Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Influence of uncertainties and parameter structural dependencies in distribution system state estimation

This study evaluates a number of uncertain parameters that affect the accuracy of distribution system state estimation (SE), and ranks their importance using an efficient sensitivity analysis technique, Morris screening method. The influence of the uncertain parameters on SE performance is analysed globally and zonally. Furthermore, the dependence structure between the critical variable and SE accuracy is analysed using copula to establish their relationship at different section of the bivariate space. The sensitivity of the critical parameter at different ranges is also studied and ranked using Morris screening methods to present the variation of SE performance when the critical variable is allocated at different sections within the feasible range. Accurate assessment of the importance of various uncertain parameters and the analysis of the dependence structure can inform power system operators which parameters will require the greatest levels of mitigation or increased monitoring accuracy in order to have satisfactory performance of distribution system SE.

References

    1. 1)
      • 19. Alimardani, A., Therrien, F., Atanackovic, D., et al: ‘Distribution system state estimation based on nonsynchronized smart meters’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2015, 6, (6), pp. 29192928.
    2. 2)
      • 25. Hesmondhalgh, S.: ‘GB energy demand-2010 and 2025. Initial brattle electricity demand-side model-scope for demand reduction and flexible response’, 2012.
    3. 3)
      • 9. Iooss, B., Lemaıtre, P.: ‘A review on global sensitivity analysis methods’ (Springer, Boston, MA, USA, 2015).
    4. 4)
      • 24. HiPerDNO/2011/D.2.2.1: ‘Report on Use of Distribution State Estimation Results for Distribution Network Automation Functions’, 2011.
    5. 5)
      • 2. Yih-Fang, H., Werner, S., Jing, H., et al: ‘State estimation in electric power grids: meeting new challenges presented by the requirements of the future grid’, IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., 2012, 29, (5), pp. 3343.
    6. 6)
      • 10. Preece, R., Milanovic, J.V.: ‘Assessing the applicability of uncertainty importance measures for power system studies’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 31, (3), pp. 20762084.
    7. 7)
      • 11. Patton, A.J.: ‘Copula-based models for financial time series’, in Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiss, J.P., et al (Eds.) ‘Handbook of financial time series’ (Springer-Verlag, Berlin & Heidelberg, 2007), pp. 767785.
    8. 8)
      • 5. Minguez, R., Conejo, A. J.: ‘State estimation sensitivity analysis’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (3), pp. 10801091.
    9. 9)
      • 27. Muscas, C., Pilo, F., Pisano, G., et al: ‘Considering the uncertainty on the network parameters in the optimal planning of measurement systems for distribution state estimation’. Proc. Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf., Warsaw, Poland, 2007, pp. 16.
    10. 10)
      • 23. Singh, R., Pal, B.C., Vinter, R.B.: ‘Measurement placement in distribution system state estimation’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (2), pp. 668675.
    11. 11)
      • 14. Morris, M.D.: ‘Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments’, Technometrics, 1991, 33, (2), pp. 161174.
    12. 12)
      • 1. Abur, A., Exposito, A.G.: ‘Power system state estimation: theory and implementation’ (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004).
    13. 13)
      • 26. EN 50160:2004: ‘Voltage disturbances standard EN 50160 – voltage characteristics in public distribution systems’, 2004.
    14. 14)
      • 3. Nanchian, S., Majumdar, A., Pal, B.C.: ‘Three-phase state estimation using hybrid particle swarm optimization’, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 2015, 8, (3), pp. 10351045.
    15. 15)
      • 15. Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Saltelli, A.: ‘An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models’, Environ. Modell. Soft., 2007, 22, (10), pp. 15091518.
    16. 16)
      • 29. Jiang, F., Bo, Z.: ‘Modelling of on-load tap-changer transformer with variable impedance and its applications’. Proc. Energy Management and Power Delivery., Singapore, 1998, pp. 491494.
    17. 17)
      • 18. Roytelman, I., Shahidehpour, S.M.: ‘State estimation for electric power distribution systems in quasi real-time conditions’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1993, 8, (4), pp. 20092015.
    18. 18)
      • 8. Hasan, K., Preece, R., Milanovic, J.V.: ‘Priority ranking of critical uncertainties affecting small-disturbance stability using sensitivity analysis techniques’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2017, 32, (4), pp. 26292639. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2618347.
    19. 19)
      • 4. Ke, L.: ‘State estimation for power distribution system and measurement impacts’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1996, 11, (2), pp. 911916.
    20. 20)
      • 7. King, D.M., Perera, B.J.C.: ‘Morris method of sensitivity analysis applied to assess the importance of input variables on urban water supply yield – A case study’, J. Hydr., 2013, 477, pp. 1732.
    21. 21)
      • 6. Macii, D., Barchi, G., Petri, D.: ‘Uncertainty sensitivity analysis of WLS-based grid state estimators’. Proc. Int. Workshop on Applied Measure. for Power System, Aachen, Germany, September 2014, pp. 16.
    22. 22)
      • 17. Liao, H., Abdelrahman, S., Milanovic, J.: ‘Zonal mitigation of power quality using FACTS devices for provision of differentiated quality of electricity supply in networks with renewable generation’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2016, 32, (4), pp. 19751985.
    23. 23)
      • 12. Bina, M.T., Ahmadi, D.: ‘Stochastic modeling for the next day domestic demand response applications’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2015, 30, (6), pp. 28802893.
    24. 24)
      • 21. IEC 61000-4-30:2003: ‘Testing and measurement techniques – power quality measurement methods’, 2003.
    25. 25)
      • 22. Asprou, M., Kyriakides, E., Albu, M.: ‘Bad data detection considering the accuracy of instrument transformers’. Proc. IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, July 2016.
    26. 26)
      • 20. IEC 61869-2:2012: ‘Instrument transformers – Part 2: additional requirements for current transformers’, 2012.
    27. 27)
      • 28. IEC 60076-1:2000.: ‘Power transformers – Part 1: general’, 2000.
    28. 28)
      • 16. Patton, A.J.: ‘On the out-of-sample importance of skewness and asymmetric dependence for asset allocation’, J. Financial. Econometrics, 2004, 2, (1), pp. 130168.
    29. 29)
      • 13. Woolley, N.C., Milanović, J.V.: ‘Statistical estimation of the source and level of voltage unbalance in distribution networks’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2012, 27, pp. 14501460.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1906
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1906
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address