Business ecosystems aim to develop the capabilities of its participants through collaboration supporting new offerings, better fulfil customer requirements and eventually create new innovations. Acting in an ecosystem provides synergistic benefits to actors by increasing the total value of the output – the actors can achieve more than they would have achieved working independently. The main objective of both studied winter maintenance ecosystems, Finnish and Japanese, is to enhance safety and ensure good road conditions. These ecosystems are compared to analyse and discuss the potential ways to develop current value networks. As roads and streets are publicly owned in most cases and mobility services regarded as a public good, the role of the public sector mostly dictates the topology and ecosystem actors. In Finland, the role of the road authorities is reduced because of the restructuring of the public sector, whereas in Japan it has so far remained stronger although road authorities have enhanced cooperation with local residents. For authorities in both countries, the prevailing lack of resources for maintenance operations is a strong motivating factor for finding new, more efficient procurement and operating models. Understanding the roles of all actors involved in the winter maintenance ecosystem is essential in this search for efficiency.

References

1. 1)
  - 7. Freeman, E.R.: ‘Strategic management: a stakeholder approach’ (Pitman Publishing Inc., 1984).
2. 2)
  - 10. Donaldson, K.M., Ishii, K., Sheppard, S.D.: ‘Customer value chain analysis’, Res. Eng. Des., 2006, 16, pp. 174–183 (doi: 10.1007/s00163-006-0012-8).
3. 3)
  - 9. Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., Frohlich, M.: ‘Case research in operations management’, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 2002, 22, (2), pp. 195–219 (doi: 10.1108/01443570210414329).
4. 4)
  - 5. Peltoniemi, M.: ‘Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems’, Emergence: Complex. Organ., 2006, 8, (1), pp. 10–19.
5. 5)
  - 12. FOLDOC – Free on-line dictionary of computing: ‘Information and communication technology’, 2008, http://www.foldoc.org/Information+and+Communication+Technology, accessed November 2014.
6. 6)
  - 17. Roine, M.: ‘Strategic views on ITS innovation’. Nineth ITS European Congress, Dublin, Ireland, June 2013.
7. 7)
  - 4. Adetola, A., Goulding, J., Liyanage, C.: ‘Public–private perception of collaborative infrastructure projects in Nigeria’, Int. J. Procurement Manag., 2013, 6, (2), pp. 235–254 (doi: 10.1504/IJPM.2013.052471).
8. 8)
  - 14. Leviäkangas, P., Aapaoja, A., Kinnunen, T., Pilli-Sihvola, E., Hautala, R., Zulkarnain, : ‘The Finnish road weather ecosystem – turning societal benefits into business and the other way round’, Eng. Manag. Res., 2014, 3, (1) (doi: 10.5539/emr.v3n1p56).
9. 9)
  - 16. Mizutani, F., Uranishi, S.: ‘Privatization of the Japan highway public corporation: policy assessment’. 46th Congress for the European Regional Science Association, Volos, Greece, 2006.
10. 10)
  - 8. Mathison, S.: ‘Encyclopedia of evaluation’ (Sage Publications, 2005).
11. 11)
  - 15. Finnish National Road Administration: ‘Tiesääjärjestelmän rakentaminen 1987–1992’ (Kymi road district, Finnish National Road Administration, 1993).
12. 12)
  - 6. Moore, J.F.: ‘Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition’. Harvard Business Review, May–June 1993, http://www.blogs.law.harvard.edu/jim/files/2010/04/Predators-and-Prey.pdf, accessed July 2014.
13. 13)
  - 13. Kostiainen, J., Zulkarnain, , Leviäkangas, P., Hautala, R.: ‘Business model evolution for ITS services’. 20th ITS World Congress, Tokyo, Japan, October 2013.
14. 14)
  - 2. Molarius, R., Könönen, V., Leviäkangas, P., Zulkarnain, , Rönty, J.: ‘The extreme weather risk indicators (EWRI) for European transport system’, Nat. Hazards, 2013, 72, (1), pp. 189–210 (doi: 10.1007/s11069-013-0650-x).
15. 15)
  - 3. Leviäkangas, P.: ‘Building value in ITS services by analysing information service supply chains and value attributes’, Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res., 2011, 9, (2), pp. 47–54.
16. 16)
  - 11. Rubenstein-Montano, B., Liebowitz, J., Buchwalter, J., McCaw, D., Newman, B., Rebeck, K.: ‘A systems thinking framework for knowledge management’, Decis. Support Syst., 2001, 31, (1), pp. 5–16 (doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00116-0).
17. 17)
  - 1. Leviäkangas, P., Molarius, R., Könönen, V., Hietajärvi, A.M., Zulkarnain, : ‘Devising and demonstrating an extreme weather risk indicator for transportation system’, Transp. Res. Record J. Transp. Res. Board, 2013, 2329, pp. 45–53 (doi: 10.3141/2329-06).

Evolving winter road maintenance ecosystems in Finland and Hokkaido, Japan

References

Related content