Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

access icon free Stochastic self-scheduling of generation companies in day-ahead multi-auction electricity markets considering uncertainty of units and electricity market prices

This study presents a new stochastic self-scheduling model for generation companies (GENCOs) in day-ahead electricity markets including energy and reserves auctions. The proposed stochastic model takes into account both the uncertainty of predicted market prices and forced outages of generating units. Also, financial risk of GENCOs is formulated through well-known conditional value-at-risk index. The proposed self-scheduling model is tested on the IEEE 118-bus test system and the obtained results are discussed.

References

    1. 1)
      • 8. Li, T., Shahidehpour, M., Li, Z.: ‘Risk-constrained bidding strategy with stochastic unit commitment’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2007, 22, (1), pp. 449458 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.887894).
    2. 2)
      • 14. Simoglou, C.K., Biskas, P.N., Bakirtzis, A.G.: ‘Optimal self-scheduling of a thermal producer in short-term electricity markets by MILP’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2010, 25, (4), pp. 19651977 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2050011).
    3. 3)
      • 25. Carrion, M., Arroyo, J.M.: ‘A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2006, 21, (3), pp. 13711378 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876672).
    4. 4)
      • 21. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: ‘Optimization of conditional value-at-risk’, J. Risk, 2000, 2, (3), pp. 2141.
    5. 5)
      • 20. Amjady, N., Vahidinasab, V.: ‘Security-constrained self-scheduling of generation companies in day-ahead electricity markets considering financial risk’, Energy Convers. Manage., 2013, 65, pp. 164172 (doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.07.008).
    6. 6)
      • 12. Morales, J.M., Pineda, S., Conejo, A.J., Carrion, M.: ‘Scenario reduction for futures market trading in electricity markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (2), pp. 878888 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016072).
    7. 7)
      • 1. Arroyo, J.M., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2000, 15, (3), pp. 10981104 (doi: 10.1109/59.871739).
    8. 8)
      • 2. Arroyo, J.M., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Optimal response of a power generator to energy, AGC, and reserve pool-based markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2002, 17, (2), pp. 404410 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.1007910).
    9. 9)
      • 19. Jabr, R.A.: ‘Self-scheduling under ellipsoidal price uncertainty: conic-optimisation approach’, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2007, 1, (1), pp. 2329 (doi: 10.1049/iet-gtd:20050039).
    10. 10)
      • 11. Ruiz, C., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Pool strategy of a producer with endogenous formation of locational marginal prices’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (4), pp. 1521 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2030378).
    11. 11)
      • 24. Ostrowski, J., Anjos, M.F., Vannelli, A.: ‘Tight mixed integer linear programming formulations for the unit commitment problem’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (1), pp. 3946 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2162008).
    12. 12)
      • 13. Garces, L.P., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Weekly self-scheduling, forward contracting, and offering strategy for a producer’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2010, 25, (2), pp. 657666 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2032658).
    13. 13)
      • 26. Amjady, N., Rashidi, A.A., Zareipour, H.: ‘Stochastic security-constrained joint market clearing for energy and reserves auctions considering uncertainties of wind power producers and unreliable equipment’, Eur. Trans. Electr. Power, 2012, doi: 10.1002/etep.670.
    14. 14)
      • 22. New York Independent System Operator, NYISO, available at http://www.nyiso.com, accessed December 2012.
    15. 15)
      • 7. Plazas, M.A., Conejo, A.J., Prieto, F.J.: ‘Multimarket optimal bidding for a power producer’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (4), pp. 20412050 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.856987).
    16. 16)
      • 35. The ILOG CPLEX, 2012, available at http://www.ilog.com/products/cplex, accessed December 2012.
    17. 17)
      • 6. Baillo, A., Ventosa, M., Rivier, M., Ramos, A.: ‘Optimal offering strategies for generation companies operating in electricity spot markets’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (2), pp. 745753 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.821429).
    18. 18)
      • 29. Gröwe-Kuska, N., Heitsch, H., Römisch, W.: ‘Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems’. Proc. IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conf., Bologna, Italy, June 2003.
    19. 19)
      • 30. SCENRED2 Solver Documentation, available at http://www.gams.com/dd/docs/solvers/scenred2.pdf, accessedDecember 2012.
    20. 20)
      • 18. Jabr, R.A.: ‘Robust self-scheduling under price uncertainty using conditional value-at risk’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, (4), pp. 18521858 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.856952).
    21. 21)
      • 9. Pineda, S., Conejo, A.J., Carrion, M.: ‘Impact of unit failure on forward contracting’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2008, 23, (4), pp. 17681775 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2004727).
    22. 22)
      • 31. IEEE 118-bus test system, available at http://motor.ece.iit.edu/data/PBUCData.pdf, accessed December 2012.
    23. 23)
      • 16. Kazempour, S.J., Conejo, A.J., Ruiz, C.: ‘Strategic generation investment using a complementarity approach’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (2), pp. 940948 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2069573).
    24. 24)
      • 34. Leite Da Silva, A.M., Da Fonseca Manso, L.A., De Oliveira Mello, J.C., Billinton, R.: ‘Pseudo-chronological simulation for composite reliability analysis with time varying loads’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2000, 15, (1), pp. 7380 (doi: 10.1109/59.852103).
    25. 25)
      • 33. Amjady, N., Keynia, F.: ‘Day-ahead price forecasting of electricity markets by mutual information technique and cascaded neuro-evolutionary algorithm’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2009, 24, (1), pp. 306318 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2006997).
    26. 26)
      • 17. Simoglou, C.K., Biskas, P.N., Bakirtzis, A.G.: ‘Optimal self-scheduling of thermal units during commissioning’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (1), pp. 181188 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2159521).
    27. 27)
      • 5. Ni, E., Luh, P.B., Rourke, S.: ‘Optimal integrated generation bidding and scheduling with risk management under a deregulated power market’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (1), pp. 600609 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818695).
    28. 28)
      • 23. The Electric Reliability Council of Texas, ERCOT, available at http://www.ercot.com, accessed December 2012.
    29. 29)
      • 27. Nejati, M., Amjady, N., Zareipour, H.: ‘A new stochastic search technique combined with scenario approach for dynamic state estimation of power systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2012, 27, (4), pp. 20932105 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2195038).
    30. 30)
      • 15. Baringo, L., Conejo, A.J.: ‘Offering strategy via robust optimization’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2011, 26, (3), pp. 14181425 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2092793).
    31. 31)
      • 28. Rosenthal, R.E.: ‘GAMS: A User's Guide’ (GAMS Development Corporation, Washington, DC, USA, 2012).
    32. 32)
      • 10. Conejo, A.J., Bertrand, R.G., Carrion, M., Caballero, A., de Andrés, A.: ‘Optimal involvement in futures markets of a power producer’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2008, 23, (2), pp. 703711 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.919245).
    33. 33)
      • 32. IEEE 118-bus test system, available at http://motor.ece.iit.edu/data/118bus_abreu.xls, accessed December 2012.
    34. 34)
      • 3. Conejo, A.J., Nogales, F.J., Arroyo, J.M.: ‘Price-taker bidding strategy under price uncertainty’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2002, 17, (4), pp. 10811088 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2002.804948).
    35. 35)
      • 4. Conejo, A.J., Nogales, F.J., Arroyo, J.M., Bertrand, R.G.: ‘Risk-constrained self-scheduling of a thermal power producer’, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2004, 19, (3), pp. 15691574 (doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2004.831652).
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0729
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2012.0729
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address