access icon free Vehicle collision prediction at intersections based on comparison of minimal distance between vehicles and dynamic thresholds

Accurate collision prediction algorithms are important to provide drivers reliable warning messages. This study introduces a novel approach for collision prediction at intersections. The algorithm involves the use of an index called ‘minimal future distance (MFD)’, which is defined to be a future distance (FD) between the subject vehicle and the primary other vehicle, and a two-level dynamic threshold for performing the collision prediction task. Real-time vehicle motion information and surrounding road geometry are utilised to forecast FDs and identify MFD within an upcoming time horizon. The dynamic threshold in both emergency warning and normal warning situations consists of two parts, a vehicle heading direction-related part and a speed value-related part. Potential collisions are determined by the comparison of MFD with different dynamic thresholds in different driving scenarios. The combined use of vehicle real-time state and road geometry in the algorithm significantly increased the collision prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the use of dynamic thresholds ensured the promptness and robustness of the collision warning system. Simulation results show that the false positive rate and false negative rate of severe collisions at intersections can be robustly eliminated and those of marginal collisions can be kept low at 2.4 and 3.6%, respectively.

Inspec keywords: traffic engineering computing

Other keywords: normal warning situations; vehicle collision prediction algorithm; inertial navigation system; future distance; emergency warning; two-level dynamic threshold; minimal future distance; MFD; global positioning system

Subjects: Traffic engineering computing

References

    1. 1)
      • 3. Kwon, O., Lee, S., Kim, J., et al: ‘Collision prediction at intersection in sensor network environment’. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf., 2006.
    2. 2)
      • 13. Green, M.: ‘How long does it take to stop? Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times’, Transp. Hum. Factors, 2000, 2, pp. 195216.
    3. 3)
      • 8. Chan, C., Marco, D., Misener, J.: ‘Threat assessment of traffic moving toward a controlled intersection’. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., 2004, pp. 931936.
    4. 4)
      • 2. Huang, C., Lin, S., Yang, C., et al: ‘A collision pre-warning algorithm based on V2V communication’. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Ubiquitous Information Technologies & Applications, 2009, pp. 16.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Dabbour, E., Easa, S.: ‘Proposed collision warning system for right-turning vehicles at two-way stop-controlled rural intersections’. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicle Symp., 2009, pp. 929934.
    6. 6)
      • 17. Iowa FACE Report: ‘Diesel mechanic died in motor vehicle crash caused by distracted driving’, case ID: 2012 IA 041.
    7. 7)
      • 12. Tang, A., Yip, A.: ‘Collision avoidance timing analysis of DSRC-based vehicles’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2010, 42, pp. 182195.
    8. 8)
      • 11. Weidl, G., Breuel, G., Singhal, V.: ‘Collision risk prediction and warning at road intersections using an object oriented Bayesian network’. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2013, pp. 270277.
    9. 9)
      • 1. Miller, R., Huang, Q.: ‘An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system’. Proc. Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC), Birmingham, Alabama, 2002, pp. 317321.
    10. 10)
      • 7. Wenjuan, E.: ‘Research on vehicle conflict detection and resolution algorithm at unsignalized intersection’. Dissertation of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Jilin, 2012.
    11. 11)
      • 15. Ward, J., Agamennoni, G., Worrall, S., et al: ‘Extending time to collision for probabilistic reasoning in general traffic scenarios’, Transp. Res. C, Emerg. Technol., 2015, 51, pp. 6682.
    12. 12)
      • 10. Zhu, T., Xu, J., Bai, Y., et al: ‘A research on risk assessment and warning strategy for intersection collision avoidance system’. Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2009, pp. 16.
    13. 13)
      • 21. Tan, H., Huang, J.: ‘DGPS-based vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative collision warning: engineering feasibility viewpoints’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2006, 7, (4), pp. 415428.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Du, J.: ‘Study about vehicle safety distance based on vehicle to vehicle communication’. Master thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, China, 2012.
    15. 15)
      • 19. Wang, P., Wang, J., Chan, C., et al: ‘Trajectory prediction for turning vehicles at intersections by fusing vehicle dynamics and driver's future input estimation’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2016, 2602, pp. 6877.
    16. 16)
      • 22. Liu, J., Cai, B., Wang, Y., et al: ‘A lane level positioning-based cooperative vehicle conflict resolution algorithm for unsignalized intersection collisions’, Comput. Electr. Eng., 2013, 39, pp. 13811389.
    17. 17)
      • 16. The Highway Code: ‘Rule 126’, Gov.uk.
    18. 18)
      • 9. Salim, F., Loke, S., Rakotonirainy, A., et al: ‘Collision pattern modeling and real-time collision detection at road intersections’. Proc. Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf., 2009, pp. 161166.
    19. 19)
      • 20. Shladover, S., Tan, S.: ‘Analysis of vehicle positioning accuracy requirements for communication-based cooperative collision warning’, J. Intell. Transp. Syst.: Tech. Plann. Oper., 2006, 10, (3), pp. 131140.
    20. 20)
      • 6. Huang, C., Lin, S.: ‘An early warning algorithm for vehicles based on V2V communication’, Int. J. Commun. Syst., 2012, 25, pp. 779795.
    21. 21)
      • 4. Dabbour, E., Easa, S.: ‘Perceptual framework for a modern left-turn collision warning system’, Int. J. Appl. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2009, 5, (1), pp. 814.
    22. 22)
      • 18. Atev, S., Arumugam, H., Masoud, O., et al: ‘A vision-based approach to collision prediction at traffic intersections’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2005, 6, (4), pp. 416423.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0065
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0065
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading