Analysis and design of coded apertures for defocus deblurring based on imaging system properties and optical features

Analysis and design of coded apertures for defocus deblurring based on imaging system properties and optical features

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Image Processing — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

As the physical size of single pixels in digital cameras grows smaller, the captured images are increasingly affected by defocused blurring and consequently valuable details are lost. Different aperture patterns have already been proposed to mitigate this problem based on presumed conditions, which maybe violated in practise. Sensor characteristics and current photometric scene properties have been largely ignored in the design of aperture patterns in the literature. In this study, a number of perceptually optimised coded apertures are introduced for defocused deblurring. These apertures are specifically designed considering illumination conditions, sensor specifications and human visual system characteristics. The designed patterns are compared with circular apertures of equal throughput and pinhole aperture. Experiments show signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) gains of up to 0.35 and 2 dB over circular and pinhole apertures, respectively. To study the trade-off between diffraction and deblurring gains, the proposed binary masks are enhanced by smoothing and morphological operations, which can yield non-binary and rounded binary patterns. The results of the authors’ study show that rounded binary patterns improve diffraction behaviour while maintaining the desired SNR level.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Levin, A., Fergus, R., Durand, F., et al: ‘Image and depth from a conventional camera with a coded aperture’, ACM Trans. Graph., 2007, 26, (3), p. 70.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Sellent, A., Favaro, P.: ‘Which side of the focal plane are you on?’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computational Photography (ICCP), Santa Clara, CA, May 2014, pp. 18.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Sellent, A., Favaro, P.: ‘Optimized aperture shapes for depth estimation’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2014, 40, pp. 96103.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Lin, J., Lin, X., Ji, X., et al: ‘Separable coded aperture for depth from a single image’, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 2014, 21, (12), pp. 14711475.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Veeraraghavan, A., Raskar, R., Agrawal, A., et al: ‘Dappled photography: mask enhanced cameras for heterodyned light fields and coded aperture refocusing’, ACM Trans. Graph., 2007, 26, (3), p. 69.
    6. 6)
      • 6. Zhou, C., Nayar, S.: ‘What are good apertures for defocus deblurring?’. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computational Photography (ICCP), San Francisco, CA, April 2009, pp. 18.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Masia, B., Presa, L., Corrales, A., et al: ‘Perceptually optimized coded apertures for defocus deblurring’, Comput. Graph. Forum, 2012, 31, (6), pp. 18671879.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Cossairt, O., Gupta, M., Nayar, S.K.: ‘When does computational imaging improve performance?’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2013, 22, (2), pp. 447458.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Mitra, K., Cossairt, O., Veeraraghavan, A.: ‘A framework for analysis of computational imaging systems: role of signal prior, sensor noise and multiplexing’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2014, 36, (10), pp. 19091921.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Agrawal, A., Raskar, R.: ‘Optimal single image capture for motion deblurring’. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Miami, FL, June 2009, pp. 25602567.
    11. 11)
      • 11. ‘ANDOR-Technology. Digital Camera Fundamentals’. Available at, accessed January 2015.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Farrell, J.E., Catrysse, P.B., Wandell, B.A.: ‘Digital camera simulation’, Appl. Opt., 2012, 51, (4), pp. A80A90.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Liu, C., Szeliski, R., Kanget, S.B., et al: ‘Automatic estimation and removal of noise from a single image’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2008, 30, (2), pp. 299314.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Martinello, M.: ‘Coded aperture imaging’. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, 2012.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Cossairt, O.: ‘Tradeoffs and limits in computational imaging’. PhD thesis, Columbia University, 2011.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Lin, W., Kuo, C.-C.J.: ‘Perceptual visual quality metrics: a survey’, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., 2011, 22, (4), pp. 297312.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Mannos, J.L., Sakrison, D.J.: ‘The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images’, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 1974, 20, (4), pp. 525536.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Weiss, Y., Freeman, W.T.: ‘What makes a good model of natural images?’. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Minneapolis, MN, June 2007, pp. 18.
    19. 19)
      • 20. Gao, Y.: ‘Population size and sampling complexity in genetic algorithms’. Proc. of the Bird of a Feather Workshops (GECCO03), Chicago, IL, July 2003, pp. 178181.
    20. 20)
      • 21. Moon, C., Kim, J., Choiet, G., et al: ‘An efficient genetic algorithm for the traveling salesman problem with precedence constraints’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2002, 140, (3), pp. 606617.
    21. 21)
      • 22. Hecht, E.: ‘Optics’ (Addison Wesley Press, San Francisco, CA, 2002, 4th edn.).
    22. 22)
      • 23. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: ‘Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment’. Proc. IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, November 2003, pp. 13981402.
    23. 23)
      • 24. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C.: ‘Image information and visual quality’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2006, 15, (2), pp. 430444.
    24. 24)
      • 25. Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: ‘A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2006, 15, (11), pp. 34403451.
    25. 25)
      • 26. Lahoulou, A., Bouridane, A., Viennet, E., et al: ‘Full-reference image quality metrics performance evaluation over image quality databases’, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2013, 38, (9), pp. 23272356.
    26. 26)
      • 27. Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Zelensky, A., et al: ‘TID2008-A database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics’, Adv. Mod. Radioelectron., 2009, 10, (4), pp. 3045.
    27. 27)
      • 28. Mitra, K., Cossairt, O., Veeraraghavan, A.: ‘To denoise or deblur: parameter optimization for imaging systems’. Proc. Int. Society for Optics and Photonics, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, San Francisco, CA, February 2014, p. 90230G.
    28. 28)
      • 29. Zhou, C., Lin, S., Nayar, S.K.: ‘Coded aperture pairs for depth from defocus and defocus deblurring’, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 2011, 93, (1), pp. 5372.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address