© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems as an effective alternative transport mode which will benefit urban transportation knowledge for creating a BRT system. BRT can be seen as a feasible solution to traffic congestion and is designed using delicate transportation design strategies, such as, dedicated lanes, adequate station design, master planning of service and operation, faster toll collection, up-to-date intelligent transportation systems applications. BTR systems will improve time, safety and cost-effectiveness by accomplishing the goals of increasing speed and ridership. Unlike rail, BRT is a flexible transit design system. BRT acceptance is determined with algorithms such as logistic modelling and ridership data. Optimum potential determination of a system is possible by looking at international and local studies examining BRT problems and strengths. Problems consist of conflicts with other transportation modes and population booms. Determining if a system will be used also heavily falls on the quality. Most transit systems are perceived eyesores and inefficient modes with over-congestion, these barriers can be overcome with proper design that gives a captivating addition to the community.
References
-
-
1)
-
2. Leal, M., Bertini, R.: .
-
2)
-
20. Kittelson & Associates, Inc.: Transit capacity and quality of service manual. , January1999, pp. 2–25.
-
3)
-
4)
-
30. Kim, E.J., Darido, G., Schneck, D.: ‘Las Vegas Metropolitan Area Express (MAX) BRT demonstration project evaluation’. . United States Department of Transportation, August2005.
-
5)
-
6)
-
22. Monismith, C.L., Weissman, S.L., Popescu, L., Santero, N.J.: ‘Establishing infrastructure requirements for bus rapid transportation operations in dedicated bus lanes’. , California PATH Program Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley, CA, November2008, p. 7.
-
7)
-
8)
-
19. Weinstock, A., Hook, W., Replogle, M., Cruz, R.: ‘Recapturing global leadership in bus rapid transit’. , Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2013, pp. 7–17.
-
9)
-
10)
-
11)
-
10. Ping, G.O., Kumares, C.S., Fang, T.F.: ‘Strategies for achieving sustainability through integrated transportation and urban development in the USA and Asia’, Asian Transp. Stud., 2010, 1, (1), 89–104, .
-
12)
-
13)
-
14)
-
3. Harrington, K., Leuw, D.: .
-
15)
-
16)
-
1. Lomax, T., Schrank, D., Eisele, B.: .
-
17)
-
18)
-
19)
-
20)
-
31. Yagi, S., Mohammadian, A.: ‘Policy simulation for new BRT and area pricing alternatives using an opinion survey in Jakarta’, Transp. Plan. Technol., 2008, 31, (5), pp. 589–612 (doi: 10.1080/03081060802087676).
-
21)
-
28. Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S., Clinger, J., Gast, J., Rutherford, S., Bruhn, E.: ‘Bus rapid transit Volume 2: implementation guidelines’. , Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, p. S-2.
-
22)
-
23)
-
21. Kittelson & Associates: ‘Cost and effectiveness of selected bus rapid transit components’. , Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2013.
-
24)
-
24. Kulyk, W.P.E., Hardy, M.: ‘ITS enhanced bus rapid transit systems’. , Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2013, pp. 1–43.
-
25)
-
26)
-
4. Shen, D., Elbadrawi, H., Zhao, F., Ospina, D.: .
-
27)
-
28)
-
29)
-
30)
-
31)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0176
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0176
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6