© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
This study aims to solve for the optimal location and capacity of distributed generation (DG), taking vulnerable node identification into consideration, in active distribution networks (ADN). Vulnerable nodes exist in the distribution network. Considering that the power fluctuations of those vulnerable nodes will have a significant impact on other nodes, the allocations of the DGs should avoid such nodes. Therefore vulnerable node identification and removal from the network can greatly limit the siting range of DGs. In this study, the vulnerable nodes are identified based on the small-world network theory, which is used as the preliminary location of the DG. Then, a genetic algorithm (GA) is proposed to finally address the optimal location and capacity for grid-connected DG. A GA with voltage boundary constraints is utilised to effectively prevent the bus voltage from reaching its boundary. This method improves the calculation efficiency greatly and is therefore suitable for flexible distribution network topology in ADN. According to the change of the distribution network topology, the corresponding optimal location and capacity limit for the DG can be quickly calculated. Some examples validate the algorithm and prove that it has fast convergence.
References
-
-
1)
-
5. Gandomkar, M., Vakilian, M.: ‘A combination of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for optimal DG allocation in distributed networks’. Canadian Conf. Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005, pp. 645–648.
-
2)
-
22. Gautam, D., Mithulananthan, N.: ‘Optimal DG placement in deregulated electricity market’, Electr. Power Syst. Res., 2007, 77, (12), pp. 1627–1636 (doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.11.014).
-
3)
-
16. Dingwei, W., Junwei, W., Hongfeng, W., Ruiyou, Z., Zhe, G.: ‘Intelligent optimization methods’ (Higher Education Press, China, 2007).
-
4)
-
19. Hangyu, K., Jing, J., Yong, S.: ‘Improving crossover and mutation for adaptive genetic algorithm’, Comput. Eng. Appl., 2006, 42, (12), pp. 93–99.
-
5)
-
N. Acharya ,
P. Mahat ,
N. Mithulananthan
.
An analytical approach for DG allocation in primary distribution network.
Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
,
10 ,
669 -
678
-
6)
-
1. Yiran, A.N., Xilin, W., Yu, L., Jian, L.: ‘Enlightenment and thinking learned from blackout in the Munich area of Germany’, East China Electr. Power, 2013, 41, (3), pp. 537–541.
-
7)
-
4. Celli, G., Pilo, F.: ‘Optimal distributed generation allocation in MV distribution networks’. Proc. 22nd IEEE Power Engineering Society Int. Conf. Power Industry Computer Applications, Sydney, 2001, pp. 81–86.
-
8)
-
12. Zhongwei, M., Zongxiang, L., Jingyan, S.: ‘Comparative analysis of the small-world network topology between US and China’, Autom. Electr. Power Syst., 2004, 28, (15), pp. 21–29.
-
9)
-
22. Power system test case archive. .
-
10)
-
23. Yang, J., Zhou, J., Liu, L., Li, Y.: ‘A novel strategy of pareto-optimal solution searching in multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO)[J]’, Comput. Math. Appl., 2009, 57, (11), pp. 1995–2000 (doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.009).
-
11)
-
14. Watts, D.J.: ‘Small worlds – the dynamics of networks between order and randomness’ (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1998).
-
12)
-
18. Hajela, P., Lin, C.-Y.: ‘Genetic search strategies in multicriterion optimal design’, Struct. Optim., 1992, 4, (2), pp. 99–107 (doi: 10.1007/BF01759923).
-
13)
-
21. Zhihua, G., Jisong, K., Qiang, L.M.: ‘An evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm based on fuzzy preferences’, J. Tianjin Univ., 2002, 35, (3), pp. 275–280.
-
14)
-
6. El-Zonkoly, A.M.: ‘Optimal placement of multi-distributed generation units including different load models using particle swarm optimization’, Swarm and Evol. Comput., 2011, 1, (1), pp. 50–59 (doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2011.02.003).
-
15)
-
9. Zhanghua, Z., Qian, A., Chenghong, G., Chuanwen, J.: ‘Multi-objective allocation of distributed generation considering environmental factor’, Proceedings of the CSEE 2009, 29, (13), pp. 23–28.
-
16)
-
20. Chen, S.-M., Lee, L.-W.: ‘Fuzzy decision-making based on likelihood-based comparison relations’, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 2010, 18, (3), pp. 613–628 (doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2045385).
-
17)
-
D.J. Watts ,
S.H. Strogatz
.
Collective dynamics of “small world” networks.
Nature
,
440 -
442
-
18)
-
5. Abu-Mouti, F.S., El-Hawary, M. E.: ‘Optimal distributed generation allocation and sizing in distribution systems via artificial bee colony algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 2011, 26, (4), pp. 2090–2101 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRD.2011.2158246).
-
19)
-
15. Goldberg, D.E.: ‘Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning’ (Assison Wesley, MA, 1989).
-
20)
-
17. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: ‘A fast elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II’. Proc. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature Vl Conf., Paris, 2000, pp. 849–858.
-
21)
-
7. Sedighi, M., Igderi, A., Parastar, A.: ‘Sitting and sizing of DG in distribution network to improve of several parameters by PSO algorithm’. IPEC, 2010, pp. 533–538.
-
22)
-
11. Bin, L., Tianqi, L., Xingyuan, L.: ‘Impact of distributed generation on power system voltage stability’, Power Syst. Technol., 2009, 33, (3), pp. 84–88.
-
23)
-
2. Ahmadigorji, M., Abbaspour, A., Rajabi-ghahnavieh, A., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.: ‘Optimal DG placement in distribution systems using cost/worth analysis’, World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2009, 49, pp. 746–753.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0887
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0887
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6