Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Adaptive pattern spectrum image description using Euclidean and Geodesic distance without training for texture classification

Adaptive pattern spectrum image description using Euclidean and Geodesic distance without training for texture classification

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Mathematical morphology can be used to extract a shape–size distribution called pattern spectrum (PS) with texture description purposes. However, the structuring element (SE) used to compute it does not vary along the image; and therefore it does not capture its geometrical variations. The author's proposal consists of computing an SE at each pixel whose size and shape varies with two distance criterions: an Geodesic distance and a Euclidean distance, in order to fit the texture as well as possible. Combining the Geodesic and the Euclidean descriptors as just one descriptor, the classification results of several textures from the VisTex and Brodatz database show that this approach outperforms the classical PS, the Geodesic and the Euclidean descriptors separately and, in contrast with other adaptive methods, it does not require previous training.

References

    1. 1)
      • A. Asano , M. Miyagawa , M. Fujio , S.B. Heidelberg . (2003) Morphological texture analysis using optimization of structuring elements.
    2. 2)
      • He, M., Nian, Y., Wang, X., Li, Y., Xiao, S.: `Polarimetric extraction technique of atmospheric targets based on double sLdr and morphology', IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2011, 2011, p. 3245–3248.
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • Priya, S., Kumar, T.A., Paul, V.: `A novel approach to fabric defect detection using digital image processing', Int. Conf. on Signal Processing, Communication, Computing and Networking Technologies (ICSCCN), 2011, 2011, p. 228–232.
    5. 5)
      • G. Peyré , L.D. Cohen , J.M.R.S. Tavares , R.M.N. Jorge . (2009) Geodesic methods for shape and surface processing.
    6. 6)
      • Vision, M. Texture, M.G.V.: Available at ttp://vismod.media.mit.edu/vismod/imagery/visiontexture/2010.
    7. 7)
      • Cárdenes, R., Warfield, S.K., Macías, E., Ruiz-Alzola, J.: `Occlusion points propagation Geodesic distance transformation', Proc. Int. Conf. Image Processing ICIP 2003, 2003, 1.
    8. 8)
      • Kikuchi, T.: `Characteristic extraction from an ambiguous image using fuzzy mathematical morphology with adaptive structuring elements', Tenth IEEE Int. Conf. in Fuzzy Systems, 2001, 1, p. 228–231.
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
      • Wang, Tao, Wei, Na: `Multi-scale mathematical morphology based image edge detection', Second Int. Conf. on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application (ISDEA), 2012, 2012, p. 1060–1062.
    12. 12)
      • M. Petrou , P.G. Sevilla . (2006) Image processing: dealing with texture.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • J. Serra . (1982) Image analysis and math. morphology.
    16. 16)
      • P. Brodatz . (1966) Textures: a photographic album for artists and designers.
    17. 17)
      • G. Matheron . (1975) Random sets and integral geometry.
    18. 18)
      • J. Jost . (2008) Riemannian geometry and geometric analysis.
    19. 19)
      • Ben Salem, Y., Nasri, S.: `Rotation invariant texture classification using support vector machines', 2011 Int. Conf. Communications, Computing and Control Applications (CCCA), 2011, p. 1–6.
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
      • R.C. Gonzales , R.E. Woods . (1993) Digital image processing.
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2012.0098
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2012.0098
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address