Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Information modalities and timing of ecological driving support advices

Within this study the outcomes of two driving simulator studies are reported. In the first study, three different human–machine-interaction modalities for an ecological driving support system were compared concerning driving behaviour, workload and user acceptance parameters in order to find out whether a haptic acceleration/deceleration and gear shifting advice improved the ecological driving style additionally to a visual feedback system. Results showed that the combination of the visual and haptic modality led to the fastest reaction times and smallest deviations from the optimal acceleration and gear-shift behaviour. Yet, the results of the acceptance questionnaires revealed that the participants preferred the visual display, whereas the haptic feedback showed the best results regarding the workload scores. The second study dealt with the timing of the feedback. When should ecological coasting advices be presented in order to reach a high-user acceptance? As an outcome, the participants decelerated earlier receiving a coasting advice. However, if the advice was given too early the acceptance of the participants was low.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • 16. Kassner, A.: ‘Verbesserung der Wirkung und Akzeptanz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen durch Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen an den Fahrer’. Dissertation, Braunschweig, Berichte aus dem DLR-Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik, 2011, Band 14.
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • 12. Gonder, J., Earleywine, M., Sparks, W.: ‘Final report on the fuel saving effectiveness of various driver feedback approaches’. Milestone Report NREL/MP-5400–50836, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2011.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 12. Gonder, J., Earleywine, M., Sparks, W.: ‘Final report on the fuel saving effectiveness of various driver feedback approaches’. Milestone Report NREL/MP-5400–50836, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2011.
    16. 16)
      • 8. Várhelyi, A., Hjälmdahl, M., Hydén, C., Draskócszy, M.: ‘Effects of an active accelerator pedal on driver behavior and traffic safety after long-term use in urban areas’, Accident Anal. Prevention, 2004, 36, pp. 729737 (doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2003.06.001).
    17. 17)
      • 15. Pauzié, A., Pachiaudi, G.: ‘Subjective evaluation of the mental workload in driving context’, in Rothengatter, T., Carbonell Vaya, E. (Eds.): ‘Traffic and transport psychology: theory and application’ (1997), pp. 173182.
    18. 18)
      • 16. Kassner, A.: ‘Verbesserung der Wirkung und Akzeptanz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen durch Berücksichtigung der Anforderungen an den Fahrer’. Dissertation, Braunschweig, Berichte aus dem DLR-Institut für Verkehrssystemtechnik, 2011, Band 14.
    19. 19)
      • 13. Azzi, S., Reymond, G., Mérienne, F., Kemeny, A.: ‘Eco-driving performance assessment with in-car visual and haptic feedback assistance’, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 2011, 11, pp. 041005 15 (doi: 10.1115/1.3622753).
    20. 20)
      • 11. Mulder, M., Abbink, D.A., van Paassen, M.M., Mulder, M.: ‘Design of a haptic gas pedal for active car-following support’, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2011, 12, (1), pp. 268279 (doi: 10.1109/TITS.2010.2091407).
    21. 21)
      • 9. Birrel, S.A., Young, M.S., Weldon, A.M.: ‘Vibrotactile pedals: provision of haptic feedback to support economical driving’, Ergonomics, 2013, 56, (2), pp. 282292 (doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.760750).
    22. 22)
      • 7. Lange, C., Schmitt, G., Arcati, A., Bengler, K., Bubb, H.: ‘Haptic gear shifting indication: naturalistic driving study for parametrization, selection of variants and to determine the potential for fuel consumption reduction’. Proc. Third Int. Conf. Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Miami, 17–20 July 2010.
    23. 23)
      • 19. De Rosario, H., Louredo, M., Diaz, I., et al: ‘Efficacy and feeling of a vibrotactile frontal collision warning implemented in a haptic pedal’, Transp. Res. F, 2010, 13, pp. 8091 (doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2009.11.003).
    24. 24)
      • 1. European Commission: ‘White paper: roadmap to a single European transport area – towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’, 2011. Available at http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0144:FIN:EN:PDF, accessed August 2013.
    25. 25)
      • 17. Cohen, J.: ‘Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences’ (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988, 2nd edn.).
    26. 26)
      • 4. Wu, C., Zhao, G., Ou, B.: ‘A fuel economy optimization system with applications in vehicles with human drivers and autonomous vehicles’, Transp. Res. D, 2011, 16, pp. 515524 (doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.06.002).
    27. 27)
      • 10. Larsson, H., Ericsson, E.: ‘The effects of an acceleration advisory tool in vehicles for reduced fuel consumption and emissions’, Transp. Res. D, 2009, 14, pp. 141146 (doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2008.11.004).
    28. 28)
      • 5. Hallihan, G.M., Mayer, A.K., Caird, J.K., Milloy, S.L.: ‘The effects of a hybrid-interface on eco-driving and driver distraction’. TRB 90th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD, 2011.
    29. 29)
      • 14. van Driel, C.J.G., Hoedemaeker, M., van Arem, B.: ‘Impacts of a congestion assistant on driving behaviour and acceptance using a driving simulator’, Transp. Res. F, 2007, 10, pp. 139152 (doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2006.08.003).
    30. 30)
      • 20. Burke, J.L., Prewett, M.S., Gray, A.A., et al: ‘Comparing effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: a meta-analysis’. Proc. Eighth Int. Conf. Multimodal Interfaces (ICM 2006), New York, USA, 2006, pp. 108117.
    31. 31)
      • 6. Wickens, C.D.: ‘Multiple resources and performance prediction’, Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 2002, 3, pp. 159177 (doi: 10.1080/14639220210123806).
    32. 32)
      • 2. Eikelenberg, N., Vreeswijk, J., Lenz, S., et al: ‘Cooperative systems and services for energy efficiency: from inefficiency to efficiency’. ITS Europe Conf. Proc., 2011.
    33. 33)
      • 22. Adell, E., Várhelyi, A., Hjälmdahl, M.: ‘Auditory and haptic systems for in-car speed management – a comparative real life study’, Transp. Res. F, 2008, pp. 445458 (doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.04.003).
    34. 34)
      • 3. van der Voort, M., Dougherty, M.S., van Maarseveen, M.: ‘A prototype fuel-efficiency support tool’, Transp. Res. C, 2007, 9, pp. 279296 (doi: 10.1016/S0968-090X(00)00038-3).
    35. 35)
      • 18. Prewett, M., Ellio, L., Walvoord, A., Coovert, M.: ‘A meta-analysis of vibrotactile and visual information displays for improving task performance’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C: Appl. Rev., 2012, 42, (99), pp. 123132. IEEE, New York, USA (doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2103057).
    36. 36)
      • 21. Meschtscherjakov, A., Wilfinger, D., Scherndl, T., Tscheligi, M.: ‘Acceptance of future persuasive in-car interfaces towards a more economic driving behaviour’. Proc. First Int. Conf. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Essen, Germany, 2009.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0021
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0021
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address