access icon free Improving the road network performance with dynamic route guidance by considering the indifference band of road users

When applying dynamic route guidance to improve the road network performance, the interests of the road authorities and the road users are likely to conflict. Road users are normally aiming at minimising their travel times by choosing the time-shortest route, whereas the authorities might want to send road users to a time-longer alternative to prevent phenomena like capacity drop and spill-back. In this study, the authors demonstrate how, in such a situation, bounded rationality and indifference bands (IB) of road users can be used to improve the network performance, such that the road users will not experience being disadvantaged by the advice. An interpretation and utilisation of the IBs in a route guidance control approach is proposed, which degrades the routes such that the network performance deterioration is prevented while the IBs of road users are respected. By means of a simulation test case, the potential gain in network performance of different IBs is evaluated. Results show a reduction in total travel time of 5% compared with user equilibrium, in case of an IB of 4 min for a trip of ∼22 min, and up to 14% in case of an IB of 10 min.

Inspec keywords: road traffic; vehicle routing

Other keywords: travel times; network performance deterioration; bounded rationality; time-longer alternative; indifference band; IB; road authorities; road network performance; time-shortest route; route guidance control approach; spill-back; indifference bands; capacity drop; dynamic route guidance; road users

Subjects: Combinatorial mathematics; Systems theory applications in transportation; Optimisation techniques

References

    1. 1)
      • 44. Landman, R.L., Hegyi, A., Hoogendoorn, S.P.: ‘Service level-oriented route guidance in road traffic networks’. Proc. of the 14th Int. IEEE – ITS Conf., Washington, DC, 2011.
    2. 2)
      • 36. Zhu, S., Levinson, D.: ‘Do people use the shortest path? An empirical test of Wardrop's first principle’. Proc. of the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2012.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 38. Tawfik, A., Rakha, H., Miller, S.: ‘Examining drivers experiences, perceptions, and choices in route choice behavior’. Proc. of the 13th IEEE – ITS Conf. – Workshop on Traffic Behavior, Modeling and Optimization, Madeira Island, 2010.
    6. 6)
      • 15. Chang, G.-L., Mahmassani, H.S.: ‘The dynamics of commuting decision behavior in urban transportation networks’, in Gerardin, B., (Ed.): ‘Travel behaviour research’ (Gower Publishing, Aldershot, England, 1989), pp. 1526.
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 1. Wardrop, J.G.: ‘Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research’, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 1952, 1, pp. 325378.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 14. Simon, H.A.: ‘Models of bounded rationality: behavioral economics and business organization’ (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982).
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 2. Van Vugt, M.: ‘Social dilemmas and transportation decisions’ (Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 1996).
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • 26. Washburn, S.S., Ramlackhan, K., McLeod, D.S.: ‘Quality-of-service perceptions by rural freeway travelers: exploratory analysis’, Transp. Res. Rec., 2004, 1998, pp. 3137.
    22. 22)
      • 23. Tversky, A., Kahnemann, D.: ‘Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty’, J. Risk Uncertain., 1992, 9, pp. 195230.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
      • 7. Mahmassani, H.S.: ‘Dynamics of commuter behavior: recent research and continuing challanges’, in Lee-Gosselin, M., Stopher, P. (Eds.): ‘Understanding travel behavior in an era of change’ (Pergamon Press, New York, 1996).
    25. 25)
      • 24. Mahmassani, H.S., Chang, G.-L.: ‘Dynamic aspects of departure-time choice behavior in a commuting system: theoretical framework and experimental analysis’, Transp. Res. Rec., 1985, 1037, pp. 88101.
    26. 26)
      • 25. Van Knippenberg, C., Van Knippenberg, A.: ‘Measurement of arrival times; a discussion of Mahmassani et al., 1985’, Transp. Res. Rec., 1986, 1085, pp. 4749.
    27. 27)
      • 42. Bie, J., Vreeswijk, J., Van Berkum, E.: ‘Adopting prospect theory for modeling day-to-day traffic dynamics: risk aversion and equilibrium stability’. Fourth Int. Symp. on Dynamic Traffic Assignment, Martha's Vineyard, MA, 2012.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 31. Pecheux, K.K., Pietrucha, M.T., Jovanis, P.P.: ‘User perception of level of service at signalized intersections’. Proc. of the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000a.
    30. 30)
      • 13. Avineri, E.: ‘Choice architecture’ and the design of advanced traveler information systems (ATIS)’. Proc. of the 13th IEEE – ITS Conf. – Workshop on Traffic Behavior, Modeling and Optimization, Madeira, 2010.
    31. 31)
      • 5. Ariely, D.: ‘Predictably irrational – revised and expanded edition’ (HarperCollings Publishers, London, 2009).
    32. 32)
      • 11. Chorus, C.G., Timmermans, H.J.P.: ‘Measuring user benefits of changes in the transport system when traveler awareness is limited’, Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract., 2009, 43, (5), pp. 536547.
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • 28. Choocharukul, K., Sinha, K.C., Mannering, F.L.: ‘User perceptions and engineering definitions of highway level of service: an exploratory statistical comparison’, Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract., 2004, 38, (9–10), pp. 677689.
    35. 35)
      • 30. Zhang, L.: ‘Signalized intersection level-of-service that accounts for user perceptions’ (University of Hawaii, Manoa, 2004).
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
      • 37. Thomas, T., Tutert, S.I.A.: ‘Route choice behavior based on license plate observations in the Dutch city of Enschede’. Proc. of the Seventh Triennial Symp. on Transportation Analysis: Tristan VII, 2010.
    40. 40)
    41. 41)
      • 22. Van Hagen, M.: ‘Waiting experience at train stations’ (University of Twente, Enschede, 2011).
    42. 42)
      • 50. Hegyi, A.: ‘Model predictive control for integrating traffic control measures’ (Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, 2004).
    43. 43)
    44. 44)
    45. 45)
    46. 46)
    47. 47)
    48. 48)
    49. 49)
    50. 50)
    51. 51)
      • 21. Jou, R.-C., Lam, S.-H., Liu, Y.-H., Chen, K.-H.: ‘Route switching behavior on freeways with the provision of different types of real-time traffic information’, Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract., 2005, 39, (5), pp. 445461.
    52. 52)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0258
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0258
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading