Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Network survivability and recoverability in urban rail transit systems under disruption

It is important for an urban rail transit system network to be resilient in the event of a disruption, and to be capable to recover in the shortest possible time. This study presents a holistic approach to analyse the survivability and recoverability of an urban rail–bus transit network during and after a disruption. A maximum survivability-minimum recovery time approach was formulated in this study to determine the number of affected passengers in the rail network during a disruption, the number of passengers who need to be transferred to alternate transport modes, and the recovery duration. A case study based on the Singapore urban mass rapid transit and bus networks is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the authors’ proposed framework. It was found from their analyses that the proposed framework could provide information on the state of rail network resilience given different disruption scenarios and estimate the recovery time after disruption occurrence.

References

    1. 1)
      • 10. Peeta, S., Salman, F.S., Gunnec, D., et al: ‘Pre-disaster investment decisions for strengthening a highway network’, Comput. Oper. Res., 2010, 37, (10), pp. 17081719.
    2. 2)
      • 1. Hua, W., Ong, G.P.: ‘Modelling disruptive events in Singapore mass rapid transit system’. 10th Asia Pacific Conf. Transportation and the Environment (APTE), 2016.
    3. 3)
      • 7. Manchester, J., Bonenfant, P., Newton, C.: ‘The evolution of transport network survivability’, IEEE Commun. Mag., 1999, 37, (8), pp. 4451.
    4. 4)
      • 19. An, S., Cui, N., Li, X., et al: ‘Location planning for transit-based evacuation under the risk of service disruptions’, Transp. Res. B, Methodol., 2013, 54, pp. 116.
    5. 5)
      • 4. Murray-Tuite, P.M.: ‘A comparison of transportation network resilience under simulated system optimum and user equilibrium conditions’. Proc. of the Winter Simulation Conf. 2006, WSC 06, 2006.
    6. 6)
      • 12. Ouyang, M., Duenas-Osorio, L.: ‘Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems’, Chaos, 2012, 22, (3), p. 033122.
    7. 7)
      • 6. Heegaard, P.E., Trivedi, K.S.: ‘Network survivability modeling’, Comput. Netw., 2009, 53, (8), pp. 12151234.
    8. 8)
      • 15. Zerbst, U., Beretta, S.: ‘Failure and damage tolerance aspects of railway components’, Eng. Failure Anal., 2011, 18, pp. 534542.
    9. 9)
      • 17. Lam, C.Y., Tai, K.: ‘Evaluating the reliability of infrastructure networks by resilience analysis’. IEEE Int. Conf. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2012, pp. 11651169.
    10. 10)
      • 8. Chen, D., Garg, S., Trivedi, K.S.: ‘Network survivability performance evaluation: a quantitative approach with applications in wireless Ad-Hoc networks’. Proc. of the 5th ACM Int. Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, 2002.
    11. 11)
      • 14. MacChi, M., Garetti, M., Centrone, D., et al: ‘Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis’, Rel. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2012, 104, pp. 7183.
    12. 12)
      • 22. Sun, L., Jin, J.G., Lee, D.-H., et al: ‘Demand-driven timetable design for metro services’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2014, 46, pp. 284299.
    13. 13)
      • 11. Rose, A.: ‘Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions’, Environ. Hazards, 2007, 7, (4), pp. 383398.
    14. 14)
      • 13. Pant, R., Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., et al: ‘Stochastic measures of resilience and their application to container terminals’, Comput. Ind. Eng., 2014, 70, pp. 183194.
    15. 15)
      • 9. Abdel-Rahim, A., Oman, P., Johnson, B., et al: ‘Survivability analysis of large-scale intelligent transportation system networks’, Transp. Res. Record, J. Transp. Res. Board, 2007, 2022, pp. 920.
    16. 16)
      • 3. Reggiani, A.: ‘Network resilience for transport security: some methodological considerations’, Transp. Policy, 2013, 28, pp. 6368.
    17. 17)
      • 16. Hong, L., Ouyang, M., Peeta, S., et al: ‘Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2015, 137, pp. 5868.
    18. 18)
      • 20. Cadarso, L., Marín, Á., Maróti, G.: ‘Recovery of disruptions in rapid transit networks’, Transp. Res. E, Log. Transp. Rev., 2013, 53, pp. 1533.
    19. 19)
      • 5. Henry, D., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E.: ‘Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2012, 99, pp. 114122.
    20. 20)
      • 18. Jin, J.G., Teo, K.M., Sun, L.: ‘Disruption response planning for an urban mass rapid transit network’. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2013.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Yen, J.Y.: ‘Finding the K shortest loopless paths in a network’, Manage. Sci., 1971, 17, (11), pp. 712716.
    22. 22)
      • 23. Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M.G.: ‘The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms’, Public Transp., 2009, 1, (4), pp. 275297.
    23. 23)
      • 2. Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E., Rocco, C.M.: ‘Resilience-based network component importance measures’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 2013, 117, pp. 8997.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0102
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0102
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address