Analysis of drivers’ performance in response to potential collision with pedestrians at urban crosswalks

Analysis of drivers’ performance in response to potential collision with pedestrians at urban crosswalks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Protection of vulnerable road users has been an increasingly important requirement for today's autonomous vehicles. Analysis of drivers’ response to potential collision with pedestrians can provide guidance for vehicle evasive manoeuvre and data support for traffic collision modelling. Field traffic data were collected by video recording and image processing at urban midblock crosswalks in Beijing, China and Munich, Germany. The drivers’ response to vehicle–pedestrian conflict is discussed by deceleration and acceleration phases considering the lane-based kinematics of vehicles. Some basic characteristics describing the driver behaviour in an evasive process are statistically analysed, including the yielding decision, space history of deceleration, deceleration rate choice, and accelerating behaviour. Results show significant differences in drivers’ yielding decisions. In addition, the onset of braking and the trend of the space history of average deceleration rate during the drivers’ approaching process have been quantitatively proposed. The contributing factors to driver's yielding behaviour are analysed by the Binary Logit Model. The behavioural differences address the needs to make intercultural adaptation when introducing new autonomous vehicle technologies to developing countries. This study provides a basis for establishing evasive decision corrections for drivers or driverless vehicles.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Traffic Management Bureau’: ‘Annual report of the China road traffic accidents statistics’, Ministry of Public Security of People's Republic of China (MPSPRC), 2013..
    2. 2)
      • 2. Cities Try to Improve Crosswalk Safety’. Available at crosswalk_N.htm, accessed 24 November 2016..
    3. 3)
      • 3. Jiang, X., Wang, W., Bengler, K.: ‘Intercultural analyses of time-to-collision in vehicle–pedestrian conflict on an urban midblock crosswalk’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., 2015, 16, (2), pp. 10481053.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Wang, W., Guo, H., Gao, Z., et al: ‘Individual differences of pedestrian behaviour in midblock crosswalk and intersection’, Int. J. Crashworthiness, 2011, 16, (1), pp. 19.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Horst, V.D., Hogema, J.: ‘Time to Collision and collision avoidance systems’. Proc. 6th ICTCT Workshop – Safety Evaluation of Traffic Systems: Traffic Conflicts and Other Measures, Salzburg, Austria, 1993, pp. 109121.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Horst, V.D.: ‘A time-based analysis of road user behavior in normal and critical encounters’. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1990.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Sobhani, A., Young, W., Bahrololoom, S., et al: ‘Calculating time-to-collision for analysing right turning behaviour at signalised intersections’, Road Transport Res., 2014, 22, (3), pp. 4961.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Schwarz, C.: ‘On computing time-to-collision for automation scenarios’, Transport. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 2014, 27, Part B, pp. 283294.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Gettman, D., Head, L.: ‘Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2003, 1840, pp. 104115.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Mohamed, E., Tarek, S.: ‘Simulated traffic conflicts: do they accurately represent field-measured conflicts?’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2015, 2514, pp. 4857.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Rosén, E., Stigson, H., Sander, U.: ‘Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2011, 43, (1), pp. 2533.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Kröyer, H.R.G., Jonsson, T., Várhelyi, A.: ‘Relative fatality risk curve to describe the effect of change in the impact speed on fatality risk of pedestrians struck by a motor vehicle’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2014, 62, pp. 143152.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Bella, F., Silvestri, M.: ‘Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2015, 83, pp. 111124.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Geruschat, D.R., Hassan, S.E.: ‘Driver behavior in yielding to sighted and blind pedestrians at roundabouts’, J. Visual. Impair. Blin., 2005, 99, (5), pp. 286302.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Schroeder, B.J., Rouphail, N.M.: ‘Event-based modeling of driver yielding behavior at unsignalized crosswalks’, J. Transport. Eng., 2011, 137, (7), pp. 455465.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Houten, H.V.: ‘The effects of prompting signs alone, pavement markings alone and signs and pavement markings together on motorist's yielding in advance of marked crosswalk: a component analysis’. Transportation Research Board 83th Annual Meeting CD-ROM, Washington, DC, 2004.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Gómez, R.A., Samuel, S., Gerardino, L.R., et al: ‘Do advance yield markings increase safe driver behaviors at unsignalized, marked midblock crosswalks? Driving simulator study’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2011, 2264, pp. 2733.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Fishera, D., Lisandra, G.V.: ‘Advance yield markings and drivers’ performance in response to multiple-threat scenarios at mid-block crosswalks’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2012, 44, (1), pp. 3541.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Ragland, D., Banerjee, I., Shladover, S.E., et al: ‘Impact of pedestrian presence on movement of left-turning vehicles: method, preliminary results & possible use in intersection decision support’. Transportation Research Board 84th Annual Meeting Paper No. 05–2199, Washington, DC, 2005.
    20. 20)
      • 20. Alhajyaseen, W.K.M., Asano, M., Nakamura, H.: ‘Left-turn gap acceptance models considering pedestrian movement characteristics’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 2013, 50, (50), pp. 175185.
    21. 21)
      • 21. Aronsson, K.: ‘Speed characteristics of urban streets based on driver behavior studies and simulation’. Doctoral thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Varhelyi, A.: ‘Driver speed behavior at a zebra crossing: a case study’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 1998, 30, (6), pp. 731743.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Bourquin, E., Emerson, R.W., Sauerburger, D.: ‘Conditions that influence drivers’ yielding behavior for uncontrolled intersections’, J. Vis. Impair. Blind., 2011, 105, (11), pp. 760769.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Persson, H.: ‘Communication between pedestrian and car drivers’ (Lund University, Sweden, 1988).
    25. 25)
      • 25. Katz, A., Zaidel, D., Elgrishi, A.: ‘An experimental study of driver and pedestrian intersection during the crossing conflict’, Hum. Factors, 1975, 17, pp. 514527.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Himanen, V., Kulmala, R.: ‘An application of logit models in analyzing the behavior of pedestrians and car drivers on pedestrian crossings’, Accid. Anal. Prev., 1988, 20, (3), pp. 187197.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Schneemann, F., Gohl, I.: ‘Analysing driver-pedestrian interaction at crosswalks: A contribution to autonomous driving in urban environments’. 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp., Gothenburg, Sweden, 2016, pp. 3843.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Coelingh, E., Eidehall, A., Bengtsson, M.: ‘Collision warning with full auto brake and pedestrian detection – a practical example of automatic emergency braking’. Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems IEEE, Madeira Island, Portugal, 2010, pp. 155160.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Kaparias, I., Bell, M.G.H., Greensted, J., et al: ‘Development and implementation of a vehicle–pedestrian conflict analysis method: adaptation of a vehicle–vehicle technique’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2010, 2198, (1), pp. 7582.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Ismail, K., Sayed, T., Saunier, N., et al: ‘Automated analysis of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts using video data’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2009, 2140, pp. 4454.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address