http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Effectiveness of forward obstacles collision warning system based on deceleration for collision avoidance

Effectiveness of forward obstacles collision warning system based on deceleration for collision avoidance

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In the authors previous study, the authors proposed deceleration for collision avoidance (DCA) as an index to evaluate collision risks against forward obstacles and examined the effectiveness of their forward obstacles collision warning system (FOCWS) based on DCA. In the present manuscript, they improve the visual interface of the FOCWS, and conduct driving simulator experiments to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the improved FOCWS in situations where a preceding vehicle decelerates abruptly. The experimental results revealed that the FOCWS based on DCA was effective in assisting drivers to shorten the reaction time and to avoid collisions. Moreover, in the subjective assessment questionnaire, a significant number of experimental participants reported that the FOCWS based on DCA could evaluate collision risks more properly compared with the FOCWS based on a time-to-collision.

References

    1. 1)
      • H. Takahashi .
        1. Takahashi, H.: ‘Summary of the eighth fundamental traffic safety program’, J. Soc. Autom. Eng. Jpn., 2006, 60, (12), pp. 49.
        . J. Soc. Autom. Eng. Jpn. , 12 , 4 - 9
    2. 2)
      • (2011)
        2. Balancing human activity with protecting the environment is what we seek’. 2011 CSR Report, Fuji Heavy Industries, 2011.
        .
    3. 3)
      • 3. ‘SAFETY ACTIVITIES - NISSAN'S APPROACH TO SAFETY –’ (Nissan Motor Company, August 2006).
        .
    4. 4)
      • E. Coelingh , A. Eidehall , M. Bengtsson .
        4. Coelingh, E., Eidehall, A., Bengtsson, M.: ‘Collision warning with full auto brake and pedestrian detection – a practical example of automatic emergency braking –’. Proc. 13th Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Madeira Island, Portugal, September 2010, pp. 155160.
        . Proc. 13th Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems , 155 - 160
    5. 5)
      • R. Bogenrieder , M. Fehring , R. Bachmann .
        5. Bogenrieder, R., Fehring, M., Bachmann, R.: ‘PRE-SAFE in rear-end collision situations’. Proc. 21th Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, June 2009, Paper No. 09-0129.
        . Proc. 21th Int. Technical Conf. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • T. Hiraoka , M. Tanaka , H. Kumamoto , T. Izumi , K. Hatanaka .
        11. Hiraoka, T., Tanaka, M., Kumamoto, H., Izumi, T., Hatanaka, K.: ‘Collision risk evaluation index based on deceleration for collision avoidance (first report) – proposal of a new index to evaluate collision risk against forward obstacles’, Rev. Autom. Eng., 2009, 30, (4), pp. 429437.
        . Rev. Autom. Eng. , 4 , 429 - 437
    12. 12)
      • T. Hiraoka , M. Tanaka , S. Takeuchi , H. Kumamoto , T. Izumi , K. Hatanaka .
        12. Hiraoka, T., Tanaka, M., Takeuchi, S., Kumamoto, H., Izumi, T., Hatanaka, K.: ‘Collision risk evaluation index based on deceleration for collision avoidance (second report) – forward obstacle collision warning system based on deceleration for collision avoidance’, Rev. Autom. Eng., 2009, 30, (4), pp. 439447.
        . Rev. Autom. Eng. , 4 , 439 - 447
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • S. Kitajima , Y. Marumo , T. Hiraoka , M. Itoh .
        14. Kitajima, S., Marumo, Y., Hiraoka, T., Itoh, M.: ‘Comparison of evaluation indices concerning estimation of driver's risk perception – risk perception of rear-end collision to a preceding vehicle’, Rev. Autom. Eng., 2009, 30, (2), pp. 191198.
        . Rev. Autom. Eng. , 2 , 191 - 198
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • T. Hiraoka , K. Nakata , M. Tanaka , H. Kumamoto .
        16. Hiraoka, T., Nakata, K., Tanaka, M., Kumamoto, H.: ‘Situation-adaptive warning timing of a forward obstacle collision warning system’. Proc. 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, CD-ROM, 2008.
        . Proc. 15th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, CD-ROM
    17. 17)
      • M. Ishibashi , M. Okuwa , M. Akamatsu .
        17. Ishibashi, M., Okuwa, M., Akamatsu, M.: ‘Development of driving style questionnaire and workload sensitivity questionnaire for drivers’ characteristic identification’. Proc. 2002 JSAE Annual Congress, 2002, no. 55-02, pp. 912.
        . Proc. 2002 JSAE Annual Congress , 9 - 12
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • S.H. Park , K. Kim .
        19. Park, S.H., Kim, K.: ‘Driver-view based augmented-reality HUD system: concept and background’. Proc. 19th ITS World Congress, Vienna, Austria, October 2012, Paper no. AP-00162.
        . Proc. 19th ITS World Congress
    20. 20)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0024
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0024
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address