Wand-based calibration of 3D kinematic system

Access Full Text

Wand-based calibration of 3D kinematic system

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IET Computer Vision — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

This study proposes a method to calibrate 3D kinematic systems. The authors briefly address typical wand-based calibration, that is, calibration using a rigid bar, both from the computational point of view and the procedural perspective, and then they define their alternative way of calibration. The proposed method takes advantage of a feature of the presently used calibration tools, that is, the orthogonality of calibration wands. The usual two steps in wand calibration are reduced to a single one. In addition, the authors propose an alternative for how to enforce a typically available geometric constraint, that is, the known wand length, during the parameter optimisation procedure (the well-known bundle adjustment). The obtained 3D reconstruction accuracy has proven to be comparable with results of commercial 3D kinematic systems. The relative simplicity of the proposed method offers potential for an implementation by a large number of researchers.

Inspec keywords: cameras; calibration; optimisation; geometry

Other keywords: rigid bar; parameter optimisation procedure; 3D reconstruction; bundle adjustment; 3D kinematic systems; wand based calibration; calibration tool; geometric constraint; calibration wands

Subjects: Combinatorial mathematics; Image sensors; Photography, photographic instruments and techniques; Geometry, differential geometry, and topology; Measurement standards and calibration; Measurement standards and calibration; Optimisation techniques

References

    1. 1)
      • H.-G. Maas . Image sequence based automatic multi-camera system calibration techniques. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. , 763 - 768
    2. 2)
      • T. Pribanić , P. Sturm , M. Cifrek . Calibration of 3D kinematic systems using orthogonality constraints. Mach. Vis. Appl. , 6 , 367 - 381
    3. 3)
      • P. Allard , I. Stokes , J.-P. Blanchi . (1995) Three dimensional analysis of human movement.
    4. 4)
      • H.G. Maas . Image sequence based automatic multi-camera system calibration techniques. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. , 763 - 768
    5. 5)
      • McGlone, C.: `Bundle adjustment with object space geometric constraints for site modeling', Proc. SPIE Conf. Integrating Photogrammetric Techniques with Scene Analysis and Machine Vision II, 1995, Orlando, FL, USA, p. 25–36.
    6. 6)
      • C. McGlone , E. Mikhail , J. Bethel . (2004) Manual of photogrammetry.
    7. 7)
      • G.Q. Wei , S.D. Ma . Implicit and explicit camera calibration: theory and experiment. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. , 5 , 469 - 480
    8. 8)
      • H. Hatze . High-precision three-dimensional photogrammetric calibration and object space reconstruction using a modified DLT approach. J. Biomech. , 533 - 538
    9. 9)
      • W. Triggs , P.F. McLauchlan , R.I. Hartley , A. Fitzgibbon , B. Triggs , A. Zisserman , R. Szeliski . (2000) Bundle adjustment – a modern synthesis, Vision algorithms: theory and practice.
    10. 10)
      • C. Chatterjee , V.P. Roychowdhury , J.G. Webster . (1999) Camera calibration for image processing, Wiley encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering.
    11. 11)
      • Woltring, H.J., McClay, I.S., Cavanagh, P.R.: `3-D photogrammetric camera calibration without a calibration object', Proc. XII Int. Society of Biomechanics Meeting, 1989, Los Angeles.
    12. 12)
      • N.A. Borghese , P. Cerveri . Calibrating a video camera pair with a rigid bar. Pattern Recognit. , 1 , 81 - 95
    13. 13)
      • J.G. Semple , G.T. Kneebone . (1979) Algebraic projective geometry.
    14. 14)
      • O. Faugeras . (1993) Three-dimensional computer vision.
    15. 15)
      • K.B. Atkinson . (1996) Close range photogrammetry and machine vision.
    16. 16)
      • R. Hartley . (2003) Multiple view geometry in computer vision.
    17. 17)
      • W.H. Press , S.A. Teukolsky , W.T. Vetterling , B.P. Flannery . (1996) Numerical recipes in C.
    18. 18)
      • Pribanić, T.: `A method for modeling and analysis of human movement using optoelectronic system', 2005, Doctoral, University of Zagreb, Croatia, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing.
    19. 19)
      • MotionAnalysis: Available at http://www.motionanalysis.com, accessed October 2008.
    20. 20)
      • BTS Smart-e: Available at http://www.bts.it/eng/proser/elisma.htm, accessed October 2008.
    21. 21)
      • Vicon: Available at http://www.vicon.com/standard/, accessed October 2008.
    22. 22)
      • L. Chen , C.W. Armstrong , D.D. Raftopoulos . An investigation on the accuracy of three-dimensional space reconstruction using the direct linear transformation technique. J. Biomech. , 4 , 493 - 500
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2009.0004
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/iet-cvi.2009.0004
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading