access icon free Effective fuzzy clustering algorithm with Bayesian model and mean template for image segmentation

Fuzzy c-means (FCMs) with spatial constraints have been considered as an effective algorithm for image segmentation. The well-known Gaussian mixture model (GMM) has also been regarded as a useful tool in several image segmentation applications. In this study, the authors propose a new algorithm to incorporate the merits of these two approaches and reveal some intrinsic relationships between them. In the authors model, the new objective function pays more attention on spatial constraints and adopts Gaussian distribution as the distance function. Thus, their model can degrade to the standard GMM as a special case. Our algorithm is fully free of the empirically pre-defined parameters that are used in traditional FCM methods to balance between robustness to noise and effectiveness of preserving the image sharpness and details. Furthermore, in their algorithm, the prior probability of an image pixel is influenced by the fuzzy memberships of pixels in its immediate neighbourhood to incorporate the local spatial information and intensity information. Finally, they utilise the mean template instead of the traditional hidden Markov random field (HMRF) model for estimation of prior probability. The mean template is considered as a spatial constraint for collecting more image spatial information. Compared with HMRF, their method is simple, easy and fast to implement. The performance of their proposed algorithm, compared with state-of-the-art technologies including extensions of possibilistic fuzzy c-means (PFCM), GMM, FCM, HMRF and their hybrid models, demonstrates its improved robustness and effectiveness.

Inspec keywords: probability; pattern clustering; image segmentation; Bayes methods; fuzzy set theory; Gaussian distribution

Other keywords: immediate neighbourhood; prior probability; Gaussian mixture model; prior probability estimation; Bayesian model; image spatial information; image pixel; distance function; objective function; mean template; GMM; hidden Markov random field model; spatial constraints; image sharpness; image segmentation; Gaussian distribution; fuzzy memberships; intensity information; FCM methods; fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm; HMRF model; local spatial information

Subjects: Computer vision and image processing techniques; Combinatorial mathematics; Combinatorial mathematics; Other topics in statistics; Data handling techniques; Other topics in statistics; Optical, image and video signal processing

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • 28. Available at http://www.web.mac.com/soteri0s/Sotirios_Chatzis/Software.html.
    8. 8)
      • 24. Ichihashi, H., Miyagishi, K., Honda, K.: ‘Fuzzy c-means clustering with regularization by K-L information’. Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Systems, 2001, pp. 924927.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 29. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., Malik, J.: ‘A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics’. Proc. Eighth IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Vision, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 416423.
    11. 11)
      • 5. Bezdek, J.: ‘Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms’ (Plenum, New York, 1981).
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 33. Unnikrishnan, R., Hebert, M.: ‘Measures of similarity’. Proc. IEEE Workshop Computer Vision and Applications, 2005, pp. 394400.
    14. 14)
      • 34. Liu, J., Yang, Y.H.: ‘Multiresolution color image segmentation’, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2005, 16, (7), pp. 530549.
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • 1. McLachlan, G., Peel, D.: ‘Finite mixture models’ (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2000).
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • 2. Bishop, C.M.: ‘Pattern recognition and machine learning’ (Springer, 2006).
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • 30. Wyszecki, G., Stiles, W.S.: ‘Color science—concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae’ (Wiley Inter-Science Publications, New York, 2000).
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
      • 13. Ramathilaga, S., Leu, J.J.Y., Huang, Y.M.: ‘Adapted mean variable distance to fuzzy-C means for effective image clustering’. 2011 First Int. Conf. Robot, Vision and Signal Processing (RVSP), 2011, pp. 4851.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • 32. Unnikrishnan, R., Pantofaru, C., Hebert, M.: ‘A measure for objective evaluation of image segmentation algorithms’, IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2005, 3, pp. 3441.
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
      • 31. Hanmandlu, M., Verma, O.P., Susan, S., Madasu, V.K.: ‘Color segmentation by fuzzy co-clustering of chrominance color features’, Neurocomputing, In press, 2013.
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
      • 12. Tran, D., Wagner, M.: ‘Fuzzy Gaussian mixture models for speaker recognition’, Spec. Issue Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst. (AJIIPS), 1998, 5, (4), pp. 293300.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • 27. Available at http://www.infoman.teikav.edu.gr/~stkrini/pages/develop/FLICM/FLICM.html.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2013.0178
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-ipr.2013.0178
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading