Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Portfolio management of battery storages in multiple electricity markets

A battery storage can diversify its portfolio by participating in the energy market, regulation market, and point-to-point (PTP) obligation market. In order for a battery storage to maximise profits and hedge risks, a portfolio management model that co-optimises a storage's bids in these three markets is proposed. The proposed model is trained and validated by real market data. The performance of the proposed portfolio is compared with the portfolio without consideration of PTP obligation, indicating that the proposed method is effective in risk hedging. Numerical results also show the trade-off between storage's expected profits and risks, which can be useful for a battery storage owner with a certain degree of risk aversion.

References

    1. 1)
      • 20. Apostolopoulou, D., Gross, G., Guler, T.: ‘Optimized FTR portfolio construction based on the identification of congested network elements’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (4), pp. 49684978.
    2. 2)
      • 11. Feng, D., Gan, D., Zhong, J., et al: ‘Supplier asset allocation in a pool-based electricity market’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (3), pp. 11291138.
    3. 3)
      • 17. Li, T., Shahidehpour, M.: ‘Risk-constrained FTR bidding strategy in transmission markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (2), pp. 10141021.
    4. 4)
      • 24. Chen, S., Chen, Q., Xu, Y.: ‘Strategic bidding and compensation mechanism for a load aggregator with direct thermostat control capabilities’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2018, 9, (3), pp. 23272336.
    5. 5)
      • 29. Lofberg, J.: ‘YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB’. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508), New Orleans, LA, USA, September 2004, pp. 284289.
    6. 6)
      • 4. Kazemi, M., Zareipour, H., Amjady, N., et al: ‘Operation scheduling of battery storage systems in joint energy and ancillary services markets’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2017, 8, (4), pp. 17261735.
    7. 7)
      • 25. ERCOT Market Information’: Available at http://www.ercot.com/mktinfo/.
    8. 8)
      • 9. Goebel, C., Hesse, H., Schimpe, M., et al: ‘Model-based dispatch strategies for lithium-ion battery energy storage applied to pay-as-bid markets for secondary reserve’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (4), pp. 27242734.
    9. 9)
      • 8. Han, D., Sun, W., Fan, X.: ‘Dynamic energy management in smart grid: a fast randomized first-order optimization algorithm’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2018, 94, pp. 179187.
    10. 10)
      • 19. Babayiǧit, C., Rocha, P., Das, T.K.: ‘A two-tier matrix game approach for obtaining joint bidding strategies in FTR and energy markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2010, 25, (3), pp. 12111219.
    11. 11)
      • 10. Khani, H., Zadeh, M.R.D.: ‘Online adaptive real-time optimal dispatch of privately owned energy storage systems using public-domain electricity market prices’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 30, (2), pp. 930938.
    12. 12)
      • 13. De La Nieta, A.A.S., Contreras, J., Munoz, J.I.: ‘Optimal coordinated wind-hydro bidding strategies in day-ahead markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 798809.
    13. 13)
      • 15. Rodrigues, T., Ramírez, P.J., Strbac, G.: ‘Risk-averse bidding of energy and spinning reserve by wind farms with on-site energy storage’, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2018, 12, (2), pp. 165173.
    14. 14)
      • 26. Yu, J., Wang, S.X.: ‘A study of ERCOT real-time energy market price’. 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Que., Canada, June 2006.
    15. 15)
      • 22. Zugno, M., Conejo, A.J.: ‘A robust optimization approach to energy and reserve dispatch in electricity markets’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2015, 247, (2), pp. 659671.
    16. 16)
      • 21. Melgar-Dominguez, O.D., Pourakbari-Kasmaei, M., Mantovani, J.R.S.: ‘Adaptive robust short-term planning of electrical distribution systems considering siting and sizing of renewable energy-based DG units’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2828778.
    17. 17)
      • 27. Catalão, J.P.S., Pousinho, H.M.I., Mendes, V.M.F.: ‘Optimal offering strategies for wind power producers considering uncertainty and risk’, IEEE Syst. J., 2012, 6, (2), pp. 270277.
    18. 18)
      • 28. One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test’: Available at: http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/kstest.html.
    19. 19)
      • 2. Dominguez, O.D.M., Kasmaei, M.P., Lavorato, M., et al: ‘Optimal siting and sizing of renewable energy sources, storage devices, and reactive support devices to obtain a sustainable electrical distribution systems’, Energy Syst., 2018, 9, (3), pp. 529550.
    20. 20)
      • 3. Delgado-Antillón, C.P., Domínguez-Navarro, J.A.: ‘Probabilistic siting and sizing of energy storage systems in distribution power systems based on the islanding feature’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2018, 155, pp. 225235.
    21. 21)
      • 7. Ghamkhari, M., Wierman, A., Mohsenian-Rad, H.: ‘Energy portfolio optimization of data centers’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2017, 8, (4), pp. 18981910.
    22. 22)
      • 5. Lu, N., Chow, J.H., Desrochers, A.A.: ‘Pumped-storage hydro-turbine bidding strategies in a competitive electricity market’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (2), pp. 834841.
    23. 23)
      • 14. Freire, L., Street, A., Lima, D.A., et al: ‘A hybrid MILP and benders decomposition approach to find the nucleolus quota allocation for a renewable energy portfolio’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 30, (6), pp. 32653275.
    24. 24)
      • 1. Shafiee, S., Zareipour, H., Knight, A.M., et al: ‘Risk-constrained bidding and offering strategy for a merchant compressed air energy storage plant’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (2), pp. 946957.
    25. 25)
      • 18. Fang, X., Li, F., Hu, Q., et al: ‘Strategic CBDR bidding considering FTR and wind power’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2016, 10, (10), pp. 24642474.
    26. 26)
      • 12. Thatte, A.A., Xie, L., Viassolo, D.E., et al: ‘Risk measure based robust bidding strategy for arbitrage using a wind farm and energy storage’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2013, 4, (4), pp. 21912199.
    27. 27)
      • 6. He, G., Chen, Q., Kang, C., et al: ‘Optimal bidding strategy of battery storage in power markets considering performance-based regulation and battery cycle life’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2016, 7, (5), pp. 23592367.
    28. 28)
      • 23. Chen, S., Ping, J., Le, X., et al: ‘Forming bidding curves for a distribution system operator’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2018, 33, (5), pp. 53895400.
    29. 29)
      • 16. Wang, Y., Dvorkin, Y., Fernandez-Blanco, R., et al: ‘Look-ahead bidding strategy for energy storage’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2017, 8, (3), pp. 11061117.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6219
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.6219
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address