© The Institution of Engineering and Technology
In this study, the innovation approach is used to estimate the measurement total error associated with power system state estimation. This is required because the power system equations are very much correlated with each other and as a consequence part of the measurements errors is masked. For that purpose an index, innovation index (II), which provides the quantity of new information a measurement contains is proposed. A critical measurement is the limit case of a measurement with low II, it has a zero II index and its error is totally masked. In other words, that measurement does not bring any innovation for the gross error test. Using the II of a measurement, the masked gross error by the state estimation is recovered; then the total gross error of that measurement is composed. Instead of the classical normalised measurement residual amplitude, the corresponding normalised composed measurement residual amplitude is used in the gross error detection and identification test, but with m degrees of freedom. The gross error processing turns out to be very simple to implement, requiring only few adaptations to the existing state estimation software. The IEEE-14 bus system is used to validate the proposed gross error detection and identification test.
References
-
-
1)
-
N.G. Bretas
.
Network observability: theory and algorithms based on triangular factorisation and path graph concepts.
IEE Proc.-Gener., Transm. Distrib.
,
1 ,
123 -
128
-
2)
-
F.C. Schweppe
.
Power system static state estimation. Part III: implementation.
IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst.
,
1 ,
130 -
135
-
3)
-
Bretas, N.G., London, J.B.A., Alberto, L.F.C., Benedito, R.A.S.: `Geometrical approaches on masked gross errors for power systems state estimation', Proc. IEEE PES General Meeting, July 2009, Calgary.
-
4)
-
E. Handschin ,
F.C. Schweppe ,
J. Kohlas ,
A. Fiechter
.
Bad data analysis for power system state estimation.
IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst.
,
2 ,
329 -
337
-
5)
-
F.C. Schweppe ,
D. Rom
.
Power system static state estimation. Part II: approximate model.
IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst.
,
1 ,
125 -
130
-
6)
-
K.A. Clements ,
P.W. Davis
.
Multiple bad data detectability and identifiability: a geometric approach.
IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.
,
3 ,
355 -
360
-
7)
-
F.C. Schweppe ,
J. Wildes
.
Power system static state estimation. Part I: exact model.
IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst.
,
1 ,
120 -
125
-
8)
-
A. Monticelli
.
Electric power system state estimation.
Proc. IEEE
,
2 ,
262 -
282
-
9)
-
T. Kailath ,
A.H. Sayed ,
B. Hassibi
.
(2000)
Linear estimation.
-
10)
-
D.M. Falcão ,
M.A. Arias
.
State estimation and observability analysis based on echelon forms of the linearized measurement models.
IEEE Trans. Power Syst.
,
2 ,
979 -
987
-
11)
-
http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/, accessed January 2010.
-
12)
-
A. Abur ,
A.G. Exposito
.
(2004)
Power system state estimation: theory and implementation.
-
13)
-
B.D.O. Anderson ,
J.R. Moore
.
(1979)
Optimal filtering.
-
14)
-
Bretas, N.G., London, J.B.A., Alberto, L.F.C., Benedito, R.A.S.: `Geometrical approaches for gross errors analysis in power system state estimation', Proc. 2009 IEEE Bucharest Power Tech, June 2009, Romania.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0459
Related content
content/journals/10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0459
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6