access icon free Topology assessment for 3 + 3 terminal offshore DC grid considering DC fault management

This study assesses four DC grid topologies where each of the terminals can exchange power with any other terminal and a DC fault on any DC cable can be isolated. The DC grids are built using the following components: hybrid DC circuit breakers (CB), mechanical DC CBs, DC/DC converters and DC hubs. The aim is to compare DC fault performance, technical feasibility/readiness, power transfer security, expansion and costs. The base case for comparison are three separate 300 km offshore HVDCs connecting 3 1 GW offshore wind farms with three onshore VSC terminals. The rating of DC CBs is limited by the state of technology and costs which introduces limitation on the length of DC cables (because of communication delays) and on the DC bus fault level (limiting the number of connecting DC lines). DC/DC converters inherently block propagation of DC faults and their rating is not sensitive to DC fault level. DC hubs have considerable cost advantages over multiple DC/DC converters in cases where multiple DC systems are connecting at the same DC station. The cost assumptions for all major components are analysed, including the offshore platform costs. The study concludes that overall DC grid costs are similar (within 8%) for all four topologies. Although power security is similar for all technologies, the expansion options are best with DC/DC converters or DC hubs. DC hubs nevertheless suffer from highest on-state losses.

Inspec keywords: offshore installations; circuit breakers; DC-DC power convertors

Other keywords: power security; hybrid DC circuit breakers; topology assessment; offshore wind farms; terminal offshore DC grid; DC fault management; DC hubs; DC DC converters; HVDC; mechanical DC CB

Subjects: DC-DC power convertors; Switchgear; Wind power plants

References

    1. 1)
      • 5. Descloux, J., Raison, B., Curis, J.-B.: ‘Protection strategy for undersea MTDC grids’ (Powertech 2013, Grenoble, June 2013).
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
      • 4. Whitehouse, R.S.: ‘Technical challenges of realising multi-terminal networking with VSC’. Proc. of the 14th European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE 2011), Birmingham, September 2011.
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
      • 6. Häfner, J., Jacobson, B.: ‘Proactive hybrid HVDC breakers – a key innovation for reliable HVDC grids’. CIGRE 2011 Bologna Symp., Bologna, Italy, paper 264, September 2011.
    6. 6)
      • 3. Bell, K., Cirio, D., Denis, A.M., et al: ‘Economic and technical criteria for designing future off-shore HVDC grids’. Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conf. Europe (ISGT Europe), 2010 IEEE PES.
    7. 7)
      • 12. Kundur, P.: ‘Power system stability and control’ (McGraw Hill Inc, 1994).
    8. 8)
      • 2. Taherbaneh, M., Jovcic, D., Taisne, J.P., Nguefeu, S.: ‘DC fault performance and cost analysis of DC grids for connecting multiple offshore wind farms’ (Powertech, Grenoble, June 2013).
    9. 9)
      • 11. CIGRE working group B4.52 ‘Feasibility of DC grids’ CIGRE Brochure 533, 2013.
    10. 10)
      • 1. Descloux, J., Rault, P., Nguefeu, S., et al: ‘HVDC meshed grid: Control and protection of a multi-terminal HVDC system’. CIGRE B4-308, France, general assembly2012.
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • 14. Junyent-Ferre, A., Prieto-Araujo, E., Gomis-Bellmunt, O., Bianchi, F.: ‘Voltage sag ridethrough of PMSG wind turbines using droop control stabilization’. European Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE 2011), August 30 2011–September 1 2011, pp. 1, 8.
    14. 14)
      • 10. ENTSOE: ‘Offshore transmission technology’. Report by regional group north sea for the NSCOGI, November 2011, https://www.entsoe.eu/publications/system-development-reports/north-seas-grid-development/.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0838
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2013.0838
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading