Flexible-regulation resources planning for distribution networks with a high penetration of renewable energy

Flexible-regulation resources planning for distribution networks with a high penetration of renewable energy

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Your details
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Aimed at the status of distribution networks with a high penetration of renewable energy starved of flexible-regulation resources for improving their ability to absorb renewable-energy sources, this study puts forward flexibility-supply and flexibility-demand indexes for distribution networks and establishes a bi-level programming model for the distribution of flexible-regulation resources within the system-flexibility-balance constraints. The lower-level planning model seeks the lowest annual operating cost, lowest annual network loss, and lowest annual abandonment of wind and solar sources; in addition to the traditional power balances and constraints of various control variables and state variables, the requirement to balance constraints involving the flexibility of the system's supply and demand is even more crucial. The upper-level model aims to minimise the annual investment and operational costs. Combining the models, a double-layer iterative optimisation algorithm for flexible-regulation-resource allocation is proposed. Simulation results for an actual distribution network show that the proposed bi-level programming model can increase the capacity to absorb renewable energy and reduce system losses with the lowest investment and operational cost.


    1. 1)
      • 1. Zongxiang, L., Han, H., Baoguo, S., et al: ‘Morphological evolution model and power forecasting prospect of future electric power systems with high proportion of renewable energy’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2017, 41, (9), pp. 1218.
    2. 2)
      • 2. Chongqing, K., Liangzhong, Y.: ‘Key scientific issues and theoretical research framework for power systems with high proportion of renewable energy’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2017, 41, (9), pp. 211.
    3. 3)
      • 3. Zongxiang, L., Haibo, L., Ying, Q.: ‘Power system flexibility planning and challenges considering high proportion of renewable energy’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2016, 40, (13), pp. 147157.
    4. 4)
      • 4. Zeheng, L., Lei, C., Xiaomin, L., et al: ‘Assessment of renewable energy accommodation based on system flexibility analysis’, Power Syst. Technol., 2017, 41, (07), pp. 21872194.
    5. 5)
      • 5. Cecati, C., Citro, C., Siano, P.: ‘Combined operations of renewable energy systems and responsive demand in a smart grid’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2011, 2, (4), pp. 468476.
    6. 6)
      • 6. You, Y., Liu, D., Zhong, Q., et al: ‘Multi-time scale coordinated control of distributed generators based on active distribution network’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2014, 38, (09), pp. 192198o+203.
    7. 7)
      • 7. Meng, X., Gao, J., Sheng, W., et al: ‘A day-ahead two-stage optimal scheduling model for distribution network containing distributed generations’, Power Syst. Technol., 2015, 39, (05), pp. 12941300.
    8. 8)
      • 8. Pu, T., Liu, W., Chen, N., et al: ‘Distributed optimal dispatching of active distribution network based on consensus algorithm’, Proc. CSEE, 2017, 37, (06), pp. 15791590.
    9. 9)
      • 9. Lu, Z., Wei, T., Pengwei, C., et al: ‘Optimal configuration of generalized power sources in distribution network based on chance constrained programming and bi-level programming’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2014, 38, (5), pp. 5058.
    10. 10)
      • 10. Xiulei, L., Guangfei, G., Yuqi, J., et al: ‘Integrated optimal planning of energy storage and demand side response in active power distribution network’, Power Syst. Technol., 2016, 40, (12), pp. 38033810.
    11. 11)
      • 11. Ming, D., Bo, W., Bo, Z., et al: ‘Configuration optimization of capacity of standalone PV-wind-diesel-battery hybrid microgrid’, Power Syst. Technol., 2013, 37, (3), pp. 575581.
    12. 12)
      • 12. Dingyao, X., Chengmin, W., Pingliang, Z., et al: ‘Power source flexibility evaluation considering renewable energy generation uncertainty’, Electr. Power Autom. Equip., 2015, 35, (7), pp. 120125.
    13. 13)
      • 13. Peng, W., Hongzhong, L., Fenglei, L., et al: ‘Multi-time scale flexible indices of power system’, Electr. Power Constr., 2016, 37, (2), pp. 5762.
    14. 14)
      • 14. Lannoye, E., Flynn, D., O'Malley, M.: ‘Evaluation of power system flexibility’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (2), pp. 922931.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Zongxiang, L., Haibo, L., Ying, Q., et al: ‘Assessment on operational flexibility of power grid with grid-connected large-scale wind farms’, Power Syst. Technol., 2015, 39, (6), pp. 16721678.
    16. 16)
      • 16. Dingyao, X., Chengmin, W., Pingliang, Z., et al: ‘A survey on power system flexibility and its evaluations’, Power Syst. Technol., 2014, 38, (6), pp. 15691576.
    17. 17)
      • 17. Zongxiang, L., Haibo, L., Ying, Q.: ‘Flexibility evaluation and supply/demand balance principle of power system with high-penetration renewable electricity’, Proc. CSEE, 2017, 37, (1), pp. 919.
    18. 18)
      • 18. Juan, M., Silva, V., Belhomme, R., et al: ‘Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2013, 4, (1), pp. 200209.
    19. 19)
      • 19. Chandler: ‘Harnessing variable renewables: a guide to the balancing challenge’, 2011.
    20. 20)
      • 20. North American Electric Reliability Corporation: ‘Special report: accommodating high levels o1 variable generation’ (North American Electric Reliability Corporation, American, 2009).
    21. 21)
      • 21. Moeini-Aghtaie, M., Dehghanian, P., Fotuhi-Fiuzabad, M., et al: ‘Multi agent genetic algorithm: an online probabilistic view on economic dispatch of energy hubs constrained by wind availability’, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, 2014, 5, (2), pp. 699708.
    22. 22)
      • 22. Zhang, Z., Sun, Y., Li, G., et al: ‘A solution of the economic dispatch problem considering wind power uncertainty’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2011, 35, (22), pp. 125130.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Mahdavi, M.S., Vahidi, B., Babamalek, G., et al: ‘A novel optimized fuzzy approach based on Monte Carlo method for system load wind turbine and photovoltaic unit uncertainty modeling in unit commitment’, Electr. Power Compon. Syst., 2016, 44, (8), pp. 833842.
    24. 24)
      • 24. Miranda, V., Hang, P.S.: ‘Economic dispatch model with fuzzy wind constraints and attitudes of dispatchers’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, pp. 21432145.
    25. 25)
      • 25. Tao, H., Jie, G.: ‘Modeling of HVDC based on the user defined model of PSASP’. Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2007, 31, (6), pp. 2327.
    26. 26)
      • 26. Shuqiang, Z., Haiwei, W.: ‘Power distribution system reliability evaluation based on blind number’, Power Syst. Prot. Control, 2011, 39, (16), pp. 712.
    27. 27)
      • 27. Jiakun, Z., Gang, W., Lan, Z., et al: ‘Blind number model based power supply capability evaluation of distribution networks with distributed generators’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2016, 40, (8), pp. 6470.
    28. 28)
      • 28. Li, L., Hongyun, F., Ruchen, L., et al: ‘A regional wind power typical scenarios’ selection method based on hierarchical clustering algorithm’, Power Syst. Prot. Control, 2018, 46, (7), pp. 16.
    29. 29)
      • 29. Hongli, G., Juntao, L., Hong, G.: ‘A survey of bilevel programming model and algorithm’. 2011 Fourth Int. Symp. Computational Intelligence and Design, Hangzhou, China, October 2011, pp. 199203.
    30. 30)
      • 30. Jingxiang, Z., Huanna, N., Xiaoxue, Z.: ‘Island partition of distribution network with microgrid based on the energy at risk’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2017, 11, (4), pp. 830837.

Related content

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address