Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Subjective strain estimation depending on driving manoeuvres and traffic situation

Subjective strain estimation depending on driving manoeuvres and traffic situation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Access to current workload is regarded as crucial for new driver assistance systems that aim at optimising drivers' workload in addition to their specific functionalities (e.g. coordinate, prioritise information). As stress factors change dynamically within the driving context, workload assessment should be dynamic and continuous rather than discrete. Here, the effects of two dynamically changing stress factors (traffic density and different demands within the manoeuvre ‘entering the motorway’) on workload are examined. The aim of the study is to analyse whether the influence of these stress factors on workload can be measured using a continuous subjective rating method. The results demonstrate that the use of the subjective rating method allowed the assessment of detailed information on the influence of varying stress factors on subjective strain. Furthermore, the significant interaction between the stress factors demonstrated the importance of precise description of the relations among different dynamically changing stress factors and resulting subjective driver strain. By integrating the current findings with results from the previous studies, the wider aim of the research, the development of a qualitative and quantitative model of stress and strain, is discussed.

References

    1. 1)
      • T.G. Hicks , W.W. Wierwille . Comparison of five mental workload assessment procedures in a moving-base driving simulator. Hum. Factors , 129 - 143
    2. 2)
      • Jordan, C.S.: `Experimental study of the effects of an instantaneous self assessment workload recorder on task performance', Report DRA/TM(CAD5)92011, 1992, Defence Evaluation & Research Agency.
    3. 3)
      • D. De Waard , M. Jessurun , F.J.J.M. Steyvers , P.T.F. Raggatt , K.A. Brookhuis . Effect of road layout and road environment on driving performance, drivers’ physiology and road appreciation. Ergonomics , 1395 - 1407
    4. 4)
      • C.D. Wickens , J.G. Hollands . (1999) Engineering psychology and human performance.
    5. 5)
      • Knake-Langhorst, S., Schießl, C.: `Local traffic condition –improvement of a vehicle based measurement approach', 6thEuropean Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems and Services, June 2007, Aalborg, Denmark.
    6. 6)
      • D. De Waard . (1996) The measurement of drivers’ mental workload.
    7. 7)
      • W.A. MacDonald , E.R. Hoffman . Review of relationships between steering wheel reversal rate and driving task demand. Hum. Factors , 733 - 739
    8. 8)
      • S. Becker , M. Brockmann , E. Bruckmayr , O. Hofmann , R. Krause , A. Mertens . (1995) Telefonieren am Steuer.
    9. 9)
      • Girard, J.M., Wilczyk, M., Barloy, Y., Simon, P., Popieul, J.C.: `Towards an on-line assessment of subjective driver workload', Driving Simulator Conf., 2005, Orlando, USA, p. 382–391.
    10. 10)
      • R. Bernotat . Operation functions in vehicle control. Ergonomics , 3 , 353 - 377
    11. 11)
      • M. Vollrath , C. Schießl , T. Altmüller , M. Dambier , C. Kornblum . (2005) Erkennung von Fahrmanövern als Indikator für Belastung des Fahrers.
    12. 12)
      • Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985, Washington DC.
    13. 13)
      • H. Alm , L. Nilsson . The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Acc. Anal. Prev. , 5 , 707 - 715
    14. 14)
      • DIN EN ISO 10075-1: Ergonomische Grundlagen bezüglich psychischer Arbeitsbelastung, 2000.
    15. 15)
      • Farmer, E.W., Jordan, C.S., Belyavin, A.J., Bunting, A.J., Tattersall, A.J., Jones, D.M.: `Dimensions of operator workload', Report DRA/AS/MMI/CR95098/1, 1995, Defence Evaluation & Research Agency.
    16. 16)
      • R.D. O'Donnell , F.T. Eggemeier , K.R. Boff , L. Kaufmann , J.P. Thomas . (1986) Workload assessment methodology, Handbook of perception and human performance.
    17. 17)
      • O. Heller . Theorie und Praxis des Verfahrens der Kategorienunterteilung (KU).
    18. 18)
      • V.J. Gawron . (2000) Human performance measures handbook.
    19. 19)
      • Schießl, C., Vollrath, M., Altmüller, T., Dambier, M., Kornblum, C.: `What is strenuous? Driving itself or the driving situation?', 13thWorld Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems and Services, October 2006, London, Great Britain.
    20. 20)
      • C. Schießl . Continuous subjective strain measurement. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. , 2 , 161 - 169
    21. 21)
      • F.A. Muckler , S.A. Seven . Selecting performance measures: ‘objective’ versus ‘subjective’ measurement. Hum. Factors , 441 - 455
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its_20080024
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its_20080024
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address