Speckle filtering is of great interest for the ultrasound medical images in which various noises and artefacts are introduced because of various limitations of the acquisition systems and techniques. Speckle is a prime factor to degrade the quality and most importantly, texture information present in the ultrasound images. This study presents a despeckling method based on a modified non-linear diffusion model and non-subsampled shearlet transform (NSST). As a new image representation method with the different features of localisation, directionality and multiscale, the NSST is utilised to provide the effective representation of the image coefficients. The modified anisotropic diffusion is applied to the noisy coarser NSST coefficients to improve the denoising efficiency and preserve the edge features effectively. In the diffusion process, the non-local pixel information is incorporated to evaluate the gradient of eight connected neighbouring pixels with an adaptive grey variance. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated for both the standard test and real ultrasound images. Experimental results show that the proposed method produces better results of noise suppression with the preservation of more edges compared with several existing methods.

References

1. 1)
  - 29. Qiguang, M., Pengfei, X., Tiange, L., Yun, Y., Junying, Z., Weisheng, L.: ‘Linear feature separation from topographic maps using energy density and the shear transform’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2013, 22, (4), pp. 1548–1558 (doi: 10.1109/TIP.2012.2233487).
2. 2)
  - P. Perona , J. Malik . Scale-space and edge detection using anistropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 7 , 629 - 639
3. 3)
  - 4. Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: ‘Digital image processing’ (Prentice-Hall, 2001).
4. 4)
  - J.S. Lee . Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 2 , 165 - 168
5. 5)
  - K. Guo , D. Labate . Optimally sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 1 , 298 - 318
6. 6)
  - 40. Coupe, P., Hellier, P., Kervrann, C., Barillot, C.: ‘Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2009, 18, (10), pp. 2221–2229 (doi: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2024064).
7. 7)
  - Z. Wang , A.C. Bovik , H.R. Sheikh , E.P. Simoncelli . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. , 4 , 600 - 613
8. 8)
  - D.L. Donoho , I.M. Johnstone . Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. , 1200 - 1224
9. 9)
  - 23. Lee, M.-S., Yen, C.-L., Ueng, S.-K.: ‘Speckle reduction with edges preservation for ultrasound images: using function spaces approach’, IET Image Process., 2012, 6, (7), pp. 813–821 (doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2011.0366).
10. 10)
  - 19. Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.-M.: ‘A non-local algorithm for image denoising’. Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, pp. 60–65.
11. 11)
  - 16. Tauber, C., Batatia, H., Ayache, A.: ‘A robust speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion’. Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing, 2004, pp. 247–250.
12. 12)
  - D.T. Kuan , A.A. Sawchuk , T.C. Strand , P. Chavel . Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 2 , 165 - 177
13. 13)
  - 42. Gupta, D., Anand, R.S., Tyagi, B.: ‘Enhancement of medical ultrasound images using multiscale discrete shearlet transform based thresholding’. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Electronic System Design, 2012, pp. 286–290.
14. 14)
  - D.L. Donoho . ’ Denoising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. , 3 , 613 - 627
15. 15)
  - 32. Yi, S., Labate, D., Easley, G.R., Krim, H.: ‘Edge detection and processing using shearlets’. Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process., 2008, pp. 1148–1151.
16. 16)
  - 11. Bhutada, G.G., Anand, R.S., Saxena, S.C.: ‘Image enhancement by wavelet-based thresholding neural network with adaptive learning rate’, IET Image Process., 2011, 5, (7), pp. 573–582 (doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2010.0014).
17. 17)
  - 36. Hou, B., Zhang, X., Bu, X., Feng, H.: ‘SAR image despeckling based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform’, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observations and Remote Sens., 2012, 5, (3), pp. 809–823 (doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2196680).
18. 18)
  - Y.J. Yu , S.T. Acton . Speckle reduction anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Image Process. , 11 , 1260 - 1270
19. 19)
  - M.R. Hajiaboli . An anisotropic fourth-order diffusion filter for image noise removal. Int. J. Comput. Vis. , 177 - 191
20. 20)
  - 30. Qiguang, M., Cheng, S., Pengfei, X.: ‘A novel algorithm of image fusion based on shearlets and PCNN’. Neurocomputing, 2012.
21. 21)
  - 17. Chao, S.-M., Tsai, D.-M.: ‘An improved anisotropic diffusion model for detail- and edge-preserving smoothing’, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 2010, 31, (13), pp. 2012–2023 (doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.06.004).
22. 22)
  - 34. Gupta, D., Anand, R.S., Tyagi, B.: ‘Edge preserved enhancement of medical images using adaptive fusion–based denoising by shearlet transform and total variation algorithm’, J. Electron. Imaging, 2013, 22, (4), pp. 1–18 (doi: 10.1117/1.JEI.22.4.043016).
23. 23)
  - 21. Gupta, S., Chauhan, R.C., Sexana, S.C.: ‘Wavelet-based statistical approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images’, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 2004, 42, (2), pp. 189–192 (doi: 10.1007/BF02344630).
24. 24)
  - T. Loupas , W.N. Mcdicken , P.L. Allan . An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. , 129 - 135
25. 25)
  - 24. Qin, S., Yang, C., Tang, B., Tan, S.: ‘The denoise based on translation invariance wavelet transform and its applications’. Proc. A Conf. Structural Dynamics, 2002, pp. 783–787.
26. 26)
  - 22. Thakur, A., Anand, R.S.: ‘Image quality based comparative evaluation of wavelet filters in ultrasound speckle reduction’, Dig. Signal Process., 2005, 15, (5), pp. 455–465 (doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2005.01.002).
27. 27)
  - 8. Liu, X., Liu, J., Xu, X., Chun, L., Tang, J., Deng, Y.: ‘A robust detail preserving anisotropic diffusion for speckle reduction in ultrasound images’, BMC Genomics, 2011, 12, (Suppl 5), p. S14 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-S5-S14).
28. 28)
  - G. Easley , D. Labate , W.Q. Lim . Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. , 25 - 46
29. 29)
  - 33. Guorong, G., Luping, X., Dongzhu, F.: ‘Multi-focus image fusion based on non-subsampled shearlet transform’, IET Image Process., 2013, 7, (6), pp. 633–639 (doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2012.0558).
30. 30)
  - 1. Dhawan, A.P.: ‘Medical image analysis’ (Wiley, 2003).
31. 31)
  - F. Catte , P.L. Lions , J.M. Morel , T. Coll . Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 1 , 182 - 193
32. 32)
  - 16. Miao, Q., Shi, C., Xu, P., Yang, M., Shi, Y.: ‘A novel algorithm of image fusion using shearlets’, Opt. Commun., 2011, 284, (6), pp. 1540–1547 (doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2010.11.048).
33. 33)
  - 9. Fan, Z., Yang Mo, Y., Koh Liang, M., Yongmin, K.: ‘Nonlinear diffusion in laplacian pyramid domain for ultrasonic speckle reduction’, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2007, 26, (2), pp. 200–211 (doi: 10.1109/TMI.2006.889735).
34. 34)
  - 31. Easley, G.R., Labate, D., Colonna, F.: ‘Shearlet-based total variation diffusion for denoising’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2009, 18, (2), pp. 260–268 (doi: 10.1109/TIP.2008.2008070).
35. 35)
  - J.L. Starck , E.J. Candès , D.L. Donoho . The curvelet transform for imaging denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. , 6 , 670 - 684
36. 36)
  - 18. Nikpour, M., Hassanpour, H.: ‘Using diffusion equations for improving performance of wavelet-based image denoising techniques’, IET Image Process., 2010, 4, (6), pp. 452–462 (doi: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2009.0180).
37. 37)
  - 2. Mittal, D., Kumar, V., Saxena, S., Khandelwal, N., Kalra, N.: ‘Enhancement of the ultrasound images by modified anisotropic diffusion method’, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 2010, 48, (12), pp. 1281–1291 (doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0650-x).
38. 38)
  - M.N. Do , M. Vetterli . The finite ridgelet transform for image representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. , 1 , 16 - 28
39. 39)
  - 3. Pratt, W.K.: ‘Digital image processing’ (John Wiley and Sons, 2006).
40. 40)
  - 27. Guo, K., Kutyniok, G., Labate, D.: ‘Sparse multidimensional representations using anisotropic dilation and shear operators’, in Chen, G., Lai, M.J., (Eds.): ‘Wavelets and Splines’ (Athens, GA, 2005), (Nashboro Press, Nashville, TN, 2006), pp. 189–201.
41. 41)
  - 41. Yang, M., Liang, J., Zhang, J., Gao, H., Meng, F., Xingdong, L., Song, S.-J.: ‘Non-local means theory based Perona–Malik model for image denoising’, Neurocomputing, 2013, 120, (23), pp. 262–267 (doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.08.063).
42. 42)
  - 28. Labate, D., Lim, W.-Q., Kutyniok, G., Weiss, G.: ‘Sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets’. Proc. SPIE 5914, Bellingham, WA, 2005, pp. 254–262.
43. 43)
  - 38. Jianwei, M., Plonka, G.: ‘Combined curvelet shrinkage and nonlinear anisotropic diffusion’, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2007, 16, (9), pp. 2198–2206 (doi: 10.1109/TIP.2007.902333).
44. 44)
  - 37. Aili, W., Ye, Z., Shaoliang, M., Mingji, Y.: ‘Image denoising method based on curvelet transform’. Proc. IEEE Conf. Industrial Electronics and Applications., 2008, pp. 571–574.

Speckle filtering of ultrasound images using a modified non-linear diffusion model in non-subsampled shearlet domain

References

Related content