Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Accelerated distribution systems reliability evaluation by multilevel Monte Carlo simulation: implementation of two discretisation schemes

This study presents the performances of two discretisation schemes which are implemented in a novel multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method for reliability calculation of power distribution systems. The motivation of using the proposed approach is to reduce the computational effort of standard Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and accelerate the overall distribution system reliability evaluation process. The MLMC methods are implemented through solving the stochastic differential equations (SDEs) of random variables related to the reliability indices. The SDE can be solved using different discretisation schemes. Two different discretisation schemes, namely Euler–Maruyama (EM) and Milstein are utilised in this study. For this reason, the proposed MLMC methods are named as EM-MLMC and Milstein MLMC. The reliability evaluation efficiency of the methods is analysed and compared based on accuracy and computational time saving for basic reliability assessment of Roy Billinton test system. Numerical results show that both methods reduce the computational time required to estimate the reliability indices compared with the same discretisation schemes used in MCS and maintain satisfactory accuracy levels.

References

    1. 1)
      • 7. González-Fernández, R.A., da Silva, A.M.L., Resende, L.C., et al: ‘Composite systems reliability evaluation based on Monte Carlo simulation and cross-entropy methods’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, pp. 45984606.
    2. 2)
      • 13. Huda, A.S.N., Živanović, R.: ‘Improving distribution system reliability calculation efficiency using multilevel Monte Carlo method’, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., 2017, 27, (7), pp. 112.
    3. 3)
      • 4. Billinton, R., Acharya, J.: ‘Weather-based distribution system reliability evaluation’, IEE Proc., Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2006, 153, pp. 499506.
    4. 4)
      • 10. da Silva, A.M.L., González-Fernández, R.A., Flávio, S.A., et al: ‘Composite reliability evaluation with renewable sources based on quasi-sequential Monte Carlo and cross entropy methods’. Proc. Int. Conf. Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), 2014, pp. 16.
    5. 5)
      • 24. Bierig, C., Chernov, A.: ‘Approximation of probability density functions by the multilevel Monte Carlo maximum entropy method’, J. Comput. Phys., 2016, 314, pp. 661681.
    6. 6)
      • 21. Platen, E.: ‘An introduction to numerical methods for stochastic differential equations’, Acta Numer., 1999, 8, pp. 197246.
    7. 7)
      • 20. Kloeden, P.E., Platen, E.: ‘Higher-order implicit strong numerical schemes for stochastic differential equations’, J. Stat. Phys., 1992, 66, pp. 283314.
    8. 8)
      • 19. Giles, M.B.: ‘Multilevel Monte Carlo for basket options’. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf., 2009, pp. 12831290.
    9. 9)
      • 14. Kalos, M.H., Whitlock, P.A.: ‘Monte Carlo methods’ (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
    10. 10)
      • 16. Retterath, B., Chowdhury, A.A., Venkata, S.S.: ‘Decoupled substation reliability assessment’, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 2005, 27, pp. 662668.
    11. 11)
      • 15. Giles, M.: ‘Improved multilevel Monte Carlo convergence using the Milstein scheme’, in Keller, A., Heinrich, S., Niederreiter, H. (EDs.): ‘Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods’, Springer, 2006), 2008, pp. 343358.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Giles, M.B.: ‘Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation’, Oper. Res., 2008, 56, pp. 607617.
    13. 13)
      • 12. Huda, A.S.N., Živanović, R.: ‘Distribution system reliability assessment using sequential multilevel Monte Carlo method’. Proc. IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT-Asia) Conf., Melbourne, 2016, pp. 867872.
    14. 14)
      • 1. Allan, R.: ‘Reliability evaluation of power systems’ (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
    15. 15)
      • 22. Billinton, R., Jonnavithula, S.: ‘A test system for teaching overall power system reliability assessment’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1996, 11, pp. 16701676.
    16. 16)
      • 17. Harrison, J.M.: ‘Brownian motion and stochastic flow systems’ (Wiley, New York, 1985).
    17. 17)
      • 25. González-Fernández, R.A., da Silva, A.M.L.: ‘Reliability assessment of time-dependent systems via sequential cross-entropy Monte Carlo simulation’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, pp. 23812389.
    18. 18)
      • 2. Alkuhayli, A.A., Raghavan, S., Chowdhury, B.H.: ‘Reliability evaluation of distribution systems containing renewable distributed generations’. Proc. North American Power Symp. (NAPS), 2012, pp. 16.
    19. 19)
      • 3. Goel, L., Billinton, R.: ‘Evaluation of interrupted energy assessment rates in distribution systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 1991, 6, pp. 18761882.
    20. 20)
      • 5. Billinton, R., Wang, P.: ‘Distribution system reliability cost/worth analysis using analytical and sequential simulation techniques’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1998, 13, pp. 12451250.
    21. 21)
      • 8. Wang, Y.: ‘Probabilistic spinning reserve adequacy evaluation for generating systems using a Markov chain Monte Carlo-integrated cross-entropy method’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2015, 9, pp. 719726.
    22. 22)
      • 9. Hou, K., Jia, H., Xu, X., et al: ‘A continuous time Markov chain based sequential analytical approach for composite power system reliability assessment’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2016, 31, pp. 738748.
    23. 23)
      • 23. Allan, R.N., Billinton, R., Sjarief, I.: ‘A reliability test system for educational purposes-basic distribution system data and results’, IEEE Trans. Power syst., 1991, 6, pp. 813820.
    24. 24)
      • 6. Martinez-Velasco, J.A., Guerra, G.: ‘Parallel Monte Carlo approach for distribution reliability assessment’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2014, 8, pp. 18101819.
    25. 25)
      • 18. Oksendal, B.: ‘Stochastic differential equations: an introduction with applications’ (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0231
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0231
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address