Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Fusion of visual cues of intensity and texture in Markov random fields image segmentation

Fusion of visual cues of intensity and texture in Markov random fields image segmentation

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes an algorithm that fuses visual cues of intensity and texture in Markov random fields region growing texture image segmentation. The idea is to segment the image in a way that takes EdgeFlow edges into consideration, which provides a single framework for identifying objects boundaries based on texture and intensity descriptors. This is achieved by modifying the energy minimisation process, so that it would penalise merging regions that have EdgeFlow edges in the boundary between them. Experimental results confirm the hypothesis that the integration of edge information increases the precision of the segmentation by ensuring the conservation of the homogeneous objects contours during the region growing process.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
    3. 3)
    4. 4)
    5. 5)
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
    8. 8)
    9. 9)
    10. 10)
    11. 11)
    12. 12)
    13. 13)
      • A.K. Jain . (1988) Algorithms for clustering data.
    14. 14)
    15. 15)
    16. 16)
      • S.Z. Li . (2001) Markov random field modeling in image analysis.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
    21. 21)
    22. 22)
    23. 23)
    24. 24)
    25. 25)
    26. 26)
    27. 27)
    28. 28)
    29. 29)
    30. 30)
    31. 31)
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2011.0233
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2011.0233
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address