Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Signal processing for TFR of synchro-phasor data

With increased number of phasor measurement units (PMUs) deployment in the power system, there is growing interest in real-time event detection. The study in this paper presents post-processing approach to map the event occurrence for large sets of synchro-phasor data available from different regions/buses in the power network. The time–frequency representation (TFR) is applied to analyse the transients that contain rapid variations in amplitude or phase during the event occurrence against post-event conditions. This is based on reassigned smoothed-pseudo-Wigner–Ville distribution. The capability to correctly localise TF regions, where signals are locally coupled, is assessed on synthetic signal and PMUs signals. Important information such as time marginals is estimated to determine any event present in the analysed signal segment. Furthermore, the event localisation is enhanced applying Hough transform on TFR with calculation of group delay and reassignment vector. The developed procedure gives reasonable results for highlighting the distinct representation of events in study. The proposed approach can be easily implemented in real-time monitoring for event detection in the power system.

References

    1. 1)
      • 20. Vanfretti, L., Bengtsson, S., Gjerde, J.O.: ‘Preprocessing synchronized phasor measurement data for spectral analysis of electromechanical oscillations in the Nordic grid’, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., 2015, 25, pp. 348358.
    2. 2)
      • 16. Lauria, D., Pisani, C.: ‘On Hilbert transform methods for low frequency oscillations detection’, IET. Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2014, 8, (6), pp 10611074.
    3. 3)
      • 8. Sun, K., Likhate, S., Vittal, V., et al: ‘An online dynamic security assessment scheme using phasor measurements and decision trees’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (4), pp. 19351943.
    4. 4)
      • 5. Weiqing, J., Vittal, V., Heydt, G.T.: ‘A distributed state estimator utilizing synchronized phasor measurements’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (2), pp. 563571.
    5. 5)
      • 19. Djebbari, A., Bereksi-Reguig, F.: ‘Detection of the valvular split within the second heart sound using the reassigned smoothed pseudo Wigner–Ville distribution’, Biomed. Eng. Online, 2013, 12, pp. 3758.
    6. 6)
      • 23. Chi, P.J., Russell, C.T.: ‘Use of the Wigner–Ville distribution in interpreting and identifying ULF waves in triaxial magnetic records’, J. Geophys. Res., 2008, 113, p. A01218.
    7. 7)
      • 9. Chun-Lien, S., Bo-Yuan, J.: ‘Visualization of large-scale power system operations using phasor measurements’. Int. Conf. on Power System Technology, 2006, pp. 16.
    8. 8)
      • 27. http://www.tftb.nongnu.org/tutorial.pdf, Time–Frequency Toolbox, F. Auger, P. Flandrin, P. Goncalves, O. Lemoine.
    9. 9)
      • 12. Hauer, J.F., Bhatt, N., Shah, K., et al: ‘Performance of ‘WAMS East’ in providing dynamic information for the northeast blackout of August 14, 2003’. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, 2004, vol. 2, pp. 16851690.
    10. 10)
      • 25. Brookes, M., Naylor, P.A., Gudnason, J.: ‘A quantitative assessment of group delay methods for identifying glottal closures in voiced speech’, IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process., 2006, 14, (2), pp. 456466.
    11. 11)
      • 18. Djebbari, A., Bereksi-Reguig, F.: ‘Smoothed-pseudo Wigner–Ville distribution of normal and aortic stenosis heart sounds’, J. Mech. Med. Biol., 2005, 5, (3), p. 415.
    12. 12)
      • 11. Burnett, R.O.Jr., Butts, M.M., Cease, T.W., et al: ‘Synchronized phasor measurements of a power system event’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 1994, 9, (3), pp. 16431650.
    13. 13)
      • 10. Duong, D.T., Uhlen, K., Taranto, G.N., et al: ‘A comparative case study of online voltage instability monitoring’. IEEE 2015 PowerTech, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 29 June 2015–2 July 2015, pp. 16.
    14. 14)
      • 3. Kawahara, Y., Sugiyama, M.: ‘Change-point detection in time-series data by direct density-ratio estimation’. SIAM Int. Conf. on Data Mining, SIAM, 2009, pp. 389400.
    15. 15)
      • 7. Meliopoulos, A.P.S., Cokkinides, G., Wasynczuk, O., et al: ‘PMU data characterization and application to stability monitoring’. Power Syst. Conf. Exposition 2006. PSCE’06 2006 IEEE PES, Atlanta, GE, USA, Oct. 29–Nov. 1 2006, pp. 151158.
    16. 16)
      • 22. Auger, F., Flandrin, P.: ‘Improving the readability of time–frequency and time-scale representations by the reassignment method’, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1995, 43, (5), pp. 10681089.
    17. 17)
      • 15. Ukil, A., Zivanovic, R.: ‘Abrupt change detection in power system fault analysis using adaptive whitening filter and wavelet transform’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., Elsevier, 2006, 76, (9-10), pp. 815823.
    18. 18)
      • 24. Choi, H., Williams, W.: ‘Improved time–frequency representation of multicomponent signals using exponential Kernels’, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 1989, 37, (6), pp. 862871.
    19. 19)
      • 4. Lin, Z., Xia, T., Ye, Y., et al: ‘Application of wide area measurement systems to islanding detection of bulk power system’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, (2), pp. 20062015.
    20. 20)
      • 1. Jin, Y., Tebekaemi, E., Berges, M., et al: ‘A time–frequency approach for event detection in non-intrusive load monitoring’. Proc. of the Signal Processing, Sensor Fusion, and Target Recognition, XX, Orlando, FL, USA, 2011, p. 80501u.
    21. 21)
      • 2. Cecílio, I.M., Ottewill, J.R., Fretheim, H., et al: ‘Multivariate detection of transient disturbances for uni- and multirate systems’, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2015, 23, pp. 14771493.
    22. 22)
      • 17. Poularikas, A.D.: ‘The transforms and applications handbook’ (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000, 2nd edn.).
    23. 23)
      • 6. Zhou, M., Centeno, V.A., Thorp, J.S., et al: ‘An alternative for including phasor measurements in state estimators’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (4), pp. 19301937.
    24. 24)
      • 26. https://www.naspi.org/meetingarchives.
    25. 25)
      • 21. Orini, M., Bailón, R., Mainardi, L.T., et al: ‘Characterization of dynamic interactions between cardiovascular signals by time–frequency coherence’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2012, 59, pp. 663673.
    26. 26)
      • 13. Yang, P., Tan, Z., Wiesel, A., et al: ‘Power system state estimation using PMUs with imperfect synchronization’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2013, 28, pp. 41624172.
    27. 27)
      • 14. Bakshi, B.R., Stephanopoulos, G.: ‘Representation of process trends – III. multiscale extraction of trends from process data’, Comput. Chem. Eng., 1994, 18, (4), pp. 267302.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1566
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1566
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address