Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Examining pedestrian evasive actions as a potential indicator for traffic conflicts

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Received 01/03/2016, Accepted 23/01/2017, Revised 18/01/2017, Published 26/01/2017

The use of traffic conflicts is gaining acceptance as a proactive approach to studying road safety. A traffic conflict involves a chain of events in which at least one of the involved road-users performs some sort of evasive actions to avoid a potential collision. Pedestrian evasive actions are normally manifested by changes in the walking behaviour which is expressed through variations in their speed profile. This paper investigates the automatic detection of pedestrian evasive actions in a computer-vision framework. The study proposes a new measure for detecting pedestrians undertaking evasive actions based on permutation entropy (PE). PE is a robust approach for discovering dynamic characteristics of a time-series. In the current context, it reveals the degree of abnormality in the walking pattern by identifying the deviations from the normal free walking. The methodology is applied and validated using video data from an intersection in Shanghai, China. Results show that the PE-based indicator has a high potential to identify and measure the severity of conflicts that involve pedestrian evasive actions compared to traditional time-proximity measures (e.g. time-to-collision and post-encroachment-time). This research finds many applications in the modern transportation infrastructure monitoring, studying pedestrian crossing behaviour and developing safety programs for vulnerable road-users.

Inspec keywords: pedestrians; collision avoidance; traffic engineering computing; behavioural sciences computing; video signal processing; gait analysis; entropy; computer vision; road safety; time series

Other keywords: Shanghai; time-series; PE-based indicator; normal free walking behaviour; traffic conflicts; transportation infrastructure monitoring; speed profile; video data; automatic pedestrian evasive action detection; road safety; permutation entropy; traffic safety diagnosis; pedestrian crossing behaviour; nonconforming road user behaviour; China; safety programmes; proactive automated approach; walking behaviour; dynamic characteristics; computer-vision framework; collision avoidance

Subjects: Computer vision and image processing techniques; Social and behavioural sciences computing; Traffic engineering computing; Video signal processing; Other topics in statistics; Optical, image and video signal processing; Other topics in statistics

References

    1. 1)
      • 22. Hediyeh, H., Sayed, T., Zaki, M.H., et al: ‘Pedestrian gait analysis using automated computer vision techniques’, Transportmetrica A Transport Sci., 2014, 10, (3), pp. 214–232.
    2. 2)
      • 37. Saunier, N., Sayed, T.: ‘A feature-based tracking algorithm for vehicles in intersections’. IEEE, 2006.
    3. 3)
      • 48. Svensson, A.: ‘Further development and validation of the Swedish traffic conflicts technique’(Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund University, 1992).
    4. 4)
      • 7. Zheng, L., Ismail, K., Meng, X.: ‘Investigating the heterogeneity of postencroachment time thresholds determined by peak over threshold approach’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2016, 2601, pp. 17–23.
    5. 5)
      • 26. Laureshyn, A., De Ceunynck, T., Karlsson, C., et al: ‘In search of the severity dimension of traffic events: extended Delta-V as a traffic conflict indicator’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2017, 98, pp. 46–56.
    6. 6)
      • 1. Quintero, R., Almeida, J., Llorca, D., et al: ‘Pedestrian path prediction using body language traits’. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symp. Proc., 2014, pp. 317–323.
    7. 7)
      • 45. Keller, K., Sinn, M., Emonds, J.: ‘Time series from the ordinal viewpoint’, Stoch. Dyn., 2007, 7, (2), pp. 247–272.
    8. 8)
      • 10. Chin, H.-C., Quek, S.-T.: ‘Measurement of traffic conflicts’, Safety Sci., 1997, 26, (3), pp. 169–195.
    9. 9)
      • 49. Fleiss, J.L.: ‘Measuring nominal scale agreement among raters’, Psychol. Bull, 1971, 5, (76), pp. 378–382.
    10. 10)
      • 3. Sacchi, E., Sayed, T., deLeur, P.: ‘A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluations: the case of right-turn smart channels’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2013, 59, pp. 260–266.
    11. 11)
      • 46. Cao, Y., Tung, W.-W., Gao, J.B., et al: ‘Detecting dynamical changes in time series using the permutation entropy’, Phys. Rev. E, 2004, 70, p. 046217.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Tageldin, A., Sayed, T.: ‘Developing evasive action-based indicators for identifying pedestrian conflicts in less organised traffic environments’, J. Adv. Transport., 2016, 50, (6), pp. 1193–1208.
    13. 13)
      • 15. Archer, J.: ‘Methods for the assessment and prediction of traffic safety at urban intersections and their application in micro-simulation modelling’. PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, 2004.
    14. 14)
      • 28. Laureshyn, A., Svensson, Å., Hydén, C.: ‘Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2010, 42, pp. 1637–1646.
    15. 15)
      • 52. Ben, X., Huang, X., Zhuang, Z., et al: ‘Agent-based approach for crowded pedestrian evacuation simulation’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2013, 7, (1), pp. 56–67.
    16. 16)
      • 6. Svensson, Å., Hydén, C.: ‘Estimating the severity of safety related behaviour’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2006, 38, pp. 379–385.
    17. 17)
      • 29. Gang, R., Cheng, G., Lili, L., et al: ‘Modeling risk degree of conflicts between crossing pedestrians and vehicles at signalized intersections’, J. Transport. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 2012, 12, (5), pp. 76–81.
    18. 18)
      • 19. Malkhamah, S., Tight, M., Montgomery, F.: ‘The development of an automatic method of safety monitoring at pelican crossings’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2005, 37, pp. 938–946.
    19. 19)
      • 18. Hussein, M., Sayed, T.: ‘Microscopic pedestrian interaction behavior analysis using gait parameters’, Transport. Res Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2015, 2519, pp. 28–38.
    20. 20)
      • 8. Tontsch, A., Valero-Mora, P., Pareja, I.: ‘Identifying critical incidents in naturalistic driving data: experiences from a promoting real life observation for gaining understanding of road user behaviour in Europe small-scale field trial’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2013, 7, (2), pp. 198–202.
    21. 21)
      • 2. Sayed, T., Zein, S.: ‘Traffic conflict standards for intersections’, Transp. Plan. Technol., 1999, 22, (4), pp. 309–323.
    22. 22)
      • 17. Zaki, M.H., Sayed, T., Shaaban, K.: ‘Using drivers’ jerk profiles in computer vision based traffic safety evaluations’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2014, 2434, pp. 103–112.
    23. 23)
      • 51. Dozza, M., Idegren, M., Andersson, T., et al: ‘Platform enabling intelligent safety applications for vulnerable road users’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 8, (4), pp. 368–376.
    24. 24)
      • 4. Songchitruksa, P., Tarko, A.P.: ‘The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2006, 38, pp. 811–822.
    25. 25)
      • 23. Ismail, K., Sayed, T., Saunier, N., et al: ‘Automated analysis of pedestrian–vehicle conflicts using video data’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2009, 2140, pp. 44–54.
    26. 26)
      • 41. Ismail, K., Sayed, T., Saunier, N.: ‘A methodology for precise camera calibration for data collection applications in urban traffic scenes’, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 2013, 40, (1), pp. 57–67.
    27. 27)
      • 40. Tomasi, C., Kanade, T.: ‘Detection and tracking of point features’. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-132, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991.
    28. 28)
      • 31. Kaparias, I., Bell, M.G.H., Greensted, J., et al: ‘Development and implementation of a vehicle-pedestrian conflict analysis method’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2010, 2198, pp. 75–82.
    29. 29)
      • 14. Ismail, K., Sayed, T., Saunier, N.: ‘Methodologies for aggregating indicators of traffic conflict’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2011, 2237, pp. 10–19.
    30. 30)
      • 36. Bota, S., Nedesvchi, S.: ‘Multi-feature walking pedestrians detection for driving assistance systems’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2008, 2, (2), pp. 92–104.
    31. 31)
      • 35. Zaki, M., Sayed, T.: ‘Using automated walking gait analysis for the identification of pedestrian attributes’, Transport. Res. C Emerging Technol., 2014, 48, pp. 16–36.
    32. 32)
      • 34. Zegeer, C.V., Carter, D.L., Hunter, W.W., et al: ‘Index for assessing pedestrian safety at intersections’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2006, 1982, pp. 76–83.
    33. 33)
      • 33. Medina, J.C., Benekohal, R.F., Wang, M.-H.: ‘In-street pedestrian crossing signs and effects on pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at university campus crosswalks’. Washington, DC, 2008.
    34. 34)
      • 13. Archer, J.: ‘Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling: a study of urban and suburban intersections’ (Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005).
    35. 35)
      • 50. Zaki, M.H., Sayed, T.: ‘Exploring walking gait features for the automated recognition of distracted pedestrians’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2016, 10, (2), p. pp. 106–113.
    36. 36)
      • 20. Keller, C.G., Gavrila, D.M.: ‘Will the pedestrian cross? A study on pedestrian path prediction’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst., 2014, 15, 2, pp. 494–506.
    37. 37)
      • 12. Tageldin, A., Sayed, T., Wang, X.: ‘Can time proximity measures be used as safety indicators in all driving cultures? A case study of motorcycle safety in China’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2015, 2520, pp. 165–174.
    38. 38)
      • 47. FHWA: ‘Traffic conflict techniques for safety and operations: observer's manual’ (Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1989).
    39. 39)
      • 16. Bagdadi, O.: ‘Estimation of the severity of safety critical events’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2013, 50, pp. 167–174.
    40. 40)
      • 43. Saunier, N., Sayed, T., Ismail, K.: ‘Large scale automated analysis of vehicle interactions and collisions’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2010, 2147, pp. 42–50.
    41. 41)
      • 9. Amundsen, F., Hydén, C.: ‘Proceedings of first workshop on traffic conflicts’ (Lund Institute of Technology, Oslo, 1977).
    42. 42)
      • 44. Bandt, C., Pompe, B.: ‘Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 88, (17), p. 174102.
    43. 43)
      • 5. Hydén, C.: ‘The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: the Swedish traffic conflicts technique’. Lund, Sweden, 1987.
    44. 44)
      • 25. Zhang, Y., Yao, D., Qiu, T., et al: ‘Scene-based pedestrian safety performance model in mixed traffic situation’, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 2014, 8, (3), pp. 209–218.
    45. 45)
      • 42. Zaki, M.H., Sayed, T., Wang, X.: ‘Computer vision approach for the classification of bike type (motorized versus non-motorized) during busy traffic in the city of Shanghai’, J. Adv. Transport., 2016, 50, 3, pp. 348–362, in press.
    46. 46)
      • 39. Zaki, M.H., Sayed, T.: ‘Automated classification of road-user movement trajectories’, Transport. Res. C Emerging Technol., 2013, 33, pp. 50–73.
    47. 47)
      • 27. Ni, Y., Wang, M., Sun, J., et al: ‘Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framework based on pedestrian-vehicle interaction patterns’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2016, 96, pp. 118–129.
    48. 48)
      • 32. Salamati, K., Schroeder, B., Rouphail, N.M., et al: ‘Development and implementation of conflict-based assessment of pedestrian safety to evaluate accessibility of complex intersections’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2011, 2264, pp. 148–155.
    49. 49)
      • 21. Li, S., Sayed, T., Zaki, M.H., et al: ‘Automated collection of pedestrian data through computer vision techniques’, Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board, 2012, 2299, (1), pp. 121–127.
    50. 50)
      • 24. Alhajyaseen, W.K., Asano, M., Nakamura, H.: ‘Estimation of left-turning vehicle maneuvers for the assessment of pedestrian safety at intersections’, IATSS Res., 2012, 36, pp. 66–74.
    51. 51)
      • 30. Almodfer, R., Xiong, S., Fang, Z., et al: ‘Quantitative analysis of lane-based pedestrian-vehicle conflict at a non-signalized marked crosswalk’, Transport. Res. F, 2016, 42, pp. 468–478.
    52. 52)
      • 38. Autey, J., Sayed, T., Zaki, M.H.: ‘Safety evaluation of right-turn smart channels using automated traffic conflict analysis’, Accident Anal. Prevent., 2012, 45, pp. 120–130.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2016.0066
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2016.0066
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
Print this page
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address