Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Acceptability of driving an equipped vehicle with drive recorder: the impact of the context

The objective of this study conducted in the S_VRAI project [saving lives by road incident analysis feedback] is to present results about the acceptability of equipping a vehicle with an event data recorder (EDR) without feedback. Five focus groups were conducted in two different French Civil Service departments. Lack of privacy, volunteering, anonymity and the data access are main elements of the acceptability of the EDR. The results show also the importance of the societal and professional context when studying the acceptability of an EDR. However, all these elements need to be moderated by the corporate culture.

References

    1. 1)
      • 20. Beanland, V., Lenné, M.G.: ‘An international study of the factors associated with the acceptability of advanced rider assistive systems for powered two-wheelers’. Proc. of the 2013 Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing & Education Conf., Brisbane, Queensland, 28th August 2013.
    2. 2)
      • 1. Guilbot, M.: Rapport sur les aspects juridiques. Le projet S_VRAI et la protection des données à caractère personnel. Dossier de présentation pour la demande d'autorisation à la CNIL concernant la phase 1 du projet. Convention de Subvention DSCR/Certu/INRETS n°7624 (2011).
    3. 3)
      • 18. Ralf, E., Krishnakumar, R., Langlois, A.: ‘Acceptabilité des nouvelles technologies dans l'automobile’. Proc. of the 17th Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conf., Québec, June 2007.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 11. Levick, N., Wiersch, L., Nagel, M.E.: ‘Real World Application of an Aftermarket Driver Human Factors Real-Time Auditory Monitoring and Feedback Device: An Emergency Service Perspective’. Paper Number 07–0254, 2004.
    6. 6)
      • 35. Templeton, J.A.: ‘The focus group, revised edition’ (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994).
    7. 7)
      • 15. Knipling, R.R., Hickman, J.S., Bergoffen, G.: ‘Commercial truck and bus safety synthesis program (U.S.)’ (Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, USA, 2003).
    8. 8)
      • 3. Mitsopoulos, E., Regan, M.A., Haworth, N.: ‘Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to Victorian car drivers’. Australian Road Safety Conf., Gold Coast, October, 2002.
    9. 9)
      • 22. Athavale, M., Borna, S.: ‘Some issues for insurers on the use of event data recorders’, J. Insurers Issue, 2008, 31, (1), pp. 115.
    10. 10)
      • 13. Lewick, N.R., Swanson, J.: ‘An optimal solution for enhancing ambulance safety implementing a driver performance feedback and monitoring device in ground emergency medical service vehicle’. Proc. 49th Annual Proc., Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine, September 2005.
    11. 11)
      • 2. Serre, T., Naude, C., Chauvet, S., Fournier, J.Y., Lechner, D., Ledoux, V.: ‘Towards a classification of road incidents acquired from public fleets of vehicles’. Second Int. Symp. on Future Active Safety Technology towards Zero-traffic Accident, Nagoya, Japan, September 2013.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 26. Rogers, E.: ‘Diffusion of innovation’ (Free Press, New York, 1995).
    14. 14)
      • 27. Kiesler, C.A.: ‘The psychology of commitment. Experiments liking behavior to belief’ (Academic Press, San-Diego, 1971).
    15. 15)
      • 4. Gabler, H.C., Gabauer, D.J., Newell, H.L., O'Neill, M.E.: ‘Use of event data recorder (EDR) technology for highway crash data analysis’. NCHRP, 2013.
    16. 16)
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 23. ROSPA: ‘Road safety and in-vehicle monitoring technology’. (http://www.rospa.com Birmingham, 2013).
    19. 19)
      • 34. Duchesne, S., Haegel, F.: ‘L'enquête et ses méthodes: l'entretien collectif’ (Nathan, coll. 128, Paris, 2008).
    20. 20)
      • 31. Doise, W.: ‘L'explication en psychologie sociale’ (Presses universitaires de France, 1982).
    21. 21)
      • 24. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: ‘User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view’, MIS Q., 2003, 27, (3), pp. 425478.
    22. 22)
      • 28. Joule, R.V., Beauvois, J.L.: ‘Petit traité de manipulation à l'usage des honnêtes gens’ (P.U.G, Grenoble, 2002).
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
      • 5. Bjørskau, T., Assum, T., Eriksson, L., Hrelja, R., Nyberg, J.: ‘Summary: privacy protection and ITS-based road safety measures’. TØI Report, 1097, 2010.
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 25. Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering’ (Academic Press, Boston, 1993).
    30. 30)
      • 36. CNIL, http://www.cnil.fr/english/, accessed July 2014.
    31. 31)
      • 12. Lehman, G., Cheale, A.: ‘The Contribution of Onboard Recording Systems to Road Safety and Accident Analysis’. Paper Number 98-S2–0–34, 2005.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
      • 21. Cairney, P.: ‘Consumers’ views of information technology based systems for passenger cars (RR ARR 277)’ (ARRB Transportation Research, 1995).
    35. 35)
      • 38. Diani, M.: ‘Économie Évolutionniste et culture d'entreprise’. PhD thesis, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, 2003.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
      • 33. Regan, M.A., Mitsopoulos, E., Haworth, N., Young, K.: ‘Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to Victorian car drivers’. Royal Automobile Club of Victoria Research Report RACV, 2002.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0174
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0174
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address