access icon free Optimal placement of underground cables to maximise total ampacity considering cable lifetime

This study presents a novel algorithm for the optimum placement for underground cable in a concrete duct bank to maximise ampacity and also the lifetime of the cable and fluctuation in the input variables. Fluctuations in the operating temperature cable result from variations in factors such as the ambient temperature, the thermal resistivity of the soil and back fill, as well as the loading of the cable. Operating the cable near or above its thermal rating could have an adverse effect on the aging of the cable insulation subsequently reducing the lifetime of the cable. The algorithm reported in this study considers the factors mentioned above and computes the optimum cable placement in the duct bank by calculating simulated lifetimes for the cables. It makes use of an Arrhenius thermal model to calculate the lifetime of the cable as well as the vector immune system algorithm and interior point method to optimise the placement of the cables in the duct bank. The proposed method has been used in a test case to show how cable placement affects the lifetime of the cables in the duct bank.

Inspec keywords: underground transmission systems; underground cables; power cable insulation; optimisation

Other keywords: cable lifetime maximisation; concrete duct bank; optimal underground cable placement optimisation; adverse effect; thermal rating; total ampacity maximisation; interior point method; operating temperature cable fluctuation; Arrhenius thermal model; cable insulation aging

Subjects: Power transmission, distribution and supply; Optimisation techniques; Power cables; Insulation and insulating coatings

References

    1. 1)
      • 14. Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: ‘Convex Optimization’ (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
    2. 2)
      • 16. IEC Standard 60853-1: ‘Calculation of the cyclic and emergency current rating of cables. Part 1: Cyclic rating factor for cables up to and including 18/30(36) kV’. Publication 853-862, 1989.
    3. 3)
      • 17. Goldenberg, H.: ‘Emergency loading of buried cable with tempearture-dependent conductor resistance’, Proc. IEE, 1971, 118, pp. 18071810.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 1. Anders, G.J.: ‘Rating of electric power cables – ampacity calculations for transmission, distribution and industrial applications’ (IEEE Press, 1997).
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
      • 19. Stojanovic, M., Tasic, D., Ristic, A.: ‘Cyclic current rating of single-core XLPE cables with respect to designed lifetime’, Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 2013, 89, pp. 152156.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
      • 8. Di Silvestre, M.L., Massaro, F., Mineo, L., Zizzo, G.: ‘A statistical approach of cables ageing in MV lines on thermal and electrical combined stresses’. Int. Symp. Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), May 2006, pp. 846851.
    11. 11)
      • 6. IEC Standard 60853-2: ‘Calculation of the Cyclic and Emergency Current Ratings of Cables. Part 2: Cyclic Rating Factor of Cables Greater than 18/30 (36) kV and Emergency Ratings for Cables of All Voltages’ Publication 853-862, 1989.
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 11. Ramteke, P.K., Ahirwar, A.K., Shrestha, N.B., et al: ‘Thermal aging prediction of polymeric insulation cables from arrhenius plot using short-term test values’. Second Int. Conf. on Reliability, Safety and Hazd, 2010, pp. 325328.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • 12. Zhao, H.C., Lyall, J.S., Nourbakhsh, G.: ‘Probabilistic cable rating based on cable thermal environment studying’. Proc. Power Conf. Int. Conf. on Power System Technology, 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 10711076.
    16. 16)
      • 18. Goldenberg, H.: ‘The calculation of cyclic rating factors for cables laid direct or in ducts’, Proc. IEE, 1957, 104, pp. 154166.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0949
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0949
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading