Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Questionnaire surveys to evaluate user response to variable message signs in an urban network

Questionnaire surveys to evaluate user response to variable message signs in an urban network

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Add to cart
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)
Add to cart

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Published

The use of variable message signs (VMS) to provide traffic information is widespread, but success depends upon behavioural response to the sign messages. The research described here focuses on user acceptance of VMS located in an urban road network (Southampton, UK), and investigates the public's perceived effectiveness and usefulness of these signs through the use of revealed preference questionnaire surveys and travel diaries. Three hundred and sixty-five commuters regularly driving into Southampton from the outskirts of the city completed a travel diary for a 5-day period as well as a general questionnaire, and 660 infrequent travellers to Southampton completed the general questionnaire. The study showed that it is difficult to capture a meaningful sample size of respondents passing an ‘active’ VMS in a real-life incident scenario. Less than 1% of the commuter sample stated that they had diverted to an alternative route during the travel diary week as a result of VMS information, although this did correspond to 53% of those 45 drivers originally intending to travel past the incident location. The results showed that the VMS messages were well-understood and legible, and also indicated that a default VMS message reporting no problems in the network can indirectly affect a driver's route choice.

Inspec keywords: road traffic; human factors; driver information systems

Other keywords: user response evaluation; urban road network; public perceived effectiveness; questionnaire surveys; VMS messages; traffic information; driver route choice; ITS; variable message signs

Subjects: Traffic engineering computing; Ergonomic aspects of computing

References

    1. 1)
      • Jensen, M., Cluett, C., Wunderlich, K., DeBlasio, A., Sanchez, R.: `Metropolitan model deployment initiative Seattle evaluation report.', Report Number: FHWA-OP-00-020, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 2000, http://www.benefitcost.its.dot.gov/its/benecost.nsf/ID/A51D0DEA2F895841852569610051E2F1, Accessed 14/09/06.
    2. 2)
      • Haj-Salem, H., Sidiki, E., Cohen, S., Papageorgiou, M.: `Field trial results of VMS travel display on the corridor Périphérique of Paris', Proc. 3rd World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 1996, Orlando, USA.
    3. 3)
      • Chatterjee, K., Hounsell, N.B., Waterson, B.J., Firmin, P.E., Bonsall, P.W.: `Evaluation of the London driver information system: results from the CLEOPATRA study', Proc. IEE 10th Int. Conf. on Road Traffic Information and Control, 2000, London, p. 22–26, IEE Conference Publication No. 472.
    4. 4)
      • W. Barfield , M. Haselkorn , J. Spyridakis , L. Conquest . Integrating commuter information needs in the design of a motorist information system. Transp. Res. A , 71 - 78
    5. 5)
      • Barbier, M.: `Dynamic guidance using variable message signs', Proc. 6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 1999, Toronto, Canada.
    6. 6)
      • S. Peeta , J.L. Ramos . Driver response to variable message signs-based traffic information. IEE Proc. Intell. Transp. Syst. , 1 , 2 - 10
    7. 7)
      • Patten, M., Goulias, K., Pribyl, O.: `User perceptions of Advanced Traveller Information Systems on the Pennsylvania turnpike', Proc. 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 2002, Chicago, USA.
    8. 8)
      • Dudek, C.L., Huchingson, R.D.: `Manual on real-time motorist information displays', Report No. FHWA-IP-86-16, 1986.
    9. 9)
      • Durand-Raucher, Y.: `The ability of individuals to adjust their travel time behaviour. Examples of public response today and in the future', Proc. 5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 1998, Seoul, Korea.
    10. 10)
      • Dunn, W.M., Reiss, R.A., Latoski, S.P.: `Successful strategies for alternate route plan deployment', Proc. 81st Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, 2002, Washington, D.C.
    11. 11)
      • Lee, C., Ran, B., Barrett, B., Johnson, E.: `Evaluation of the driver decision-making process based on a VMS survey', Proc. 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 2002, Chicago, USA.
    12. 12)
      • , : `Final evaluation report and exploitation plan', EU Project No. TR1054, Deliverable No. 10.3, 1998.
    13. 13)
      • S. Mammar , A. Messmer , P. Jensen , M. Papageorgiou , H. Haj-Salem , L. Jensen . Automatic control of variable message signs in Aalborg. Transp. Res. C , 131 - 150
    14. 14)
      • Ramsay, E., Catchpole, J., Luk, J.: `An evaluation of VicRoads' drive time system', ARR 305, ARRB Transport Research Report, ISBN 0 86910 741 0, 1996.
    15. 15)
      • Remeijn, H.: `Levels of quality of service for VMS systems', Proc. 5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 1998, Seoul, Korea.
    16. 16)
      • Schouten, W.J.J.P., Van Lieshout, M.J., Spit, W.F.M.: `VMS in the Polder – the emergence of a standardized modular information system to control, support and promote initiatives for VMS in Holland in a flexible way', Proc. IEE 9th Int. Conf. on Road Traffic Information and Control, 1998, London, p. 222–226IEE Conference Publication No. 454, .
    17. 17)
      • C. Vick , B. Ron Pati . (1998) Commuter feedback: an important aspect of ongoing ITS deployments, Presented at the ITS Annual Meeting.
    18. 18)
      • Ando, A.: `What services do people want on ITS’?', Proc. 10th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 2003, Madrid, Spain.
    19. 19)
      • FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C, Schintler, L.: `Partners in motion and customer satisfaction in the Washington DC metropolitan area', 1999.
    20. 20)
      • `Results of demonstration of dynamic route guidance strategies', EU project TR 1012, 1999, Deliverable D10.
    21. 21)
      • Durand-Raucher, Y., Santucci, J.C.: `Socio-economic benefits of the Paris region policy, balanced between traffic management and information', Proc. 2nd World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 1995, Yokohama, Japan, p. 1883–1887.
    22. 22)
      • Tanabe, J., Kurauchi, F., Shimizu, M.: `Drivers' response to traffic and travel information of the Hanshin expressway', Proc. 4th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 1997, Berlin, Germany.
    23. 23)
      • Lindkvist, A.: `Motorist response to traffic reports on experienced incidents', Proc. 5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 1998, Seoul, Korea.
    24. 24)
      • Sussman, J.: `ITS: What we know now that we wish we knew then: a retrospective on the ITS 1992 strategic plan', Proc. 83rd Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, January 2004, Washington, D.C., USA.
    25. 25)
      • Rakas, J., Arrieta, J., Zhou, Y., Clements, S.: `Variable message signs study for Baltimore/Washington I-95 corridor', Proc. 8th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 2001, Sydney, Australia.
    26. 26)
      • Lappin, J.: `Advanced Traveller Information Services (ATIS): who are ATIS customers?', Proc. ATIS Data Collection Guidelines Workshop, 2000, Scottsdale, AZ.
    27. 27)
      • M.R. Wardman , P.W. Bonsall , J.D. Shires . Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference analysis investigation. Transp. Res. C , 6 , 389 - 405
    28. 28)
      • S. Peeta , J.L. Ramos , R. Pasupathy . Content of variable message signs and on-line driver behaviour. Transp. Res. Record , 102 - 108
    29. 29)
      • , U.S. Department of Transportation, , : `Assessment of ITS benefits early results', 1995, http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/JPODOCS/REPTS_TE/LG01!.PDF Accessed on 14/9/06.
    30. 30)
      • B.R. Durkop , C.L. Dudek . Texas driver understanding of abbreviations for Changeable Message Signs. Transp. Res. Record , 87 - 95
    31. 31)
      • Chatterjee, K., Hounsell, N.: `Evaluation of the London driver information system in the CLEOPATRA project', Proc. 6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 1999, Toronto, Canada.
    32. 32)
      • Burnett, G., Ross, T., Wevers, K.: `The use of landmarks for enhanced route guidance: the REGIONAL project', Proc. 7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 2000, Turin, Italy.
    33. 33)
      • A.J. Khattak , J.L. Schofer , F.S. Koppelman . Factors influencing commuters' en route diversion behaviour in response to delay. Transp. Res. Record , 125 - 136
    34. 34)
      • P. Bonsall , P. Firmin , M. Anderson , I. Palmer , P. Balmforth . Validating the results of a route choice simulator. Transp. Res. C , 6 , 371 - 387
    35. 35)
      • Chatterjee, K., Lyons, G.: `Coping with a crisis: lessons from the events of a year ago', PTRC – Proc. European Transport Conference, 2001, Cambridge, ISBN 0-86050-339-9.
    36. 36)
      • Lo, H.P., Lam, W.: `Some data issues in stated preference analysis', Proc. 9th World Conf. on Transport Research, 2001, Seoul, Korea.
    37. 37)
      • Richards, A., McDonald, M.: `Investigating the limits of the benefits provided by VMS in an urban network', To be presented at Proc. 86th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, January 2007, Washington, D.C, USA.
    38. 38)
      • Southampton City Council (2001): ‘Local Transport Plan 2001/2 to 2005/6’.
    39. 39)
      • Chadzopoulos, M., Mavrogeorgis, T., Hatoglou, G., Zahariadis, T., Megalooikonomou, M., Stassinopoulos, G.: `Advanced transport telematics systems for Ports: the Piraeus case', Proc. IFAC Transportation Systems Conference, 1997, Chania, Greece, 3, p. 1242–1248.
    40. 40)
      • Bovy, P.H.L.: `Traffic flooding the low countries: how the Dutch cope with motorway congestion', VK 2205.402, Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Section Report, 1998.
    41. 41)
      • Peng, Z., Guequierre, N., Blakeman, J.: `Motorist response to arterial variable message signs', Proc. 83rd Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, January 2004, Washington, D.C, USA.
    42. 42)
      • J. Swann , W.I. Routledge , J. Parker , S. Tarry . (1995) Results of practical applications of variable message signs (VMS): A64/A1 accident reduction scheme and Forth Estuary Driver Information and Control System (FEDICS), Proc. Seminar G, 23rd European Transport Forum University of Warwick.
    43. 43)
      • Eidswick, J., Mounce, J.: `SAFE-PASSAGE motorist communication system evaluation', Proc. 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 2002, Chicago, USA.
    44. 44)
      • Van Eeden, P.G.M.A., Van Lieshout, M.J., Van Der Mede, P.H.J., Van Ruremonde, A.A.H.M., Schouten, W.J.J.P.: `Dynamic route information in the Netherlands, effects and research', IEE Conference Publication No. 422, Proc. IEE 8th Int. Conf. on Road Traffic Monitoring and Control, 1996, London, p. 145–149.
    45. 45)
      • Wren, A.C., Laughlin, K.G.: `ROMANSE – monitoring and evaluating ITS', Proc. 4th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 1997, Berlin, Germany.
    46. 46)
      • Kurauchi, H., Tanaka, R.: `Dispersion of traffic flow through provision of travel time information on multiple routes', Proc. 2nd World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November 1995, Yokohama, Japan, p. 703–708.
    47. 47)
      • Durand-Raucher, Y.: `Information as a tool for modifying drivers' behaviour – example of the Paris region', Proc. 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems, December 1994, Paris, France, 6, p. 3101–3108.
    48. 48)
      • S. Tarry , A. Graham . The role of evaluation in ATT development. Traffic Eng. Control , 12 , 688 - 693
    49. 49)
      • Y. Yim , A.J. Khattak , J. Raw . Traveller response to new dynamic information sources: analysing corridor and areawide behavioural surveys. Transp. Res. Record , 66 - 75
    50. 50)
      • K. Wunderlich , M. Hardy , J. Larkin , V. Shah . (2001) On-time reliability impacts of Advanced Traveller Information Services (ATIS): Washington DC case study.
    51. 51)
      • Patten, M., Goulias, K., Pribyl, O.: `User perceptions of advanced traveller information systems on the Pennsylvania turnpike', Proc. 9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, October 2002, Chicago, USA.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its_20060046
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its_20060046
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address