Improved bit error rate evaluation for optically pre-amplified free-space optical communication systems in turbulent atmosphere

Improved bit error rate evaluation for optically pre-amplified free-space optical communication systems in turbulent atmosphere

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Optoelectronics — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The use of an optical pre-amplifier at the receiver of free-space optical (FSO) communication systems necessitates the consideration of both turbulence and amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in performance modelling. Until now, this problem has been typically approached by the use of a Gaussian approximation (GA) for the conditional probability of error with averaging then performed using the received irradiance probability density function (PDF) (governed by scintillation). However, the GA is deficient as it only uses the first two moments. Moment generating function (MGF) techniques, notably the Chernoff bound (CB) and modified Chernoff bound (MCB), are used to evaluate the bit error rate performance of an optically pre-amplified FSO system in the presence of both atmospheric turbulence and ASE noise. The MGF-based methods incorporate a fuller statistical description of the signal and noise processes encountered in the optically pre-amplified case when compared to the GA. The lognormal, gamma–gamma, K and negative exponential distributions have been used to characterise the weak, moderate, strong and saturated turbulence regimes. The MCB gives the tightest bound upon the BER compared to the CB, particularly at lower gains, and, as it also can be exceeded by the GA at higher gains, it is a logical method to use in general.


    1. 1)
      • L.C. Andrews , R.L. Phillips . (2005) Laser beam propagation through random media.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • S. Karp , R.M. Gagliardi , S.E. Moran , L.B. Stotts . (1988) Optical channels: fibers clouds water and the atmosphere.
    5. 5)
      • Andrews, L.C., Phillips, R.L.: `Free space optical communication link and atmospheric effects: single aperture and arrays', Proc. SPIE in Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XVI, San Jose, CA, 5338, p. 265–275, no. 16.
    6. 6)
      • Kiasaleh, K.: `Performance analysis of free-space on-off-keying optical communication systems impaired by turbulence', Proc. SPIE in Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies XIV, January 2002, San Jose, CA, 4635, p. 150–161.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Cao, Q.L., Brandt-Pearce, M., Wilson, S.G.: `Free space optical MIMO system using PPM modulation and a single optical amplifier', Second Int. Conf. on Communications and Networking, August 2007, Shanghai, China, 1, p. 1113–1117.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • Chen, C., Yang, H., Jiang, H., Fan, J., Han, C., Ding, Y.: `Mitigation of turbulence-induced scintillation noise in free-space optical communication links using kalman filter', IEEE Congress on Image and Signal Processing, May 2008, Hainan, China, 5, p. 470–473.
    19. 19)
      • Akella, J., Yuksel, M., Kalyanaraman, S.: `Multi-channel communication in free-space optical networks for the last-mile', Proc. 15th IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, June 2007, Princeton, NJ, p. 43–48.
    20. 20)
      • Ghassemlooy, Z., Popoola, W.O., Leitgeb, E.: `Free-space optical communication using subcarrier modulation in gamma–gamma atmospheric turbulence', Ninth Int. Conf. on Transparent Optical Networks, July 2007, Rome, Italy, 13, p. 156–160.
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • M. Nakagami . (1960) The m-distribution – a general formula of intensity distribution of rapid fading, Statistical methods in radio wave propagation.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address