Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Position and orientation error analysis and its compensation for a wheeled train uncoupling robot with four degrees-of-freedom

A wheeled train uncoupling robot with four degrees-of-freedom has been developed to replace humans in the uncoupling task in a marshalling field for designating freight cars to different destinations. To successfully achieve the task in practical applications, the positioning accuracy of the robot is an important issue to be considered. Based on the kinematic model using Denavit–Hartenberg method, the matrix differential method is applied here to establish the static position and orientation error model. The impact of parameter errors upon the static pose error of the uncoupling manipulator is analysed. The flexibility of the robot's key components is taken into consideration to analyse its impact on the position and orientation error of the manipulator. The position and orientation error compensation is developed by using input motion planning method to improve the pose accuracy of the robot. Additional motions are added to each joint of the robot such that the uncoupling manipulator can generate a corresponding tiny perturbation, which is used to eliminate the positioning error, ensuring the uncoupling action is completed successfully.

References

    1. 1)
      • 7. Kumar, A., Prakash, S.: ‘Analysis of mechanical errors in manipulators’. Proc. Sixth World Congress Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, New Delhi, India, September 1983.
    2. 2)
      • 15. Fei, X.G.: ‘Comprehensive analysis of pose errors of serial robot’, Thesis, Northeastern University, 2009.
    3. 3)
      • 16. Jiao, G.T., Feng, Y.H., Wang, F., et al: ‘Synthetically analysis of the robot pose error resulting from various factors’, J. Basic Sci. Eng., 2004, 12, (4), pp. 435442.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 11. Craig, J.J.: ‘Introduction to Robotics’ (Addison-Wesky Publishing Company, 1989).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 3. Mavroidis, C., Dubowsky, S., Drouet, P., et al: ‘A systematic error analysis of robotic manipulators: application to a high performance medical robot’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, April 1997, pp. 980985.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
      • 19. Tsai, C.S., Chen, W.J., Yun, D., et al: ‘Iterative learning control for vibration reduction in industrial robots with link flexibility’. American Control Conf., Washington, DC, USA, 17–19 June 2013, pp. 51955200.
    13. 13)
      • 14. Wen, R.: ‘Research on error sources analysis and dynamic simulation of 6-DOF measurement robot’, Thesis, Xi'an University of Technology, 2008.
    14. 14)
      • 20. Jiao, G.T., Li, Q., Feng, Y.H., et al: ‘A compensation method of the robot pose error’, J. N. Chi. Inst. Technol., 2003, 24, (2), pp. 104107.
    15. 15)
      • 17. Hwang, S.T., Eltimsahy, A.: ‘Effect of link flexibility of an adaptive tracking controller for a robot manipulator’. Int. Conf. on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, Kobe, Japan, 28 October–1 November 1991, pp. 12891294.
    16. 16)
      • 21. Jiao, G.T., Yu, Y.Q., Liang, H.: ‘The application of matrix structural method to the error analysis of robots’, J. Basic Sci. Eng., 2001, 9, (2–3), pp. 259265.
    17. 17)
      • 1. Siciliano, B., Khatib, O.: ‘Handbook of Robotics’ (Berlin, Springer, 2008), pp. 963986.
    18. 18)
      • 12. Zhu, J.: ‘Robotic control technology’ (Zhejiang University Press, 1991).
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 18. Chiou, B.C., Shahinpoor, M.: ‘The effects of joint and link flexibilities on the dynamic stability of force-controlled manipulators’. IEEE. Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, May 1989, pp. 398403.
    21. 21)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0027
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2014.0027
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address