Control design for stable connected cruise control systems to enhance safety and traffic efficiency

Control design for stable connected cruise control systems to enhance safety and traffic efficiency

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

To enhance safety and traffic efficiency, stability of a mixed human and connected cruise control (CCC) system is studied. The authors consider individual vehicle platoons, in which the tail CCC vehicle receives feedback from multiple human-driven vehicles ahead via vehicle-to-vehicle communications, with the objective of stability analysis and feedback control design. To deal with this, the transfer function theory is used. Simulations are also performed to evaluate impacts of the mixed human and CCC system on safety and traffic efficiency. Results show that the output bounds of the CCC feedback coefficients can be appropriately designed to keep local individual vehicle platoons stable for all possible vehicle speeds. The feedback coefficient has a larger design range and the required lower bound value decreases as the feedback length increases. Additionally, the system design would improve traffic safety and efficiency even at lower CCC vehicle penetration rates.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Mahmassani, H.S.: ‘50th anniversary invited article–autonomous vehicles and connected vehicle systems: flow and operations considerations’, Transp. Sci., 2016, 50, (4), pp. 11401162.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Idriz, A.F., Rachman, A.S.A., Baldi, S.: ‘Integration of auto-steering with adaptive cruise control for improved cornering behaviour’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 11, (10), pp. 667675.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Milanés, V., Shladover, S.E.: ‘Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data’, Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 2014, 48, pp. 285300.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Shladover, S.E., Nowakowski, C., Lu, X.Y., et al: ‘Cooperative adaptive cruise control: definitions and operating concepts’, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board., 2015, 2489, pp. 145152.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Chen, D., Ahn, S., Chitturi, M., et al: ‘Towards vehicle automation: roadway capacity formulation for traffic mixed with regular and automated vehicles’, Transp. Res. B Methodol., 2017, 100, pp. 196221.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Wang, Z., Wu, G., Barth, M.J.: ‘Developing a distributed consensus-based cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) system for heterogeneous vehicles with predecessor following topology’, J. Adv. Transp., 2017, Article ID 1023654.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Li, S.E., Qin, X., Zheng, Y., et al: ‘Distributed platoon control under topologies with complex eigenvalues: stability analysis and controller synthesis’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2017.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Ge, J.I., Orosz, G.: ‘Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback’, Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 2014, 46, pp. 4664.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Salvi, A., Santini, S., Valente, A.S.: ‘Design, analysis and performance evaluation of a third order distributed protocol for platooning in the presence of time-varying delays and switching topologies’, Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 2017, 80, pp. 360383.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Jia, D., Ngoduy, D.: ‘Platoon based cooperative driving model with consideration of realistic inter-vehicle communication’, Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 2016, 68, pp. 245264.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Orosz, G.: ‘Connected cruise control: modelling, delay effects, and nonlinear behaviour’, Vehicle Syst. Dyn., 2016, 54, (8), pp. 11471176.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Hoogendoorn, R., van Arem, B., Hoogendoorn, S.: ‘Automated driving, traffic flow efficiency, and human factors: literature review’, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board., 2014, 2422, pp. 113120.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Milakis, D., Van Arem, B., Van Wee, B.: ‘Policy and society related implications of automated driving: a review of literature and directions for future research’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 21, (4), pp. 324348.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Yang, C.D., Ozbay, K., Ban, X.: ‘Developments in connected and automated vehicles’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, 21, (4), pp. 251254.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: ‘Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations’, Phys. Rev. E, 2000, 62, (2), pp. 18051824.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Schönhof, M., et al: ‘Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance’, Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 2008, 16, (6), pp. 668683.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Kesting, A., Treiber, M., Helbing, D.: ‘Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity’, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2010, 368, (1928), pp. 45854605.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Ioannou, P., Xu, Z.: ‘Throttle and brake control system for automatic vehicle following’, Intell. Veh. Highway Syst., 1994, 1, (4), pp. 345377.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Li, K., Ioannou, P.: ‘Modeling of traffic flow of automated vehicles’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2004, 5, (2), pp. 99113.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Li, Y., Zhang, L., Peeta, S., et al: ‘A car-following model considering the effect of electronic throttle opening angle under connected environment’, Nonlinear Dyn.., 2016, 85, pp. 21152125.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Milanés, V., Shladover, S., Spring, J., et al: ‘Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 15, (1), pp. 296305.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Vogel, K.: ‘A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2003, 35, (3), pp. 427433.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Meng, Q., Weng, J.: ‘Evaluation of rear-end crash risk at work zone using work zone traffic data’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2011, 43, (4), pp. 12911300.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Oh, C., Kim, T.: ‘Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2010, 42, (6), pp. 18881893.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Minderhoud, M.M., Bovy, P.H.: ‘Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2001, 33, (1), pp. 8997.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Talebpour, A., Mahmassani, H.S.: ‘Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput’, Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol., 2016, 71, pp. 143163.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Qin, Y.Y., Wang, H.: ‘Stability analysis of connected vehicular platoon with multiple delayed feedbacke’. Proc. Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA, January 2018, pp. 17.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address