Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Application of probabilistic neural network for differential relaying of power transformer

Application of probabilistic neural network for differential relaying of power transformer

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Investigations towards the applicability of probabilistic neural networks (PNNs) as core classifiers to discriminate between magnetising inrush and internal fault of power transformer are made. An algorithm has been developed around the theme of conventional differential protection of transformer. It makes use of the ratio of the voltage-to-frequency and the amplitude of differential current for the detection of the operating condition of the transformer. The PNN has a significant advantage in terms of a much faster learning capability because it is constructed with a single pass of exemplar pattern set and without any iteration for weight adaptation. For the evaluation of the developed algorithm, transformer modelling and simulation of fault are carried out in power system computer-aided designing PSCAD/EMTDC. The operating condition detection algorithm is implemented in MATLAB.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • A.G. Phadke , J.S. Thorp . A new computer based flux-restrained current differential relay for power transformer protection. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. , 11 , 3624 - 3629
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Specht, D.F., Shapiro, P.D.: `Generalization accuracy of probabilistic neural networks compared with back-propagation networks', IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, 1991, Seattle, 1, p. 887–892.
    5. 5)
      • M.H. Hammond , C.J. Riedel , S.L. Rose-Pehrsson , F.W. Williams . Training set optimization methods for a probabilistic neural network. Elsevier Sci., Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. , 1 , 73 - 78
    6. 6)
      • T. Cover , P. Hart . Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 1 , 21 - 27
    7. 7)
      • M.R. Berthold , J. Diamond . Constructive training of probabilistic neural networks. Elsevier Sci. Neurocomput. , 167 - 183
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
      • A.R. Web . (2002) Statistical pattern recognition.
    10. 10)
      • Washburne, T.P., Okamura, M.M., Specht, D.F., Fisher, W.A.: `The lockheed probabilistic neural network processor', IEEE Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, 1991, Seattle, 1, p. 513–518.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • Specht, D.F.: `Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, 1992, 1, p. 761–767.
    14. 14)
      • P. Torf , R. Wojcik . Local probabilistic neural networks in hydrology. Elsevier Sci., Phys. Chem. Earth (B) , 1 , 9 - 14
    15. 15)
      • X. Ma , J. Shi . A new method for discrimination between fault and magnetizing inrush current using H.M.M.. Elsevier Sci. Electr. Power Syst. Res. , 1 , 43 - 49
    16. 16)
      • Aibe, N., Yasunaga, M., Yoshihara, I., Kim, J.H.: `A probabilistic neural network hardware system using a learning parameter parallel architecture', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, 12–17 May 2002, 3, p. 2270–2275.
    17. 17)
      • M.S. Sachdev . (1988) Microprocessor relays and protection systems, IEEE Tutorial Course Text.
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • R.P. Maheshwari , H.K. Verma . Adaptive digital differential relay of parabolic characteristic for transformer protection. Taylor and Francis, Electr. Mach. Power Syst. , 5 , 459 - 473
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
      • P. Burrascano . Learning vector quantization for the probabilistic neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw , 4 , 111 - 121
    22. 22)
      • N.K. Bose , P. Liang . (1996) Neural network fundamentals with graphs, algorithms, andapplications.
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
      • Z. Moravej , D.N. Vishwakarma , S.P. Singh . Application of radial basis function neural network for differential relaying of a power transformer. Elsevier Sci., Comput. Electric. Eng. , 3 , 421 - 434
    26. 26)
      • Minchin, G., Zaknich, A.: `A design for implementation of the probabilistic neural network', Proc. IEEE TCONI ‘99, 1999, p. 556–559.
    27. 27)
      • Z. Moravej . ANN-based harmonic restraint differential protection of power transformer. IE (I) J. Electron. Lett. , 1 , 1 - 6
    28. 28)
      • M.J. Heathcote . (2007) The J&P transformer book.
    29. 29)
      • Specht, D.F.: `Probabilistic neural networks for classification, mapping, or associative memory', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, July 1988, 1, p. 525–532.
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
      • Musavi, M.T., Kalantri, K., Ahmed, W.: `Improving the performance of probabilistic neural networks', Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, 1992, 1, p. 595–600.
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
      • L.G. Perez , A.J. Flechsig , J.L. Meador , Z. Obradovic. . Training an artificial neural network to discriminate between magnetizing inrush and internal faults. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. , 1 , 431 - 441
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd_20050273
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd_20050273
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address