access icon free Public service approach to car-sharing in mid-sized towns: the example of Belfort (France)

Car-sharing (CS) is an alternative to private cars able to change mobility customs and to participate in the greenhouse gas emission reduction. The administration board of the Belfort bus operator decided in January 2013 to build-up a visible and attractive CS service following a public service idea and integrated into the urban mobility offer, with significantly higher vehicle density and vehicle/inhabitants ratio than in the other French cities. This innovative approach resulted in a remarkably high ratio of nearly 42 members/1000 inhabitants in December 2016. In 2015, the service totalled >2300 clients, 33,000 rentals and 1.5 million kilometres after only 2 years running. These figures confirm the hypothesis that CS can be rapidly developed as a veritable alternative even in mid-sized towns. This article focuses on the design elements of the Belfort CS service as well as first analyses based on 2015 data and problems encountered.

Inspec keywords: air pollution control; automobiles

Other keywords: vehicle density; design elements; CS service; inhabitants ratio; public service approach; vehicle ratio; private cars; administration board; France; Belfort bus operator; car-sharing; mobility customs; greenhouse gas emission reduction; mid-sized towns; urban mobility offer

Subjects: Systems theory applications in transportation

References

    1. 1)
      • 16. Musso, A., Corazza, M.V., Tozzi, M.: ‘Car sharing in Rome: a case study to support sustainable mobility’, Proc. Social Behav Sci, 2012, 48, pp. 34823491.
    2. 2)
      • 43. Haefeli, U., Matti, D., Schreyer, C., et al: ‘Evaluation Car-Sharing: Schlussbericht’ (2006).
    3. 3)
      • 24. Surender, S.: ‘Strategic Insight of the global carsharing market: Frost & Sullivan Report #ND90-18’, June 2014.
    4. 4)
      • 41. van Nes, R., Bovy, P.: ‘Importance of objectives in urban transit-network design’, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, 2000, 1735, pp. 2534.
    5. 5)
      • 30. Röhr, T., Rovigo, M.: ‘Car-sharing in medium sized cities: the innovative example of Belfort (France)’. 11th ITS Europe Congress, Glasgow, 6–9 June 2016.
    6. 6)
      • 2. Wilke, G., Böhler, S., Bongardt, D., et al: ‘Zukunft des car-sharing in deutschland: schlussbericht’ (Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie GmbH, 2007).
    7. 7)
      • 9. Shaheen, S.A.: ‘Dynamics in behavioral adaptation to a transportation innovation: a case study of carlink – a smart carsharing system’. Proc. of Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, 1999, (qt9w53q5xq).
    8. 8)
      • 31. European Commission: ‘A concept for sustainable urban mobility plans: COM(2013) 913 final’, 2013.
    9. 9)
      • 38. ‘La notion de service public’, http://www.vie-publique.fr/decouverte-institutions/institutions/approfondissements/notion-service-public.html, accessed August, 2016.
    10. 10)
      • 19. Kopp, J., Gerike, R., Axhausen, K.W.: ‘Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members’, Transportation, 2015, 42, (3), pp. 449469.
    11. 11)
      • 26. 6t-bureau de recherche: ‘Enquête Nationale sur l'Autopartage - Edition 2016 - Etat des lieux technique et méthodologique. (National car-sharing survey - edition 2016 - technical and methodological state of the art)’, http://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/enquete-autopartage-en-trace-directe-201405.pdf, accessed August 2016.
    12. 12)
      • 1. Baum, H., Pesch, S.: ‘Untersuchungen der Eignung von Car-Sharing im Hinblick auf Reduzierung von Stadtverkehrsproblemen: Schlußbericht’ (Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen (FGSV), Köln, 1994).
    13. 13)
      • 23. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: ‘Innovative mobility industry Outlook_World 2016 final: carsharing market overview, analysis, and trends - Winter 2016’, http://tsrc.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/Innovative Mobility Industry Outlook_World 2016 Final.pdf, accessed January 2017.
    14. 14)
      • 8. Glotz-Richter, M.: ‘Reclaim street space! - exploit the European potential of car sharing’, Transp. Res. Proc., 2016, 14, pp. 12961304.
    15. 15)
      • 10. Commission of the European Communities: ‘Action plan on urban mobility: COM(2009) 490 final’, 2009.
    16. 16)
      • 27. Autolib' Metropole: ‘Tableau de bord S31’ (Paris, 08/2016).
    17. 17)
      • 28. ‘Chiffres clés sur un territoire (Key figures of a territory): statistical analysis using the values of the respective municipalities’, http://www.insee.fr/fr/bases-de-donnees/default.asp?page=statistiques-locales.htm, accessed January, 2016.
    18. 18)
      • 17. Floch, J.-M., Morel, B.: ‘Panorama des villes moyennes (Panorama of mid-sized towns): Working paper’, August 2011.
    19. 19)
      • 33. Holmberg, P.-E., Collado, M., Sarasini, S., et al: ‘Mobility as a Service - MaaS: describing the framework: final report MaaS framework’, 15 January 2016.
    20. 20)
      • 34. Pöllänen, J.: ‘MaaS: new business and service approaches’. 11th ITS Europe Congress, Glasgow, 6–9 June 2016.
    21. 21)
      • 39. Pangbourne, K., Beecroft, M.: ‘Personal security in travel by public transport: The role of traveller information and associated technologies’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2015, 9, (2), pp. 167174.
    22. 22)
      • 18. Barth, M., Shaheen, S.: ‘Shared-use vehicle systems: framework for classifying carsharing, station cars, and combined approaches’, Transp. Res. Rec J. Transp. Res. Board, 2002, 1791, pp. 105112.
    23. 23)
      • 3. 6T Bureau de recherche: ‘Enquête national sur l'autopartage (National survey on car-sharing)’, http://6t.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ENA_RF_130321.pdf, accessed August 2016.
    24. 24)
      • 7. Loose, W.: ‘The State of European Car-Sharing: Momo-Carsharing: Final Report D 2.4 Work Package 2’, June 2010.
    25. 25)
      • 35. Watson, Farley & Williams LLP: ‘Etude juridique relative à la mise en place d'un service d'autopartage (Legal study on the establishment of a car-sharing system)(Paris (not public), 2013).
    26. 26)
      • 25. Leveque, F.: ‘A strategic insight into carsharing market developments and dynamics’ (IAA Frankfort, 2011).
    27. 27)
      • 22. ‘Number of car-sharing users in Europe in 2014, by country’, http://www.statista.com/statistics/415263/car-sharing-users-in-europe-by-country/.
    28. 28)
      • 40. Baptista, P., Melo, S., Rolim, C.: ‘Energy, environmental and mobility impacts of car-sharing systems. Empirical results from Lisbon, Portugal’, Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 2014, 111, pp. 2837.
    29. 29)
      • 6. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: ‘Growth in worldwide carsharing: an international comparison’, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1992, pp. 8189.
    30. 30)
      • 37. Brook, D.: ‘Carsharing: Start-up issues and new operational models’. 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 11–15 January 2004.
    31. 31)
      • 14. Dowling, R., Kent, J.: ‘Practice and public–private partnerships in sustainable transport governance: the case of car sharing in Sydney, Australia’, Transp. Policy, 2015, 40, pp. 5864.
    32. 32)
      • 29. Syndicat Mixte des Transports en Commun du Territoire de Belfort: ‘Un contrat de mobilité pour le Territoire de Belfort (A mobility contract for the Belfort Territory)’, http://smtc90.fr/pdf/contrat_mobilite.pdf, accessed August 2016.
    33. 33)
      • 32. Hietanen, S.: ‘‘Mobility as a Service’ – the new transport model?’, in: ‘‘Mobility as a Service’ – the new transport model?’, 2014, 12, (2), pp. 24.
    34. 34)
      • 12. République Française: ‘Law 2010-788 regarding the national engagement for the environment, article 54, Paris: 2010-788’, 2010.
    35. 35)
      • 21. Le Vine, S., Zolfaghari, A., Polak, J.: ‘Carsharing: evolution, challenges and opportunities’ (Bruxelles, 2014), https://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/SAG_Report_-_Car_Sharing.pdf, accessed August 2016.
    36. 36)
      • 15. Morency, C., Trepanier, M., Agard, B., et al: ‘Car sharing system: what transaction datasets reveal on users’ behaviors’. 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conf., Bellevue, WA, USA, 30 September – 03 October 2007, pp. 284289.
    37. 37)
      • 11. European Commission: ‘White paper: roadmap to a single European transport area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system: COM(2011) 144 final’, 2011.
    38. 38)
      • 4. Rabbitt, N., Ghosh, B.: ‘A study of feasibility and potential benefits of organised car sharing in Ireland’, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 2013, 25, pp. 4958.
    39. 39)
      • 36. Cangialosi, E., Di Febbraro, A., Sacco, N.: ‘Designing a multimodal generalised ride sharing system’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 10, (4), pp. 227236.
    40. 40)
      • 13. Arena, M., Azzone, G., Colorni, A., et al: ‘Service design in electric vehicle sharing: Evidence from Italy’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2015, 9, (2), pp. 145155.
    41. 41)
      • 5. Meijkamp, R.: ‘Changing consumer behaviour through eco-efficient services: An empirical study of car sharing in the Netherlands’, Bus. Strat. Environ., 1998, 7, (4), pp. 234244.
    42. 42)
      • 42. Lohse, D.: ‘Grundlagen der Straenverkehrstechnik und der Verkehrsplanung: Band 2: Verkehrsplanung’ (Kirschbaum Verlag GmbH, Bonn, 2011, 3rd edn.).
    43. 43)
      • 20. Firnkorn, J., Müller, M.: ‘What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems?: The case of car2go in Ulm’, Ecol. Econ., 2011, 70, (8), pp. 15191528.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2016.0259
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2016.0259
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading