Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Brain magnetic resonance image segmentation based on an adapted non-local fuzzy c-means method

Brain magnetic resonance image segmentation based on an adapted non-local fuzzy c-means method

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Intensity inhomogeneities cause considerable difficulties in the quantitative analysis of magnetic resonanceimages (MRIs). Consequently, intensity inhomogeneities estimation is a necessary step before quantitative analysis of MR data can be undertaken. This study proposes a new energy minimisation framework for simultaneous estimation of the intensity inhomogeneities and segmentation. The method was formulated by modifying the objective function of the standard fuzzy c-means algorithm to compensate for intensity inhomogeneities by using basis functions and to compensate for noise by using improved non-local information. The energy function depends on the coefficients of the basis functions, the membership ratios, the centroid of the tissues and an improved non-local information in the image. Intensity inhomogeneities estimation and image segmentation are simultaneously achieved by calculating the result of minimising this energy. The non-local framework has been widely used to provide non-local information; however, the traditional framework only considers the neighbouring patch information, which will lose information of the corner and end points. This study presents an improved non-local framework, which can contain the corner and end points region information. Experimental results on both real MRIs and simulated MR data show that the authors method can obtain more accurate results when segmenting images with bias field and noise.

References

    1. 1)
      • Li, C., Li, F., Kao, C., Xu, C.: `Image segmentation with simultaneous illumination and reflectance estimation: an energy minimization approach', Proc. Int. Conf. Computer Vision, 2009, 2, p. 702–708.
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
      • http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/cgi/bw/submit-request.
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
      • Ahmed, M.N., Yamany, S.M., Farag, A.A., Moriarty, T.: `Bias field estimation and adaptive segmentation of MRI data using amodified fuzzy c-means algorithm', IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1999, p. 250–255.
    16. 16)
      • Li, C., Xu, C., Anderson, A.W., Gore, J.C.: `MRI tissue classification and bias field estimation based on coherent local intensity clustering: a unified energy minimization framework', Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 2009, p. 510–519.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
      • Gilles, S., Brady, M., Declerck, J., Thirion, J.P., Ayache, N.: `Bias field correction of breast MR images', Fourth Int. Conf. Visualization in Biomedical Computing, 1996, p. 153–158.
    20. 20)
      • K. Leemput , F. Maes , D. Vandermeulen . Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans. Imag. Process. , 10 , 885 - 896
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
    32. 32)
    33. 33)
    34. 34)
    35. 35)
      • K. Ito . (1993) Encyclopedic dictionary of mathematics.
    36. 36)
    37. 37)
    38. 38)
    39. 39)
    40. 40)
    41. 41)
    42. 42)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2011.0263
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2011.0263
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address