access icon free Constraints of instantaneous reactive power pq theory

The instantaneous reactive power (IRP) pq theory can be acknowledged as the first concept that provided fundamentals for switching compensator control and very often such a control is satisfactory. There are situations when this control can result in objectionable effects, however. Instantaneous active and reactive powers, p and q, defined in the IRP pq theory, were introduced with the emphasis that the definitions of these powers are valid for any three-phase system, without any constraints as to the system properties with respect to the load structure and the supply voltages and load currents waveform. This may imply a conclusion that the instantaneous powers p and q specify the power properties of the three-phase systems regardless of such systems properties. This assurance regarding the lack of constraints has contributed to the dissemination of the IRP pq theory, especially as a fundamental of the algorithms for switching compensator control. This study shows that such a conclusion has no ground, however. In fact, only at very specific properties of the three-phase system some conclusions on its power properties can be derived from the values of the instantaneous active and reactive powers. Also, it shows that the IRP pq theory identifies the power properties of the three-phase loads correctly only on the condition that such loads are supplied with symmetrical and sinusoidal voltage.

Inspec keywords: compensation; time-varying systems; reactive power control

Other keywords: power properties; IRP p-q theory; switching compensator control; sinusoidal voltage; load structure; symmetrical voltage; supply voltages; three-phase system; instantaneous reactive power p-q theory; load currents waveform

Subjects: Power system control; Control of electric power systems; Time-varying control systems; Power and energy control

References

    1. 1)
      • 11. Valouch, V.Muller, Z.Svec, J.Tlusty, J.: ‘Evaluation of IRP, FDB, SD and generalized non-active power theories’. Proc. of 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Israel, 978–1–4673–8/12/$31.00, 2012.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 21. Czarnecki, L.S.: ‘Comparison of the instantaneous reactive power p-q theory with theory of currents’ physical components’, Arch. Elektrotech., 2004, 85, (1), pp. 2128.
    7. 7)
      • 18. Watanabe, E.M., Akagi, H., Aredes, M.: ‘Instantaneous p-q power theory for compensating nonsinusoidal systems’, Prz. Elektrotech., 2008, R84, (6), pp. 2837.
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 12. Xu, F., Tolbert, L.M., Xu, Y.: ‘Critical evaluation of FDB, PQ and generalized non-active power theories’. Proc. of the European Power Electronics (EPE) Conf., Birmingham, 2011.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 10. Paredes, H.K.M., Marafao, F.P., da Silva, L.C.P.: ‘A comparative analysis of FBD, PQ, and CPT current decompositions – Part I: three-phase three-wire systems’. Proc. of IEEE Bucharest Power Tech. Conf., 978-1-4673-2235-7/09/$25.00, 2009.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • 16. Monteiro, L.F., Alfonso, J.L., Pinto, J.G., Watanabe, E.M., Aredes, M., Akagi, H.: ‘Compensation algorithms based on the p-q and CPC theories for switching compensators in micro-grids’. Proc. of COBEP 09 Power Electronics Conf., Brazilian, 2009, pp. 3240DOI: 10.1109/ COCEP.2009.5347593.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 20. Akagi, H., Watanabe, E.M., Aredes, M.: ‘Instantaneous power theory and applications to power conditioning’ (John Wiley & Sons, 2007).
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 14. Bitoleanu, A., Popescu, M.: ‘How can the IRP p-q theory be applied for active filtering under nonsinusoidal voltage operation’, Prz. Elektrotech., 2011, 87, (1), pp. 6771.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-pel.2013.0579
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-pel.2013.0579
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading