© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
A wavelet-based technique for blind deconvolution and denoising of ultrasound scans is introduced. The target application is near-field ultrasound imaging for non-destructive testing. Existing blind deconvolution techniques for ultrasound such as cepstrum-based methods and the work of Adam and Michailovich – based on discrete wavelet transform (DWT) shrinkage of the log-spectrum – estimate the pulse by exploiting the pulse log-spectrum smoothness relative to the material reflectivity function. In the proposed technique, the log-spectrum is localised with respect to time as the continuous wavelet transform (CWT) log-scalogram to deal with the non-stationarity of the near-field ultrasound signals in both the pulse estimation and deconvolution. The pulse is estimated in the wavelet domain via DWT shrinkage of the log-scalogram and is deconvolved by wavelet-domain Wiener filtering. Extensions of the proposed technique include: using separate CWT domains for estimation and deconvolution, as inspired by the WienerChop denoising method; and training the algorithm parameters on a subset of scans.
References
-
-
1)
-
16. Biemond, J., Lagendijk, R.L., Mersereau, R.M.: ‘Iterative methods for image deblurring’, Proc. IEEE, 1990, 78, (5), pp. 856–883 (doi: 10.1109/5.53403).
-
2)
-
24. Taylor, J.R.B., Chan, J.J.M., Thomas, G.: ‘Frequency selection for compounding synthetic aperture ultrasound images’. 2012 IEEE Int. Conf. Imaging Systems and Techniques, July 2012, pp. 74–77.
-
3)
-
17. Oruklu, E., Aslan, S., Saniie, J.: ‘Applications of time-frequency distributions for ultrasonic flaw detection’. 2009 IEEE Int. Ultrasonics Symp., September 2009, pp. 2000–2003.
-
4)
-
11. Lopez Sanchez, A., Schmerr, L.W.: ‘Characterization of an ultrasonic nondestructive measurement system’, October 2006.
-
5)
-
21. Hyeokho, C., Baraniuk, R.: ‘Analysis of wavelet-domain Wiener filters’. Proc. IEEE-SP Int. Symp. Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis, October 1998, pp. 613–616.
-
6)
-
3. Fernandez-Caballero, A., Mateo, J.L.: ‘Methodological approach to reducing speckle noise in ultrasound images’. Int. Conf. BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, 2008, vol. 2, pp. 147–154.
-
7)
-
5. Neelamani, R.N., Hyeokho, C., Baraniuk, R.: ‘ForWaRD: Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution for ill-conditioned systems’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2004, 52, (2), pp. 418–433 (doi: 10.1109/TSP.2003.821103).
-
8)
-
1. Thomas, G., Flores-Tapia, D., Pistorius, S.: ‘Frequency compounding of synthetic aperture ultrasound imagery using multiscale products’. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf., 2010, pp. 702–705.
-
9)
-
D.L. Donoho
.
’ Denoising by soft-thresholding.
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
,
3 ,
613 -
627
-
10)
-
26. Esteller, R., Vachtsevanos, G., Echauz, J., Litt, B.: ‘A comparison of waveform fractal dimension algorithms’, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl., 2001, 48, (2), pp. 177–183 (doi: 10.1109/81.904882).
-
11)
-
12. Liu, C.N., Fatemi, M., Wagg, R.C.: ‘Digital processing for improvement of ultrasonic abdominal images’, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 1983, 2, (2), pp. 66–75 (doi: 10.1109/TMI.1983.4307617).
-
12)
-
14. Jensen, J.A., Leeman, S.: ‘Nonparametric estimation of ultrasound pulses’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1994, 41, (10), pp. 929–936 (doi: 10.1109/10.324524).
-
13)
-
23. Thomas, G., Flores, B.C., Flores-Tapia, D.: ‘ISAR motion compensation using entropy metrics’. 2007 IET Int. Conf. Radar Systems, October 2007, pp. 1–4.
-
14)
-
10. Xu, Q., Wan, S., Pei, W., Yang, L.: ‘Ultrasonic image processing using wavelet based deconvolution’. Proc. 2003 Int. Conf. Neural Networks and Signal Processing, December 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1013–1016.
-
15)
-
18. Thomas, G., Brito, A.E.: ‘Noise suppression and component extraction of underwater acoustic signals’. Proc. MTS/IEEE Conf. OCEANS'97, October 1997, vol. 2, pp. 1353–1358.
-
16)
-
9. Aussel, J.D., Monchalin, J.P.: ‘Structure noise reduction and deconvolution of ultrasonic data using wavelet decomposition (ultrasonic flaw detection)’, Proc. IEEE 1989 Ultrason. Symp., 1989, 2, pp. 1139–1144.
-
17)
-
25. Arjunan, S.P., Kumar, D.K.: ‘Fractal based modelling and analysis of Electromyography (EMG) to identify subtle actions’. 29th Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering Medicine and Biology Society, August 2007, pp. 1961–1964.
-
18)
-
19. Unser, M.: ‘Wavelets, statistics, and biomedical applications’. Proc. Eighth IEEE Signal Processing. Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing, June 1996, pp. 244–249.
-
19)
-
7. Donoho, D.L., Johnstone, I.M.: ‘Threshold selection for wavelet shrinkage of noisy data’. Proc. 16th Annual Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers, November 1994, vol. 1, pp. A24–A25.
-
20)
-
20. Ghael, S.P., Sayeed, A.M., Baraniuk, R.: ‘Improved wavelet denoising via empirical wiener filtering’. Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, July 1997, vol. 3169, pp. 389–399.
-
21)
-
15. Herrera, R.H., Orazco, R., Rodriguez, M.: ‘Wavelet-based deconvolution of ultrasonic signals in nondestructive evaluation’, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, 2006, 7, (10), pp. 1748–1756 (doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.A1748).
-
22)
-
2. Adam, D., Michailovich, O.: ‘Blind deconvolution of ultrasound sequences using nonparametric local polynomial estimates of the pulse’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2002, 49, (2), pp. 118–131 (doi: 10.1109/10.979351).
-
23)
-
22. Bandler, J.W.: ‘Optimization methods for computer-aided design’, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 1969, 17, (8), pp. 533–552 (doi: 10.1109/TMTT.1969.1127005).
-
24)
-
4. Mukkavilli, R.K., Sahambi, J.S., Bora, P.K.: ‘Modified homomorphic wavelet based despeckling of medical ultrasound images’. Canadian Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering, May 2008, pp. 887–890.
-
25)
-
6. San Emeterio, J.L., Rodriguez-Hernandez, M.A.: ‘Wavelet denoising of ultrasonic A-scans for detection of weak signals’. 19th Int. Conf. Systems, Signals and Image Processing, April 2012, pp. 48–51.
-
26)
-
13. Chira, L.T., Girault, J.M., Rusu, C.: ‘Envelope based nonlinear blind deconvolution approach for ultrasound imaging’, Carpathian J. Electron. Comput. Eng., 2012, 5, (1), pp. 39–43.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2013.0791
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2013.0791
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6