http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Distribution feeder-level day-ahead peak load forecasting methods and comparative study

Distribution feeder-level day-ahead peak load forecasting methods and comparative study

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy eFirst article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
— Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Day-ahead peak load forecasting is a crucial factor for the electrical utility for daily power planning and distribution. A comparative study of the peak load forecasting at distribution feeder-level circuits with high penetration level of PV generation are investigated. First, two years of private load data from the local utility and two years of public load data from Texas utility are analysed. The correlation analysis is applied to peak load and its driver factors. Next, Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) is employed to do peak load forecasting. Since the BART method takes an amount of time to generate the forecasting, the composite kernel methods based on Gaussian process regression (CKGPR) are designed. Then these methods are compared with multiple linear regression method and the support vector regression method based on the residential area and the business area load data. Thorough comparison results are presented based on five forecasting measurements. The BART has the best forecasting accuracy among all the indices, and the CKGPR also has counterpart forecasting results but with less computation time. Meanwhile, the forecasting accuracy difference between two areas is analysed. Lastly, influential driver factors are summarised.

http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1745
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1745
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address