access icon free Green safety index representing traffic levels of service for online application

The traditional roadway level of service (LOS) is based on the volume–capacity (V/C) ratio, which measures the volume of traffic. However, this approach does not follow the green transport trend, and it lacks the comprehensive concepts of time cost, environmental protection, and potential social cost of traffic safety. Given the international focus on the development of green economies and transport, this study examined freeways in Taiwan to establish three indicators: cost of travel delay, cost of incremental carbon emissions, and cost of potential accidents. Traffic data from the electronic toll collection system in Taiwan were collected and analysed according to three factors derived from different traffic volumes and travel speeds: time cost, pollution, and traffic safety. The results were integrated into a traffic green safety index to replace the overall evaluation standard for traditional freeway LOS. This index is intended for use in an online software application.

Inspec keywords: air pollution; road accidents; road traffic; road safety; traffic engineering computing; Internet

Other keywords: electronic toll collection system; traffic levels of service; time cost; freeway LOS; online software application; incremental carbon emissions cost; traffic green safety index; pollution; travel delay cost; accidents cost; evaluation standard; traffic safety; Taiwan

Subjects: Traffic engineering computing

References

    1. 1)
      • 28. TUV Rheinland Taiwan Ltd: ‘Electronic toll collection in distance-based Stage MLFF system Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Test Report’ (Publisher, 2013).
    2. 2)
      • 24. ‘MathWorks Web Site. Hierarchical multinomial-model’. http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/hierarchical-multinomial-models.html, accessed 12 December 2014.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
      • 30. Environmental Protection Administration, E.Y., R.O.C. (Taiwan): ‘Taiwan's air pollution emissions [TEDS8] emission line source – Collocation manual’ (Publisher, 2014).
    7. 7)
      • 26. Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications: ‘Inventory of Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Transportation Sector (3/3) – Developing Energy Efficiency Indicator and Modeling Energy Consumption for Transportation Sector’ (Publisher, 2011).
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 33. Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications: ‘Series of the fifth Taiwan area comprehensive transport planning research – a study on reviewing the intercity transportation system demand model as well as updating parameters’. 2014.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 1. Environmental Protection Administration, E.Y., R.O.C. (Taiwan): ‘Taiwan climate adaptation knowledge platform’. http://web.epa.gov.tw/en/index.aspx, accessed 30 December 2014.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
      • 27. National Taiwan University. Neural Network Laboratory’. http://red.csie.ntu.edu.tw/, accessed 12 December 2014.
    18. 18)
      • 14. Chang, T.-H., Chueh, C.-H.: ‘Development of time-dependent backward route planning system’, J. Chin. Inst. Transp., 2013, 25, (2), pp. 169198.
    19. 19)
      • 5. Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications: ‘2011 Highway capacity manual in Taiwan’ (Publisher, 2012).
    20. 20)
      • 2. Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications: ‘Planning for the cost-benefit evaluation tools and database of ITS energy saving and carbon reduction’ (Publisher, 2012).
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 29. Chang, S.-K., Guo, Y.-J.: ‘Development of urban full trip cost models’, Transp. Planning J., 2007, 36, (2), pp. 147182.
    23. 23)
      • 25. May, A.D.: ‘Traffic flow fundamentals’ (Prentice-Hall Inc Press, New Jersey, 1990).
    24. 24)
      • 3. Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs: ‘Of carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion statistics in Taiwan’ (Publisher, 2014).
    25. 25)
      • 6. SafetyNet: ‘State of the art report on road safety performance indicators, D3.1’ (Publisher, 2005).
    26. 26)
      • 32. Taiwan Area National Freeway Bureau, Ministry of Transportation and Communications’. http://www.freeway.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?cnid=239, accessed 12 December 2014.
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 13. Wang, X., Chen, X.: ‘Travel time estimation of a single segment based on freeway toll data, in CICTP 2014’ (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014), pp. 21612174.
    30. 30)
      • 4. Transportation Research Board: ‘Highway capacity manual 2010’ (Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., Press, 2010).
    31. 31)
      • 11. Zongwei, T., Spotts, J., Lu, B., et al: ‘Forecasting and delivery of highway travel time reliability information’ (Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2012).
    32. 32)
      • 7. European Conference of Ministers of Transport (ECMT), Economic Research Centre Report of the Hundred and Seventeen Round Table on Transport Economics, in Economic Evaluation of Road Traffic Safety Measures, Paris on 26th–27th, 2000.
    33. 33)
      • 31. Taiwan Emission Trading Association: ‘Taiwan's carbon emissions trading’. http://www.teta.org.tw/, accessed 12 December 2014.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0086
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2015.0086
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading