Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Probability-based bus headway regularity measure

Probability-based bus headway regularity measure

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Intelligent Transport Systems — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

In frequently serviced bus routes passengers are more concerned about bus headway regularity than actual punctuality of bus arrival to the schedule. Buses arriving within very small (bus bunching) or very large headways are of particular concern and much less desirable. In this study, a time-point (stop) level probability-based headway regularity metric to measure bus service reliability is first formulated as a function of bus dwell time, number of stops into the trip, passenger activities (i.e. arrival, boarding and alighting) and expectation (or tolerance) of bus headways. The proposed metric is then applied to evaluate a Chicago Transit Authority bus route by using automatic vehicle location (AVL) data. It is found that headway regularity during a bus trip is closely impacted by dispatching headway. Furthermore, the time-point level service reliability declines as passenger activity levels increase or as the maximum passenger anticipated headway decreases (i.e. passengers become more demanding of frequent bus services). The case study demonstrates that the proposed probability-based headway regularity measure provides an operationable metric to transit agencies in terms of improving the transit service to meet passengers' expectation and thus increase ridership. Lastly, this study demonstrates another important application of the AVL/APC data.

References

    1. 1)
      • M.A. Turnquist . Strategies for improving bus transit service reliability. J. Transp. Res. Board, Transp. Res. Rec. , 7 - 13
    2. 2)
      • M. Hammerle , M. Haynes , S. McNeil . Use of automatic vehicle location and passenger count data to evaluate bus operations for the Chicago Transit Authority. J. Transp. Res. Board, Transp. Res. Rec. , 27 - 34
    3. 3)
      • P.G. Furth , Th.J. Muller . Service reliability and hidden waiting time: insights from AVL data. J. Transp. Res. Board, Transp. Res. Rec. , 79 - 87
    4. 4)
      • W.C. Jordan , M.A. Turnquist . Zone scheduling of bus routes to improve service reliability. Transp. Sci. , 3 , 242 - 269
    5. 5)
      • Hammerle, M.: `Analysis of automatic vehicle location and passenger count data for the Chicago Transit Authority', 2004, Master's, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois Chicago.
    6. 6)
      • G.F. Newell . Dispatching policies for transportation route. Transp. Sci. , 1 , 91 - 105
    7. 7)
      • Y.J. Nakanishi . Bus performance indicators on-time performance and service regularity. J. Transp. Res. Board, Transp. Res. Rec. , 3 - 13
    8. 8)
      • J. Lin , P. Wang , D. Barnum . A quality control framework for bus schedule reliability. Transp. Res. Part E: Transp. Rev. Logist. , 6 , 1086 - 1098
    9. 9)
      • J.G. Strathman , T.J. Kimpel , K.J. Dueker , R.L. Gerhart , S. Callas . Evaluation of transit operations: data applications of Tri-Met's automated bus dispatching system. Transportation , 321 - 345
    10. 10)
      • V.R. Vuchic . (2004) Urban transit: operations, planning, and economics.
    11. 11)
      • L. Fu , X. Yang . Design and implementation of bus-holding control strategies with real-time information. J. Transp. Res. Board, Transp. Res. Rec. , 6 - 12
    12. 12)
      • , : `A guidebook for developing a transit performance-measurement system', A transit cooperative research program (TCRP) Report No. 88, 2003, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
    13. 13)
      • R.L. Bertini , A. Ei-Geneidy . Generating transit performance measures with archived data. J. Transp. Res. Board, Transp. Res. Rec. , 109 - 119
    14. 14)
      • E.E. Osuna , G.F. Newell . Control strategies for an idealized public transportation system. Transp. Sci. , 1 , 52 - 72
    15. 15)
      • Chicago Transit Authority, website:www.transitchicago.com, last accessed October 2008.
    16. 16)
      • (1995) Bus route evaluation standards, synthesis of transit practice 10.
    17. 17)
      • A. Polus . Modeling and measurements of bus service reliability. Transp. Res. , 4 , 253 - 256
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2008.0088
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-its.2008.0088
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address