs could have a beneficial effect on overall system costs. The load shifting and reduction behaviour observed under ToU trials could lower energy costs by between 4 and 6% without the need for complex price signals.

References

1. 1)
  - 11. Higginson, S., Thomson, M., Bhamra, T.: ‘For the times they are a – change in: the impact of shifting energy-use practices in time and space’, Local Environment, 2014, 19, (5), pp. 520–538, (doi: 10.1080/13549839.2013.802459).
2. 2)
  - 22. Redpoint: ‘Dynamics of GB Generation Investment’. Technical Report. BERR, Available on: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file38972.pdf, 2007.
3. 3)
  - 30. Darby, S.J., McKenna, E.: ‘Social implications of residential demand response in cool temperate climates’, Energy Policy, 2012, 49, pp. 759–769 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.026).
4. 4)
  - 1. DEFRA: ‘United kingdom national emission reduction plan for implementation of the revised large combustion plants directive (2001/80/EC)’, Update No. 7. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra), 2012.
5. 5)
  - 12. Darby, S.J., Pisica, I.: ‘Focus on electricity tariffs: experience and exploration of different charging schemes’. ECEEE Summer Study Proc., 2013, pp. 2321–2331.
6. 6)
  - 2. Ofgem: ‘Electricity capacity assessment’, Ofgem report to Government 126/12. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets Available on: http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Markets/WhlMkts/monitoring-energy-security, 2012 [Accessed: 9 January 2013].
7. 7)
  - 10. Short, J., Infield, D., Freris, L.: ‘Stabilization of grid frequency through dynamic demand control’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (17), pp. 387–405.
8. 8)
  - 8. Wardle, R., Davison, P.: ‘Initial load and generation profiles from CLNR monitoring trials’. SDRC Report, The University of Durham, 2012.
9. 9)
  - 15. Ofgem: ‘Supply companies failing consumers: Ofgem proposes radical overhaul’, Press Release R/9, Office of the Gas and Electricity Markets, 2011.
10. 10)
  - 24. National Grid: ‘Metered half-hourly electricity demands’. Available on: http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Data/Demand+Data/, 2012.
11. 11)
  - 17. McKerracher, C., Torriti, J.: ‘Energy consumption feedback in perspective: integrating Australian data to meta-analyses on in-home displays’, Energy Efficiency, 2012, pp. 1–19.
12. 12)
  - 23. Elexon: ‘Elexon Portal’, Operational Data. Elexon, 2013.
13. 13)
  - 21. Cox, J.: ‘Impact of intermittency: How wind variability could change the shape of the British and Irish electricity markets’. Technical Report, Pöyry Energy, Oxford, 2009.
14. 14)
  - 7. CER: ‘Electricity smart metering customer behaviour trials findings report’. Information Paper CER11080a, The Commission for Energy Regulation, 2011.
15. 15)
  - 14. Star, A., Isaacson, M., Haeg, D., Kotewa, L., Energy, C.: ‘The dynamic pricing mousetrap: Why isn't the world beating down our door?’ ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 2010, pp. 257–268.
16. 16)
  - 20. Green, R., Vasilakos, N.: ‘Market behaviour with large amounts of intermittent generation’, Energy Policy, 2010, 38, pp. 3211–3220 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.038).
17. 17)
  - 3. Radcliffe, J.: ‘Delivering flexibility options for the energy system: priorities for innovation’. Technical Report, Energy Research Partnership, 2012.
18. 18)
  - A.J. Roscoe , G. Ault . Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real-time electricity pricing and demand response. IET Renew. Power Gener. , 369 - 382
19. 19)
  - 4. Strbac, G., Aunedi, M., Pudjianto, D., Djapic, P., Gammons, S., Druce, R.: ‘Understanding the balancing challenge’. Report for the department of energy and climate change, Imperial College London and NERA Economic ConsultingAvailable on: http://www.nera.com/67_7827.htm, 2012a, [Accessed: 15 January 2013].
20. 20)
  - 6. Strbac, G., Aunedi, M., Pudjianto, D., et al: ‘Strategic assessment of the role and value of energy storage systems in the UK low carbon energy future’. Report for the Carbon Trust, Imperial College London, 2012b.
21. 21)
  - 9. Borenstein, S., Holland, S.: ‘On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices’, RAND J. Econ., 2005, 36, pp. 469–493.
22. 22)
  - 18. Torriti, J.: ‘Demand side management for the European supergrid: Occupancy variances of European single-person households’, Energy Policy, 2012, 44, pp. 199–206 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.039).
23. 23)
  - 19. Grünewald, P., Cockerill, T., Contestabile, M., Pearson, P.: ‘The role of large scale storage in a GB low carbon energy future: issues and policy challenges’, Energy Policy, 2011, 39, pp. 4807–4815 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.040).
24. 24)
  - 25. EirGrid: ‘System Demand’. System Demand Tabular Data. EirGrid plc., 2013.
25. 25)
  - 13. Dütschke, E., Paetz, A.G.: ‘Dynamic electricity pricing – which programs do consumers prefer?’, Energy Policy, 2013, 59, pp. 226–234 (doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.025).
26. 26)
  - 26. UK Meteorological Office: ‘MIDAS land surface stations data (1853-current)’. Database. British Atmospheric Data Centre (BADC), 2006, Available on: http://www.badc.nerc.ac.uk/data/ukmo-midas [Accessed: 10 July 2012].

Keep it simple: time-of-use tariffs in high-wind scenarios

References

Related content