access icon free Powered two wheelers’ workload assessment with various methods using a motorcycle simulator

A riding simulator study (n = 14) was conducted in order to test the sensitivity of performance measures, subjective ratings as well as physiological measures in controlled variations of rider workload. In a second study (n = 15), these parameters were used in order to assess the effects of different secondary tasks. The task of operating an on-bike information system led to the highest workload, for example, indicated by deteriorated lane keeping and higher subjective ratings compared with a simple visual, an auditory and no secondary task at all. The third study (n = 18) focused on the effects of eyes-off road while riding using the method of occlusion. This revealed that the participants felt safe to black out the scenery quite often and long. Periods of occlusion were related to a higher mean velocity and a tendency to ride more on the left side of the lane compared with riding with enabled projection.

Inspec keywords: motorcycles; traffic engineering computing

Other keywords: rider workload; riding simulator study; motorcycle simulator; workload assessment; onbike information system; deteriorated lane keeping; occlusion periods; various methods

Subjects: Traffic engineering computing

References

    1. 1)
      • 28. Krammes, R.A., Brackett, R.Q., Shafer, M.A., et al: ‘Horizontal alignment design consistency for rural two-lane highways’, Transp. Res. Rec., 1995, pp. 110.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 15. Hacker, W.: ‘Arbeitspsychologie’ (Hans Huber, Bern, Swiss, 1986).
    4. 4)
      • 20. Reid, G.B., Shingledecker, C.A., Eggemeier, F.T.: ‘Application of conjoint measurement to workload scale development’. Proc. of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting(Sage Publications, 1981, 5, (1)), pp. 522526.
    5. 5)
      • 46. Hockey, G.: ‘Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical framework’, Biol. Psychol., 1997, 45, (1), pp. 7393.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 24. Kantowitz, B.H.: ‘Simulator evaluation of heavy-vehicle driver workload’. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, (Sage Publications, 1995, 39, (17)), pp. 11071111.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 22. Farmer, E., Brownson, A.: ‘Review of workload measurement, analysis an interpretation methods’ (European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation, Brussels, Belgium, 2003).
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 34. Seydel, U.: ‘Fahrverhalten und belastung im großstadtverkehr’. PhD thesis, Universität Wien, 1973.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • 19. De Waard, D.: ‘The measurement of drivers’ mental workload’. PhD thesis, Proefschrift, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 1996. Available at http://www.dissertations.ub.rug.nl/FILES/faculties/ppsw/1996/d.de.waard/09_thesis.pdf.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 50. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J.: ‘The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/ crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data’. No. HS-810 594, 2006.
    19. 19)
      • 3. WHO: ‘World report on road traffic injury prevention’ (World Health Organization, 2004).
    20. 20)
      • 44. Spiegel, B.: ‘Die Obere Hälfte Des Motorads’ (Motorbuch Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 1999, 7th edn. 2012).
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 7. Ferrazzin, D., Salsedo, F., Barbagli, F., et al: ‘The Moris motorcycle simulator: an overview’, SAE Trans., 2001, 111, (3), pp. 199210.
    23. 23)
      • 36. O'Donnell, C.R.D., Eggemeier, F.T.: ‘Workload assessment methodology’, in Boff, K.R., Kaufmann, L., Thomas, J.P. (Eds.): ‘Handbook of perception and human performance’ (John Wiley and Sons, 1986).
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 26. Metz, B., Schoemig, N., Krueger, H.-P.: ‘How is driving-related attention in driving with visual secondary tasks controlled? Evidence for top-down attentional control’, in Regan, M.A., Lee, J.D., Victor, T.W. (Eds.): ‘Driver distraction and inattention’ (Ashgate, Farnham, United Kingdom, 2013), pp. 83102.
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
      • 37. Buld, S., Will, S., Kaussner, A., Krüger, H.-P.: ‘Entwicklung eines verfahrens zur erfassung der fahrerbeanspruchung beim motorradfahren’ (Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen – Fahrzeugtechnik F 93, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany, 2014).
    29. 29)
      • 43. Pauzié, A., Gelau, C.: ‘Saferider project – evaluation methodology & tools’ (Saferider FP7-216355, Lyon, France, 2009).
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 8. Stedmon, A.W., Brickell, E., Hancox, M., Noble, J., Rice, D.: ‘Motorcyclesim: a user-centred approach in developing a simulator for motorcycle ergonomics and rider human factors research’, Adv. Transp. Stud., 2012, 27, pp. 3148.
    32. 32)
      • 33. Hering, K.: ‘Situationsabhängiges Verfahren zur standardisierten messung der kognitiven Beanspruchung im Straßenverkehr’. PhD thesis, Universität Köln, 1999.
    33. 33)
      • 35. Verwey, W.B., Veltman, J.A.: ‘Measuring workload peaks while driving. A comparison of nine different common workload assessment techniques’, 1995.
    34. 34)
      • 38. Fajans, J.: ‘Steering in bicycles and motorcycles’, Am. Assoc. Phys. Teach., 2000, 68, (7), pp. 654659.
    35. 35)
      • 1. DEKRA: ‘Motorcycle road safety report 2010. Strategies for preventing accidents on the roads of Europe’ (DEKRA Automobil GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, 2010), pp. 518.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
      • 17. Wierwille, W.W., Williges, R.C.: ‘Survey and analysis of operator workload assessment techniques’ (Systemetrics Inc., Cranston, USA, 1978).
    40. 40)
      • 13. Ba, Y., Zhang, W.: ‘A review of driver mental workload in driver-vehicle-environment system’, in Rau, P.L.P. (Ed.): ‘Internationalization, design and global development, HCII 2011’ (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011), pp. 125134.
    41. 41)
      • 18. Pfendler, C., Pitrella, F.D., Wiegand, D.: ‘Messung der Beanspruchung bei der Systembewertung’ (Forschungsinst. für Anthropotechnik, Wachtberg-Werthhoven, Germany, 1995).
    42. 42)
      • 5. Kuschefski, A., Haasper, M., Vallese, A.: ‘Advanced rider assistance systems for powered two-wheelers (ARAS-PTW) – fahrer-assistenzsysteme an motorisierten zweirädern (FAS-M)’. Eighth Int. Motorrad-Konf. ‘Sicherheit-Umwelt-Zukunft’ des Inst. für Zweiradsicherheit e.V., Cologne, Germany, October 2010.
    43. 43)
      • 4. Industrie-Verband Motorrad Deutschland. Available at http://www.ivm-ev.de/ivm_performance_2013_12_markt_in_zahlen.html?action=viewStatistic&StatisticId=6, accessed July 2014.
    44. 44)
    45. 45)
    46. 46)
    47. 47)
    48. 48)
    49. 49)
      • 42. De Waard, D., Brookhuis, K.: ‘On the measurement of driver mental workload’, in Rothengatter, T., Vaya, E.C. (Eds.): ‘Traffic and transport psychology’ (Pergamon, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1997).
    50. 50)
      • 51. Diederichs, F., Hegele, M., Ganzhorn, M.: ‘Development and evaluation of a haptic navigation system for motorbike riders’. Ninth Int. Motorrad-Konferenz des Inst. für Zweiradsicherheit e.V., Cologne, Germany, October 2012.
    51. 51)
      • 2. Yannis, G., Evgenikos, P., Papantoniou, P., et al: ‘Basic fact sheet ‘motorcycles and mopeds’’ (DaCoTA, Athens, Greece, 2012), pp. 16.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0231
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0231
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading